(04-25-2018, 12:37 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:
(04-25-2018, 12:18 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote: "How can there be sources when no one is looking at it? Do you have a source for the dangers of touching hot stoves? Where the ƒück is the peer review support for that unverified claim???"
Your claim is also unverified, some references would be valued.
I am an inventor and owner of a patent pending, a trademark and copyrights. So let me explain to you how inventions come about. No one else has come up with the idea prior to me. That means you could not look up the Whirling Bliss Machine to find references for it prior to my invention. But the Machine exists and people are ordering it.
The same is true regarding our physiological reaction to positive ions. I've recognized a series of factors that are all proven on their own individually. I've tied them together. So you won't find someone else who has tied them together like I have.
Yet each element can be looked at and understood like you understand that touching a hot stove burns you. Frankly, we don't have time for someone to put together a study at this point. 5G is marching inexorably towards us. It's like the Roman Army headed towards us 500 yards away.
I have spelled it out for you. Find a flaw in what I've described. Saying that there are no studies is not a refutation, it is merely a recognition on your part that no one else has been saying this yet. If you can't find any errors or flaws, then you will also understand the magnitude of this problem. IOW, by this time next year, all of us will be dead.
If you see a flaw or error, let us know what it is.
I did point out an obvious flaw, and you got angry. There are no
positive ions any way associated with 5G signals.