NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
Guest avatarLoginRegisterLost password


New reply
Home
 
  • 21 Votes - 3.57 Average
NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
Author Message
02-27-2011 06:49 PM#1
ShadowMrs. Buckwheat
Posts: 13,527Joined: Feb 2011
NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, is holding an extraordinary session on Friday to discuss the situation in Libya, amid reports of a possible military intervention in the Arab country.

The Secretary General of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, made the announcement yesterday in Budapest, where he was meeting with the ministers of defense of the European Union.

Normally, the NATO Council would call a meeting among the permanent representatives of the 21-member military defense organization.

The High Representative of the European Union, Catherine Ashton, said that NATO would consider the imposition of a "no-fly zone" over Tripoli and increased sanctions against the Libyan government.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c...&aid=23404

wtf2.gif
02-27-2011 07:31 PM#2
JayRodneyⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts: 30,643Joined: Feb 2011
RE: NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
This reeks of an underlying plan to completely occupy the Middle East in order to secure all sources of oil... and ... at the same time drive prices up. I've read predictions of 200 usd per barrel coming soon.

The more I look at this unfolding scenario, the more I fear we're looking at another round of staged toppling of governments in order to have the observable effect we are now witnessing.

wonder.gif
02-27-2011 10:44 PM#3
UpāsakaMember
Posts: 1,448Joined: Feb 2011
RE: NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
soapbox.gif

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization - is exactly that. Its creation (formed on April 4, 1949) was only concerned with the threat of those 'Red Commie Bastards'.

As the Berlin wall fell and the Soviet Union disintegrated, Gorbachev was given assurances by the West that NATO would be disbanded, because there would be no need or for that matter international remit for such as organization, as the 'Red Threat' would no longer exist in the long run.

As ever this was quietly forgotten and we still have NATO, and far from dismantling it has expanded to 28 nations.

It is the strong arm of the Industrial Military Complex/corporatist's. NATO involvement in Iraq,Afghanistan and now the threat of involvement in Libya is purely for the protection of Oil and Gas resources.

NATO could care less about the people. Only need to look at its history in action with the indiscriminate aerial bombing of the former Yugoslavia.

Libya is not a member of NATO, it is a part of Africa, and by rights the African Union should get involved. Stop mercenaries that Qaddafi is flying in would be a start.

NATO/EU/UN, isn't interested in helping resolve African conflicts as long as the mineral wealth keeps flowing. See Darfur among many other conflicts, which due to western backed dictators, crushed any hint of descent.

Got there toes burnt in Somalia and never came back.
[/quote]
But low and behold if Big Oil investments are in trouble send in NATO pint.gif

Quote:On 19 June 2003, a major restructuring of the NATO military commands began as the Headquarters of the Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic were abolished and a new command, Allied Command Transformation (ACT),[/b] was established in Norfolk, Virginia, United States, [quote]and the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) became the Headquarters of Allied Command Operations (ACO). ACT is responsible for driving transformation (future capabilities) in NATO, whilst ACO is responsible for current operations.
From that you can see who is pulling the strings of power.
02-28-2011 08:33 PM#4
ShadowMrs. Buckwheat
Posts: 13,527Joined: Feb 2011
RE: NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
U.S. repositions forces – The U.S. military is repositioning naval and air forces around Libya, a Pentagon official said Monday, as international demands intensify for an end to Gadhafi's decades-long rule.

It is moving some armed forces in the region near Libya in case they're needed, but is not saying what they might be needed for.

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/articl...libya?bn=1

Clinton: "Gaddafi must go"

http://www.jpost.com/International/Artic...?id=210209

damned.gif
03-01-2011 03:28 AM#5
ShadowMrs. Buckwheat
Posts: 13,527Joined: Feb 2011
RE: NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
Jeezus. Hillary wants to do to Libya what Bill did to Iraq.

“We’ve been reaching out to many different Libyans who are attempting to organize in the east and, as the revolution moves westward, there as well,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said today en route to Geneva, where she is due to meet with the foreign ministers of six major world powers to discuss imposing sanctions as well as a no fly zone on Libya.

As happened under Bill Clinton during years of sanctions against Iraq, such measures will only deepen the suffering of the population and will do nothing to avert the humanitarian crisis. They will however weaken Gaddafi’s political position, enhancing the swift success of any US-backed coup.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-encirc...libya.html

Gaddafi is being Saddamized.
03-01-2011 03:30 AM#6
ShadowMrs. Buckwheat
Posts: 13,527Joined: Feb 2011
RE: NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
A reminder....



03-02-2011 12:14 AM#7
yankeesskier
Posts: 6,198Joined: Feb 2011
RE: NATO Meets for Talks about Possible Military Intervention in Libya
Winner gets the oil.

Biere.
New reply
Home





Free TopSite


DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS)

Kritterbox.com - Current events, paranormal, UFO, conspiracy, politics, ancient lost treasure, ancient technology, tech, music and more! This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site. This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental. All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception. No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com. Fair Use Notice:This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion. Copyright © 20011 - 2016 kritterbox.com