#Login Register


  • 4 Vote(s) - 4 Average
Home 


A head scratcher...
07-04-2014, 11:41 AM #16
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,607 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
I know for a fact I would be a crappy slave. Probably burned on the stake for refusal to comply and trouble making İmage 13.gif

chuckle.gif drinking.gif
07-04-2014, 11:59 AM #17
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
well what are you going to do? if the us constitution falls, we are effen doomed.. maybe i could come and live with you in your sauna?? i dont know how i will get to finland cause there will be no planes, the us is the only country with planes.. maybe i will row in a canoe i make from used water bottles.. yeah, that will work.. lmao.gif
07-04-2014, 12:07 PM #18
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,607 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
A plastic bottle canoe is a wonderful and environmentally friendly way to travel. lmao.gif But I think you're safe where you're at. If not, sure you can come live in the sauna. chuckle.gif
07-05-2014, 09:12 AM #19
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,789 Threads:137 Joined:Apr 2013
(07-04-2014, 11:59 AM)the white ribbon Wrote:  well what are you going to do? if the us constitution falls, we are effen doomed.. maybe i could come and live with you in your sauna?? i dont know how i will get to finland cause there will be no planes, the us is the only country with planes.. maybe i will row in a canoe i make from used water bottles.. yeah, that will work.. lmao.gif

Where was the airplane first invented? Ah, it was the USA. Why was it invented in the USA? Because patent protection is the bomb!

The inventors of the first planes were seeking financial reward for their inventions and patents helped to protect their inventions.

Thanks for illustrating how the US Constitution made it possible for people all over the world to fly in planes. You're the best! The world would not have had planes or jets either if the US hadn't been invented.

Pray for me. hug.gif
07-05-2014, 09:44 AM #20
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(07-05-2014, 09:12 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  The world would not have had planes or jets either if the US hadn't been invented.

rofl.gifrofl.gifrofl.gifrofl.gifrofl.gif

classic..
07-05-2014, 02:27 PM #21
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(07-05-2014, 09:12 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  The world would not have had planes or jets either if the US hadn't been invented.

well, it looks like Europe were ahead of the game when it came to planes.. wouldnt have had planes if its wasnt for the US? rofl.gifrofl.gifrofl.gif

sorry, i cant help myself.. you make it so easy..

Quote:The first fixed-wing aircraft: The 14-bis versus the Wright Flyers

Flight of Santos Dumont, Le Petit Journal, 25 November 1906
Mainstream aviation historians credit the Wright Brothers with the creation of the first successful heavier-than-air flying machine, able to take off under its own power and capable of sustained and controlled flight.

The Wrights used a launching rail for their 1903 flights and a launch catapult for their 1904 and 1905 machines, while the aircraft of Santos-Dumont and other Europeans had wheeled undercarriages. The Wright Brothers continued to use skids, which necessitated the use of a dolly running on a track. The Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, founded in France in 1905 to verify aviation records, stated among its rules that an aircraft should be able to take off under its own power in order to qualify for a record. Supporters of Santos-Dumont maintain that this means the 14-bis was, technically, the first successful fixed-wing aircraft.

The issue of which aircraft was first or more practical is a matter of debate between supporters of Santos-Dumont and the Wright brothers. The Wrights flew earlier with no official witness, and Santos-Dumont took off on wheels before the Wrights did, earning a variety of prizes and official records in France. Santos-Dumont's flights in the 14-bis contributed to the development of aviation by publicly demonstrating the feasibility of heavier-than-air flight, which encouraged other pioneers in Europe to begin or quicken the pace of their experiments.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Santos-Dumont
failboat Show this Post
07-05-2014, 03:10 PM #22
failboat Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-03-2014, 09:49 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  Why is it illegal to feed wild animals because they become dependent and dangerous towards humans for their food, but we are required to feed wild people through food stamps?

Don't the wild people become dependent and dangerous, too?

wtf2.gif coffeetime.gif

what's your problem? are you afraid to miss out? to get a raw deal? lol.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-05-2014, 03:29 PM #23
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-04-2014, 09:04 AM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(07-03-2014, 10:05 PM)Octo Wrote:  Wild people? I would say those are indigenous tribes that can feed themselves perfectly fine without us. I think those people you refer to are more feral than wild. 13.gif

he was meaning the less fortunate people of his country, you know the ones that get stuck being paid well below world standards in wages, and have to rely on a socialist program to feed themselves and their children..

"let them eat cake" 13.gif13.gif
ezrin here.
absolutely true story.
ran 11.4 mi on 4th
3.2 mi home to forest preserve.
5.0 mi in preserve then back home again.
was approaching the 'park-like' region, next to the lake, when i heard multiple peoples extremely lound hoopin' and hollerin' like a pack of hyenas.
my 1st thought was a large fight/riot of some sort.
it was a large group of african-americans picnicing.
they were all dressed-up in bright, upscale urban clothing.
i viewed a few non-black people that likewise trying to enjoy the Preserve.
i could read their expressions... WTF!!!

so... went home made pad thai for dinner went for evening walk around lake with dogs.
the picnicers had driven their cars into the prohibited area so that they could more easily load-up for trip home.

one of the cars was a cherry-red 70's buick convertible black interior.
2 men and a woman were standing next to the car.
i commented, "...it's beautiful...."
the only reaction i got was the woman turned her head towards me, and glared.
i read her mind...

so's what my point....????
you decide.
07-05-2014, 03:36 PM #24
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(07-05-2014, 03:29 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  so's what my point....????
you decide.

white men cant jump? 13.gif13.gif
07-05-2014, 04:29 PM #25
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,898 Threads:420 Joined:Jun 2012
Quote:so's what my point....????
you decide.

You've never been to a really good party picnic?
07-05-2014, 04:54 PM #26
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,607 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Bright, upscale urban clothing is not appropriate for picnics? 13.gif
failboat Show this Post
07-05-2014, 05:03 PM #27
failboat Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-05-2014, 03:29 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-04-2014, 09:04 AM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(07-03-2014, 10:05 PM)Octo Wrote:  Wild people? I would say those are indigenous tribes that can feed themselves perfectly fine without us. I think those people you refer to are more feral than wild. 13.gif

he was meaning the less fortunate people of his country, you know the ones that get stuck being paid well below world standards in wages, and have to rely on a socialist program to feed themselves and their children..

"let them eat cake" 13.gif13.gif
ezrin here.
absolutely true story.
ran 11.4 mi on 4th
3.2 mi home to forest preserve.
5.0 mi in preserve then back home again.
was approaching the 'park-like' region, next to the lake, when i heard multiple peoples extremely lound hoopin' and hollerin' like a pack of hyenas.
my 1st thought was a large fight/riot of some sort.
it was a large group of african-americans picnicing.
they were all dressed-up in bright, upscale urban clothing.
i viewed a few non-black people that likewise trying to enjoy the Preserve.
i could read their expressions... WTF!!!

so... went home made pad thai for dinner went for evening walk around lake with dogs.
the picnicers had driven their cars into the prohibited area so that they could more easily load-up for trip home.

one of the cars was a cherry-red 70's buick convertible black interior.
2 men and a woman were standing next to the car.
i commented, "...it's beautiful...."
the only reaction i got was the woman turned her head towards me, and glared.
i read her mind...

so's what my point....????
you decide.

i don't get it.
07-05-2014, 05:05 PM #28
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,607 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
lol.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-05-2014, 07:45 PM #29
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-05-2014, 04:29 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
Quote:so's what my point....????
you decide.

You've never been to a really good party picnic?

gaah.gif private party on private property.... knock yourself out.

private party on public property... de·co·rum diˈkôrəm
noun
behavior in keeping with good taste and propriety.
"you exhibit remarkable modesty and decorum"
synonyms: propriety, seemliness, decency, good taste, correctness

İmage
rofl.gif
07-05-2014, 08:07 PM #30
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,607 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Oh come on, there will always be loud asses of all colors in all places.

The law is pretty straight forward here;

Quote:In Finland, the freedom to roam and related rights are called "jokamiehenoikeus" in Finnish and "allemansrätten" in Swedish, literally translated as "every man's rights", similar to other Nordic countries.

Everyone may walk, ski or cycle freely in the countryside where this does not harm the natural environment or the landowner, except in gardens or in the immediate vicinity of people's homes (yards). Fields and plantations, which may easily be harmed, may usually not be crossed except in the winter.

One may stay or set up camp temporarily in the countryside, a reasonable distance from homes, pick mineral samples, wild berries, mushrooms and flowers (as long as they are not protected species). One may fish with a rod and line (only still waters), row, sail or use a motorboat on waterways (with certain restrictions), and swim or bathe in both inland waters and the sea. One can walk, ski and ice fish on frozen lakes, rivers and the sea. Income from selling picked berries or mushrooms is tax-free. Picking cloudberry may be temporarily restricted in parts of Lapland.

One may not disturb others or damage property, disturb breeding birds (or their nests or young), or disturb reindeer or game animals. One may not cut down or damage living trees, or collect wood, moss or lichen on other people's property, nor may one light open fires without the landowner's permission (except in an emergency). It is acceptable, however, to use an alcohol burner, wood stove or similar device that has no hot parts touching the ground. One may not disturb the privacy of people's homes by camping too near to them or making too much noise, nor litter, drive motor vehicles off road without the landowner's permission, or fish (excluding angling) or hunt without the relevant permits.[2] In the autonomous province of Åland the right to camp is not recognized.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com