#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


5G provides the extra
07-30-2019, 08:14 PM #16
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,443 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
(4 minutes ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(30 minutes ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(1 hour ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(2 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(07-26-2019, 08:43 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  It can be a deadly mistake to evaluate cell tower effects by relying on engineering assumptions. They assume certain wavelengths are safe and base their erroneous conclusions from there. But their assumptions happen to be wrong based on thousands of biological studies.

BTW, the video makes the same grotesque error a lot of other defenders of 5G make by confusing ionizing radiation (waves) with ions (particles) beginning at 4:47 in the video.

I'm tired of having to repeat the same critical corrections of your sources. Please search where your sources find an error in what I have said before repeating the same errors from different sources. It's still wrong regardless of how many clueless people make the same mistakes.

Also this thread started out as a thread regarding the effects of 5G on our weather. Can we keep it there?

Actually, you can't prove effects on our weather just as we can't prove anything else regarding 5G. Just saying.

If we lived in a world that denied the basics of physical science, as you are doing, what I've said would continue to be true anyway. Your position is akin to saying one can't prove turning lights switches on proves light switches turn on lights.

In a similar fashion, I have used my invention on a hundred or more cumulus and cumulonimbus clouds. In every single case without exception, the cloud is rapidly and dramatically altered, just like the light switch turns on the light every time. One time at the beach, the machine fell apart. This was during Hurricane Barry's activity in New Orleans, and we were getting the tail end of it. With 17 miles of beach in front and to the sides of me, the rain was reduced about 50%. In the time it took for me to pick up the parts, I was hit by hurricane force winds and nearly blown over while being pelted by a near deluge.

The invention is based on the same physical laws being utilized, and the results are 100%. Clouds that were relatively stationary and growing get turned into mere wisps or become small fractions of their former selves depending on how much time I spend and the thickness of the clouds.

The fact that the machine is so effective is also a proof of the ions and EMFs from 5G being the reason for the 100-fold increase in cloud formations. It is the only additional source of any magnitude for ions and EMFs unless you prefer to believe fairies have picked this particular time to make all those clouds.

But you have no proof of that scenario, do you! Meanwhile the telecom companies do in fact test their 5G systems and roll it out - unless you want to disbelieve them as well.

The problem is you are not performing tests in a controlled environment, therefore you can't make those claims.

You're completely missing the point because you're erroneously believing every process needs to have further study.

The science is confirmed regarding every aspect.

1. Clouds are made from cosmic rays, which are electromagnetic fields, striking ions.
2. 5G adds electromagnetic waves and ions to the air
3. Ions and electromagnetic waves respond to each other, not just some of the time but all the time and every time!

To require a controlled study about these already well known facts is like asking for a study to discover whether a hot stove can burn your finger. There is no study that proves hot stoves burn fingers, so I guess it doesn't happen! Or does it happen anyway?

Sometimes you can get away with touching a hot stove - but there is no time when ions and EMF's don't react.

Meanwhile, people are drowning in their cars, plus farms, businesses and homes are being destroyed because those three listed things are happening due to the addition of more ions and EMFs with 5G as the source. By the time your superfluous were set up and conducted, it's possible that most of the world's population would be starving or starved to death due to a lack of food.

I believe that for proof the experiment/test needs to be repeated by others with objectivity as well as in a controlled environment. That is just how I roll.
Below Average Genius Show this Post
07-30-2019, 10:27 PM #17
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(2 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(2 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(2 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(3 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(4 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Actually, you can't prove effects on our weather just as we can't prove anything else regarding 5G. Just saying.

If we lived in a world that denied the basics of physical science, as you are doing, what I've said would continue to be true anyway. Your position is akin to saying one can't prove turning lights switches on proves light switches turn on lights.

In a similar fashion, I have used my invention on a hundred or more cumulus and cumulonimbus clouds. In every single case without exception, the cloud is rapidly and dramatically altered, just like the light switch turns on the light every time. One time at the beach, the machine fell apart. This was during Hurricane Barry's activity in New Orleans, and we were getting the tail end of it. With 17 miles of beach in front and to the sides of me, the rain was reduced about 50%. In the time it took for me to pick up the parts, I was hit by hurricane force winds and nearly blown over while being pelted by a near deluge.

The invention is based on the same physical laws being utilized, and the results are 100%. Clouds that were relatively stationary and growing get turned into mere wisps or become small fractions of their former selves depending on how much time I spend and the thickness of the clouds.

The fact that the machine is so effective is also a proof of the ions and EMFs from 5G being the reason for the 100-fold increase in cloud formations. It is the only additional source of any magnitude for ions and EMFs unless you prefer to believe fairies have picked this particular time to make all those clouds.

But you have no proof of that scenario, do you! Meanwhile the telecom companies do in fact test their 5G systems and roll it out - unless you want to disbelieve them as well.

The problem is you are not performing tests in a controlled environment, therefore you can't make those claims.

You're completely missing the point because you're erroneously believing every process needs to have further study.

The science is confirmed regarding every aspect.

1. Clouds are made from cosmic rays, which are electromagnetic fields, striking ions.
2. 5G adds electromagnetic waves and ions to the air
3. Ions and electromagnetic waves respond to each other, not just some of the time but all the time and every time!

To require a controlled study about these already well known facts is like asking for a study to discover whether a hot stove can burn your finger. There is no study that proves hot stoves burn fingers, so I guess it doesn't happen! Or does it happen anyway?

Sometimes you can get away with touching a hot stove - but there is no time when ions and EMF's don't react.

Meanwhile, people are drowning in their cars, plus farms, businesses and homes are being destroyed because those three listed things are happening due to the addition of more ions and EMFs with 5G as the source. By the time your superfluous were set up and conducted, it's possible that most of the world's population would be starving or starved to death due to a lack of food.

I believe that for proof the experiment/test needs to be repeated by others with objectivity as well as in a controlled environment. That is just how I roll.

Which part of this don't you understand: EVERY PART of the experiment has been confirmed already!! Physical LAW (it a LAW - not a contention!!!) has not been placed on hold. 5G is not EXEMPT from those laws as have been explained to you more than once already.

Do you need to do a study of what would happen if you were to stick your wet tongue into a light socket that is turned on? Of course not! That's because you're dealing with electricity. Electricity works the same way EVERY TIME.

Likewise ions ALWAYS react to other ions. They are either attracted or repelled depending on the charges of the ions.

Oxygen and hydrogen ions always react to the sun's rays because those rays are ELECTROmagnetic. This doesn't happen just some of the time - it happens 100% of the time!

Ions react to ALL ions. So when 5G adds ions to the mix, a reaction ALWAYS takes place. 5G does not have a special exemption to this PHYSICAL LAW.

My own testing works 100% of the time because it is working under those physical laws.
08-06-2019, 05:24 PM #18
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,443 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
The main ingredient for cloud formation seems to be aerosols in the atmosphere as per the hypothesis below, without that no amount of ionization will cause the degree of cloud formation you are claiming is achieved by 5G or your machine. So, essentially, if we add more aerosols into the atmosphere, hypothetically, we could cool the planet.

Quote:The hypothesis in a nutshell

Cosmic rays, high-energy particles raining down from exploded stars, knock electrons out of air molecules. This produces ions, that is, positive and negative molecules in the atmosphere.
The ions help aerosols -- clusters of mainly sulphuric acid and water molecules -- to form and become stable against evaporation. This process is called nucleation. The small aerosols need to grow nearly a million times in mass in order to have an effect on clouds.
The second role of ions is that they accelerate the growth of the small aerosols into cloud condensation nuclei -- seeds on which liquid water droplets form to make clouds. The more ions the more aerosols become cloud condensation nuclei. It is this second property of ions which is the new result published in Nature Communications.
Low clouds made with liquid water droplets cool the Earth's surface.
Variations in the Sun's magnetic activity alter the influx of cosmic rays to the Earth.
When the Sun is lazy, magnetically speaking, there are more cosmic rays and more low clouds, and the world is cooler.
When the Sun is active fewer cosmic rays reach the Earth and, with fewer low clouds, the world warms up.

http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphe...louds.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...091320.htm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/news/2011/102_0721.html
Below Average Genius Show this Post
08-10-2019, 01:10 AM #19
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(08-06-2019, 05:24 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The main ingredient for cloud formation seems to be aerosols in the atmosphere as per the hypothesis below, without that no amount of ionization will cause the degree of cloud formation you are claiming is achieved by 5G or your machine. So, essentially, if we add more aerosols into the atmosphere, hypothetically, we could cool the planet.

Quote:The hypothesis in a nutshell

   Cosmic rays, high-energy particles raining down from exploded stars, knock electrons out of air molecules. This produces ions, that is, positive and negative molecules in the atmosphere.
   The ions help aerosols -- clusters of mainly sulphuric acid and water molecules -- to form and become stable against evaporation. This process is called nucleation. The small aerosols need to grow nearly a million times in mass in order to have an effect on clouds.
   The second role of ions is that they accelerate the growth of the small aerosols into cloud condensation nuclei -- seeds on which liquid water droplets form to make clouds. The more ions the more aerosols become cloud condensation nuclei. It is this second property of ions which is the new result published in Nature Communications.
   Low clouds made with liquid water droplets cool the Earth's surface.
   Variations in the Sun's magnetic activity alter the influx of cosmic rays to the Earth.
   When the Sun is lazy, magnetically speaking, there are more cosmic rays and more low clouds, and the world is cooler.
   When the Sun is active fewer cosmic rays reach the Earth and, with fewer low clouds, the world warms up.

http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphe...louds.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...091320.htm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/news/2011/102_0721.html

It was Nikola Tesla who said the opposing force of gravity is an EMF. EMFs can lift trains into the air.

Have you ever sprayed an aerosol where the spray floated off into space? Call the Guiness Book of Records if that ever happens because 100% of an aerosol will fall to earth because even with the finest mist, the spray is heavier than air because it is mostly water, with a density of 997 kg per cubic meter, whereas air's density is only a little over 1 kg per cubic meter.

Sulfuric acid is also denser than air.

Yet the aerosols of clouds float and can go in the opposite direction of gravity. So it's not the aerosol that has the ability to form a cloud and take it aloft - it's the EMF's. Aerosols have zero properties to maintain a cloud formation without EMFs.

IOW, EMFs and ions give shape to the clouds and allow them to float above the earth, thereby defying gravity.
08-11-2019, 04:49 PM #20
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,443 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
(Yesterday, 12:10 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(08-06-2019, 04:24 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The main ingredient for cloud formation seems to be aerosols in the atmosphere as per the hypothesis below, without that no amount of ionization will cause the degree of cloud formation you are claiming is achieved by 5G or your machine. So, essentially, if we add more aerosols into the atmosphere, hypothetically, we could cool the planet.

Quote:The hypothesis in a nutshell

   Cosmic rays, high-energy particles raining down from exploded stars, knock electrons out of air molecules. This produces ions, that is, positive and negative molecules in the atmosphere.
   The ions help aerosols -- clusters of mainly sulphuric acid and water molecules -- to form and become stable against evaporation. This process is called nucleation. The small aerosols need to grow nearly a million times in mass in order to have an effect on clouds.
   The second role of ions is that they accelerate the growth of the small aerosols into cloud condensation nuclei -- seeds on which liquid water droplets form to make clouds. The more ions the more aerosols become cloud condensation nuclei. It is this second property of ions which is the new result published in Nature Communications.
   Low clouds made with liquid water droplets cool the Earth's surface.
   Variations in the Sun's magnetic activity alter the influx of cosmic rays to the Earth.
   When the Sun is lazy, magnetically speaking, there are more cosmic rays and more low clouds, and the world is cooler.
   When the Sun is active fewer cosmic rays reach the Earth and, with fewer low clouds, the world warms up.

http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphe...louds.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...091320.htm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/news/2011/102_0721.html

It was Nikola Tesla who said the opposing force of gravity is an EMF. EMFs can lift trains into the air.

Have you ever sprayed an aerosol where the spray floated off into space? Call the Guiness Book of Records if that ever happens because 100% of an aerosol will fall to earth because even with the finest mist, the spray is heavier than air because it is mostly water, with a density of 997 kg per cubic meter, whereas air's density is only a little over 1 kg per cubic meter.

Sulfuric acid is also denser than air.

Yet the aerosols of clouds float and can go in the opposite direction of gravity. So it's not the aerosol that has the ability to form a cloud and take it aloft - it's the EMF's. Aerosols have zero properties to maintain a cloud formation without EMFs.

IOW, EMFs and ions give shape to the clouds and allow them to float above the earth, thereby defying gravity.

Can you find proof where Tesla did that?

You didn't bother reading the science I posted, did you?
Below Average Genius Show this Post
08-12-2019, 02:25 AM #21
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(9 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(08-10-2019, 01:10 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(08-06-2019, 05:24 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The main ingredient for cloud formation seems to be aerosols in the atmosphere as per the hypothesis below, without that no amount of ionization will cause the degree of cloud formation you are claiming is achieved by 5G or your machine. So, essentially, if we add more aerosols into the atmosphere, hypothetically, we could cool the planet.

Quote:The hypothesis in a nutshell

   Cosmic rays, high-energy particles raining down from exploded stars, knock electrons out of air molecules. This produces ions, that is, positive and negative molecules in the atmosphere.
   The ions help aerosols -- clusters of mainly sulphuric acid and water molecules -- to form and become stable against evaporation. This process is called nucleation. The small aerosols need to grow nearly a million times in mass in order to have an effect on clouds.
   The second role of ions is that they accelerate the growth of the small aerosols into cloud condensation nuclei -- seeds on which liquid water droplets form to make clouds. The more ions the more aerosols become cloud condensation nuclei. It is this second property of ions which is the new result published in Nature Communications.
   Low clouds made with liquid water droplets cool the Earth's surface.
   Variations in the Sun's magnetic activity alter the influx of cosmic rays to the Earth.
   When the Sun is lazy, magnetically speaking, there are more cosmic rays and more low clouds, and the world is cooler.
   When the Sun is active fewer cosmic rays reach the Earth and, with fewer low clouds, the world warms up.

http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphe...louds.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...091320.htm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/news/2011/102_0721.html

It was Nikola Tesla who said the opposing force of gravity is an EMF. EMFs can lift trains into the air.

Have you ever sprayed an aerosol where the spray floated off into space? Call the Guiness Book of Records if that ever happens because 100% of an aerosol will fall to earth because even with the finest mist, the spray is heavier than air because it is mostly water, with a density of 997 kg per cubic meter, whereas air's density is only a little over 1 kg per cubic meter.

Sulfuric acid is also denser than air.

Yet the aerosols of clouds float and can go in the opposite direction of gravity. So it's not the aerosol that has the ability to form a cloud and take it aloft - it's the EMF's. Aerosols have zero properties to maintain a cloud formation without EMFs.

IOW, EMFs and ions give shape to the clouds and allow them to float above the earth, thereby defying gravity.

Can you find proof where Tesla did that?

You didn't bother reading the science I posted, did you?

If you don't want to believe Tesla, who was the greatest electrical sciencist of the past 150 years, maybe something simple would be more your speed. Take two tuning forks tuned to C. Strike one and then hold the other one nearby. The second fork will vibrate due to the resonance. A opera snger can shatter glass by singing perfect notes in resonance with the glass.

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge is the most famous example of resonance destroying a structure unless one prefers the story of Jericho using horns to bring down the walls..

Why read the so-called science if the claims are in contradiction to what my invention is able to do 100% of the time using a model that contradicts theirs? It's like the science that claimed bees couldn't fly. Bees do fly.
08-12-2019, 03:48 AM #22
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,443 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
(1 hour ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(10 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(08-10-2019, 12:10 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(08-06-2019, 04:24 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The main ingredient for cloud formation seems to be aerosols in the atmosphere as per the hypothesis below, without that no amount of ionization will cause the degree of cloud formation you are claiming is achieved by 5G or your machine. So, essentially, if we add more aerosols into the atmosphere, hypothetically, we could cool the planet.

Quote:The hypothesis in a nutshell

   Cosmic rays, high-energy particles raining down from exploded stars, knock electrons out of air molecules. This produces ions, that is, positive and negative molecules in the atmosphere.
   The ions help aerosols -- clusters of mainly sulphuric acid and water molecules -- to form and become stable against evaporation. This process is called nucleation. The small aerosols need to grow nearly a million times in mass in order to have an effect on clouds.
   The second role of ions is that they accelerate the growth of the small aerosols into cloud condensation nuclei -- seeds on which liquid water droplets form to make clouds. The more ions the more aerosols become cloud condensation nuclei. It is this second property of ions which is the new result published in Nature Communications.
   Low clouds made with liquid water droplets cool the Earth's surface.
   Variations in the Sun's magnetic activity alter the influx of cosmic rays to the Earth.
   When the Sun is lazy, magnetically speaking, there are more cosmic rays and more low clouds, and the world is cooler.
   When the Sun is active fewer cosmic rays reach the Earth and, with fewer low clouds, the world warms up.

http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphe...louds.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...091320.htm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/news/2011/102_0721.html

It was Nikola Tesla who said the opposing force of gravity is an EMF. EMFs can lift trains into the air.

Have you ever sprayed an aerosol where the spray floated off into space? Call the Guiness Book of Records if that ever happens because 100% of an aerosol will fall to earth because even with the finest mist, the spray is heavier than air because it is mostly water, with a density of 997 kg per cubic meter, whereas air's density is only a little over 1 kg per cubic meter.

Sulfuric acid is also denser than air.

Yet the aerosols of clouds float and can go in the opposite direction of gravity. So it's not the aerosol that has the ability to form a cloud and take it aloft - it's the EMF's. Aerosols have zero properties to maintain a cloud formation without EMFs.

IOW, EMFs and ions give shape to the clouds and allow them to float above the earth, thereby defying gravity.

Can you find proof where Tesla did that?

You didn't bother reading the science I posted, did you?

If you don't want to believe Tesla, who was the greatest electrical sciencist of the past 150 years, maybe something simple would be more your speed. Take two tuning forks tuned to C. Strike one and then hold the other one nearby. The second fork will vibrate due to the resonance. A opera snger can shatter glass by singing perfect notes in resonance with the glass.

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge is the most famous example of resonance destroying a structure unless one prefers the story of Jericho using horns to bring down the walls..

Why read the so-called science if the claims are in contradiction to what my invention is able to do 100% of the time using a model that contradicts theirs? It's like the science that claimed bees couldn't fly. Bees do fly.

Your ions are not resonance as one would feel or think of as sound.

I do believe in Tesla, I just don't believe in your touting his undocumented achievements/fantasies. Did any of them include his bird?
Below Average Genius Show this Post
08-12-2019, 03:57 AM #23
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(8 minutes ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(1 hour ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(11 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(08-10-2019, 01:10 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(08-06-2019, 05:24 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The main ingredient for cloud formation seems to be aerosols in the atmosphere as per the hypothesis below, without that no amount of ionization will cause the degree of cloud formation you are claiming is achieved by 5G or your machine. So, essentially, if we add more aerosols into the atmosphere, hypothetically, we could cool the planet.


http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphe...louds.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...091320.htm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/news/2011/102_0721.html

It was Nikola Tesla who said the opposing force of gravity is an EMF. EMFs can lift trains into the air.

Have you ever sprayed an aerosol where the spray floated off into space? Call the Guiness Book of Records if that ever happens because 100% of an aerosol will fall to earth because even with the finest mist, the spray is heavier than air because it is mostly water, with a density of 997 kg per cubic meter, whereas air's density is only a little over 1 kg per cubic meter.

Sulfuric acid is also denser than air.

Yet the aerosols of clouds float and can go in the opposite direction of gravity. So it's not the aerosol that has the ability to form a cloud and take it aloft - it's the EMF's. Aerosols have zero properties to maintain a cloud formation without EMFs.

IOW, EMFs and ions give shape to the clouds and allow them to float above the earth, thereby defying gravity.

Can you find proof where Tesla did that?

You didn't bother reading the science I posted, did you?

If you don't want to believe Tesla, who was the greatest electrical sciencist of the past 150 years, maybe something simple would be more your speed. Take two tuning forks tuned to C. Strike one and then hold the other one nearby. The second fork will vibrate due to the resonance. A opera snger can shatter glass by singing perfect notes in resonance with the glass.

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge is the most famous example of resonance destroying a structure unless one prefers the story of Jericho using horns to bring down the walls..

Why read the so-called science if the claims are in contradiction to what my invention is able to do 100% of the time using a model that contradicts theirs? It's like the science that claimed bees couldn't fly. Bees do fly.

Your ions are not resonance as one would feel or think of as sound.

I do believe in Tesla, I just don't believe in your touting his undocumented achievements/fantasies. Did any of them include his bird?

Sigh. When it comes to clouds, the resonance comes from the EMFs, although everything does resonate, some more and some less. There is nothing in this universe that doesn't resonate.

Resonance is anything but a fantasy. If it makes you feel better to believe that the greatest electrical genius of his time was fantasizing about something that is widely recognized as a scientific fact: namely resonance, be my guest.
08-12-2019, 04:09 AM #24
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,443 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
(12 minutes ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(21 minutes ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(1 hour ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(11 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(08-10-2019, 12:10 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  It was Nikola Tesla who said the opposing force of gravity is an EMF. EMFs can lift trains into the air.

Have you ever sprayed an aerosol where the spray floated off into space? Call the Guiness Book of Records if that ever happens because 100% of an aerosol will fall to earth because even with the finest mist, the spray is heavier than air because it is mostly water, with a density of 997 kg per cubic meter, whereas air's density is only a little over 1 kg per cubic meter.

Sulfuric acid is also denser than air.

Yet the aerosols of clouds float and can go in the opposite direction of gravity. So it's not the aerosol that has the ability to form a cloud and take it aloft - it's the EMF's. Aerosols have zero properties to maintain a cloud formation without EMFs.

IOW, EMFs and ions give shape to the clouds and allow them to float above the earth, thereby defying gravity.

Can you find proof where Tesla did that?

You didn't bother reading the science I posted, did you?

If you don't want to believe Tesla, who was the greatest electrical sciencist of the past 150 years, maybe something simple would be more your speed. Take two tuning forks tuned to C. Strike one and then hold the other one nearby. The second fork will vibrate due to the resonance. A opera snger can shatter glass by singing perfect notes in resonance with the glass.

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge is the most famous example of resonance destroying a structure unless one prefers the story of Jericho using horns to bring down the walls..

Why read the so-called science if the claims are in contradiction to what my invention is able to do 100% of the time using a model that contradicts theirs? It's like the science that claimed bees couldn't fly. Bees do fly.

Your ions are not resonance as one would feel or think of as sound.

I do believe in Tesla, I just don't believe in your touting his undocumented achievements/fantasies. Did any of them include his bird?

Sigh. When it comes to clouds, the resonance comes from the EMFs, although everything does resonate, some more and some less. There is nothing in this universe that doesn't resonate.

Resonance is anything but a fantasy. If it makes you feel better to believe that the greatest electrical genius of his time was fantasizing about something that is widely recognized as a scientific fact: namely resonance, be my guest.

Without proof, it is all fantasy.
Below Average Genius Show this Post
08-12-2019, 07:46 AM #25
Below Average Genius Incognito Anonymous
 
(3 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(3 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(3 hours ago)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(5 hours ago)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(Yesterday, 04:49 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Can you find proof where Tesla did that?

You didn't bother reading the science I posted, did you?

If you don't want to believe Tesla, who was the greatest electrical sciencist of the past 150 years, maybe something simple would be more your speed. Take two tuning forks tuned to C. Strike one and then hold the other one nearby. The second fork will vibrate due to the resonance. A opera snger can shatter glass by singing perfect notes in resonance with the glass.

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge is the most famous example of resonance destroying a structure unless one prefers the story of Jericho using horns to bring down the walls..

Why read the so-called science if the claims are in contradiction to what my invention is able to do 100% of the time using a model that contradicts theirs? It's like the science that claimed bees couldn't fly. Bees do fly.

Your ions are not resonance as one would feel or think of as sound.

I do believe in Tesla, I just don't believe in your touting his undocumented achievements/fantasies. Did any of them include his bird?

Sigh. When it comes to clouds, the resonance comes from the EMFs, although everything does resonate, some more and some less. There is nothing in this universe that doesn't resonate.

Resonance is anything but a fantasy. If it makes you feel better to believe that the greatest electrical genius of his time was fantasizing about something that is widely recognized as a scientific fact: namely resonance, be my guest.

Without proof, it is all fantasy.

Is English a second language for you because "fantasy" doesn't mean what you think it means. Just because you don't have proof that I live in Florida, that doesn't make it a fantasy. Its simply means you have an ignorance about that fact. Ignorance simply means we are unaware of a particular thing that happens to be true.

If you're unaware of the properties of resonance, that does not make it a fantasy, either.

I have proof that the Cloud Tapper dramatically alters storm clouds 100% of the time. Just because you haven't seen it, it simply means you have an ignorance about it. You have the option to come here and see it for yourself with one requirement. After you see it for yourself you agree to report what you see.

I did run into one person out of the many it's been demonstrated to who refused to look at the cloud more than second or two and then claimed he didn't see anything. And then so much of the cloud was altered he had to admit it anyway.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com