#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


And the new papal name makes 666
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
03-14-2013, 01:33 AM #1
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 
From a Post at LoP:

The seven Papal names used since 1798

1. Twelve Pope's using the name Pius
2. Thirteen Pope's using the name Leo
3. Sixteen Pope's using the name Gregory
4. Fifteen Pope's using the name Benedict (while Benedict XVI remains, but there will be only 14 once he changes his name)
5. Twenty One Pope's using the name John
6. Six Pope's using the name Paul
7. Two Pope's using the name John Paul


Now count them up name by name:


1. Pius 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12 = 78
2. Leo 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13 = 91
3. Gregory 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16 = 136
4. Benedict 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14 = 105
5. John 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+1​7+18+19+20+21 = 231
6. Paul 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21
7. John Paul 1+2 = 3

78 + 91 + 136 + 105 + 231 + 21 + 3 = 665
as of John Paul II,

Meaning, the next pope will be a new papal name (which by definition has a count of 1), making a count of 1 + 665 = 666 man

However, Benedict XVI causes the count to run over 666 and, in fact, as of the writing of this paragraph (April 29, 2005), the count total of the seven Papal names used since 1798 is 680. Benedict XVI adds 15 to the count because they skipped Benedict X, so he is not the sixteenth pope in the Benedict series, but actually is the fifteenth pope in that series.

Does this mean the prophecy is wrong? No. How can that be when the count is over 666? The Bible tells us in the original Greek that the eighth comes out of the seven. He is not said to be a head or a mountain, and Greek experts say that the grammar precludes him being either a head or a mountain. Therefore, to be the eighth of a series, he must be the eighth king. The seven kings each have names that they are associated with, so the word "king" represents the names of these kings. The eighth king also has a name which the word "king" is associated with. The only logical conclusion then is that the eighth king will come out of the seven by starting out with a name from among the seven, and then changes names to a unique name never before used in Papal history. This name will reveal his true character in some way, for names are associated with character in the Bible. The count total of 680 will then work like this:

John Paul II adds 2 to the count total which then stands at 665.

Benedict XVI adds 15 to the count total which now equals 680.

Benedict XVI changes his papal name, so we subtract 15 from the count total. The count total then stands at 665.

Benedict XVI’s new name will be a new Papal name never before used in Papal history, this new name will add a count of 1 to the count total. Then 665 + 1 = 666.

Or mathematically:

Papal Name Count Added Count Total
John Paul II 2 663 + 2 = 665
Benedict XVI 15 665 + 15 = 680
Subtract for removing Benedict XVI name -15 680 - 15 = 665
Add 1 for a new Papal name 1 665 + 1 = 666

---
And it's the 2nd beast of Revelation 13 that causes all to take the mark; not the antichrist, as prophecy movies portray.

Yeah, this pope is going to cause a lot of problems for Protestants.

damned.gif

03-14-2013, 01:37 AM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,367 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
Thanks for reminding me I have math homework for tomorrow, gaah.gif
03-14-2013, 01:39 AM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,578 Threads:1,444 Joined:Feb 2011
The Oxyrhynchus Papyrus is the oldest known copy of the Book of Revelation. Close examination of this fragment indicates the mark of the beast is 616, not 666. If the mark is, cryptically, Hebrew letters, and not Greek, then the numeric value is 436.

http://heavenawaits.wordpress.com/616-not-666/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast

Not worried. coffeetime.gif

wonder.gif
03-14-2013, 01:42 AM #4
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(03-14-2013, 01:33 AM)Lisa Boxx Wrote:  From a Post at LoP:

The seven Papal names used since 1798

1. Twelve Pope's using the name Pius
2. Thirteen Pope's using the name Leo
3. Sixteen Pope's using the name Gregory
4. Fifteen Pope's using the name Benedict (while Benedict XVI remains, but there will be only 14 once he changes his name)
5. Twenty One Pope's using the name John
6. Six Pope's using the name Paul
7. Two Pope's using the name John Paul


Now count them up name by name:


1. Pius 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12 = 78
2. Leo 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13 = 91
3. Gregory 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16 = 136
4. Benedict 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14 = 105
5. John 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+1​7+18+19+20+21 = 231
6. Paul 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21
7. John Paul 1+2 = 3

78 + 91 + 136 + 105 + 231 + 21 + 3 = 665
as of John Paul II,

Meaning, the next pope will be a new papal name (which by definition has a count of 1), making a count of 1 + 665 = 666 man

However, Benedict XVI causes the count to run over 666 and, in fact, as of the writing of this paragraph (April 29, 2005), the count total of the seven Papal names used since 1798 is 680. Benedict XVI adds 15 to the count because they skipped Benedict X, so he is not the sixteenth pope in the Benedict series, but actually is the fifteenth pope in that series.

Does this mean the prophecy is wrong? No. How can that be when the count is over 666? The Bible tells us in the original Greek that the eighth comes out of the seven. He is not said to be a head or a mountain, and Greek experts say that the grammar precludes him being either a head or a mountain. Therefore, to be the eighth of a series, he must be the eighth king. The seven kings each have names that they are associated with, so the word "king" represents the names of these kings. The eighth king also has a name which the word "king" is associated with. The only logical conclusion then is that the eighth king will come out of the seven by starting out with a name from among the seven, and then changes names to a unique name never before used in Papal history. This name will reveal his true character in some way, for names are associated with character in the Bible. The count total of 680 will then work like this:

John Paul II adds 2 to the count total which then stands at 665.

Benedict XVI adds 15 to the count total which now equals 680.

Benedict XVI changes his papal name, so we subtract 15 from the count total. The count total then stands at 665.

Benedict XVI’s new name will be a new Papal name never before used in Papal history, this new name will add a count of 1 to the count total. Then 665 + 1 = 666.

Or mathematically:

Papal Name Count Added Count Total
John Paul II 2 663 + 2 = 665
Benedict XVI 15 665 + 15 = 680
Subtract for removing Benedict XVI name -15 680 - 15 = 665
Add 1 for a new Papal name 1 665 + 1 = 666

---
And it's the 2nd beast of Revelation 13 that causes all to take the mark; not the antichrist, as prophecy movies portray.

Yeah, this pope is going to cause a lot of problems for Protestants.

damned.gif


Dude I didnt know you were a woman

13.gif
03-14-2013, 01:45 AM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,367 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
We're all bros here. chuckle.gif
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
03-14-2013, 01:47 AM #6
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-14-2013, 01:39 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  The Oxyrhynchus Papyrus is the oldest known copy of the Book of Revelation. Close examination of this fragment indicates the mark of the beast is 616, not 666. If the mark is, cryptically, Hebrew letters, and not Greek, then the numeric value is 436.

http://heavenawaits.wordpress.com/616-not-666/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast

Not worried. coffeetime.gif


Yeah. 666 is the number of the name of the beast. My post probably sums it up right.

I worry about going with 616, cause I try to stay away from what they call "extra Biblical theology."

But I still love ya.

cheers.gif
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
03-14-2013, 01:48 AM #7
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-14-2013, 01:42 AM)I⊥∀NIW∩LLIʞ Wrote:  
(03-14-2013, 01:33 AM)Lisa Boxx Wrote:  From a Post at LoP:

The seven Papal names used since 1798

1. Twelve Pope's using the name Pius
2. Thirteen Pope's using the name Leo
3. Sixteen Pope's using the name Gregory
4. Fifteen Pope's using the name Benedict (while Benedict XVI remains, but there will be only 14 once he changes his name)
5. Twenty One Pope's using the name John
6. Six Pope's using the name Paul
7. Two Pope's using the name John Paul


Now count them up name by name:


1. Pius 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12 = 78
2. Leo 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13 = 91
3. Gregory 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16 = 136
4. Benedict 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14 = 105
5. John 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+1​7+18+19+20+21 = 231
6. Paul 1+2+3+4+5+6 = 21
7. John Paul 1+2 = 3

78 + 91 + 136 + 105 + 231 + 21 + 3 = 665
as of John Paul II,

Meaning, the next pope will be a new papal name (which by definition has a count of 1), making a count of 1 + 665 = 666 man

However, Benedict XVI causes the count to run over 666 and, in fact, as of the writing of this paragraph (April 29, 2005), the count total of the seven Papal names used since 1798 is 680. Benedict XVI adds 15 to the count because they skipped Benedict X, so he is not the sixteenth pope in the Benedict series, but actually is the fifteenth pope in that series.

Does this mean the prophecy is wrong? No. How can that be when the count is over 666? The Bible tells us in the original Greek that the eighth comes out of the seven. He is not said to be a head or a mountain, and Greek experts say that the grammar precludes him being either a head or a mountain. Therefore, to be the eighth of a series, he must be the eighth king. The seven kings each have names that they are associated with, so the word "king" represents the names of these kings. The eighth king also has a name which the word "king" is associated with. The only logical conclusion then is that the eighth king will come out of the seven by starting out with a name from among the seven, and then changes names to a unique name never before used in Papal history. This name will reveal his true character in some way, for names are associated with character in the Bible. The count total of 680 will then work like this:

John Paul II adds 2 to the count total which then stands at 665.

Benedict XVI adds 15 to the count total which now equals 680.

Benedict XVI changes his papal name, so we subtract 15 from the count total. The count total then stands at 665.

Benedict XVI’s new name will be a new Papal name never before used in Papal history, this new name will add a count of 1 to the count total. Then 665 + 1 = 666.

Or mathematically:

Papal Name Count Added Count Total
John Paul II 2 663 + 2 = 665
Benedict XVI 15 665 + 15 = 680
Subtract for removing Benedict XVI name -15 680 - 15 = 665
Add 1 for a new Papal name 1 665 + 1 = 666

---
And it's the 2nd beast of Revelation 13 that causes all to take the mark; not the antichrist, as prophecy movies portray.

Yeah, this pope is going to cause a lot of problems for Protestants.

damned.gif


Dude I didnt know you were a woman

13.gif


Well, Octo's avatar showed me the beauty of being a woman.
So, I thot I'd give it a try.
It really rocks!

beerbong.gif
03-14-2013, 01:49 AM #8
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(03-14-2013, 01:47 AM)Lisa Boxx Wrote:  
(03-14-2013, 01:39 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  The Oxyrhynchus Papyrus is the oldest known copy of the Book of Revelation. Close examination of this fragment indicates the mark of the beast is 616, not 666. If the mark is, cryptically, Hebrew letters, and not Greek, then the numeric value is 436.

http://heavenawaits.wordpress.com/616-not-666/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast

Not worried. coffeetime.gif


Yeah. 666 is the number of the name of the beast. My post probably sums it up right.

I worry about going with 616, cause I try to stay away from what they call "extra Biblical theology."

But I still love ya.

cheers.gif


nobody here is going to judge you or bash you because of your beliefs this is not LoP and hardtruth aint here.
03-14-2013, 01:52 AM #9
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,578 Threads:1,444 Joined:Feb 2011
I did present evidence. The council of Nicea, like the modern day church messed up everything. Revelation was an interpretation of the book Daniel. A far more reliable source.

wonder.gif
03-14-2013, 01:53 AM #10
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,367 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
(03-14-2013, 01:48 AM)Lisa Boxx Wrote:  Well, Octo's avatar showed me the beauty of being a woman.
So, I thot I'd give it a try.
It really rocks!

beerbong.gif


lmao.gif Good for you. cheers.gifhug.gif
03-14-2013, 01:59 AM #11
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(03-14-2013, 01:52 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  I did present evidence. The council of Nicea, like the modern day church messed up everything. Revelation was an interpretation of the book Daniel. A far more reliable source.


council of nicea did not deal with issues regarding which books were part of the NT its a myth. they dealt with rather or not jesus was god or a created being.
03-14-2013, 02:02 AM #12
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,578 Threads:1,444 Joined:Feb 2011
Linkies or stinkies? chuckle.gif

wonder.gif
03-14-2013, 02:20 AM #13
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(03-14-2013, 02:02 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Linkies or stinkies? chuckle.gif


i have had this debate many times usually it does not end well so i quit debating religion

http://carm.org/myths-about-the-council-of-nicea
03-14-2013, 02:29 AM #14
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,578 Threads:1,444 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif Not ending well is kinda' putting it mildly.
Just best to agree to disagree on some things, I normally would not have gone even this far but... beerbong.gif My birthday n' shït. chuckle.gif

wonder.gif
03-14-2013, 02:31 AM #15
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,367 Threads:1,483 Joined:Feb 2011
(03-14-2013, 02:20 AM)I⊥∀NIW∩LLIʞ Wrote:  
(03-14-2013, 02:02 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Linkies or stinkies? chuckle.gif


i have had this debate many times usually it does not end well so i quit debating religion

http://carm.org/myths-about-the-council-of-nicea


Oh man don't I know it. Used to have this discussion with my brother all the time about God, Life, Love and Everything. He seemed to have had a lightbulb moment, but then he went on to go from being a paramedic and fireman to a minister. blink.gif I love him and all, but Jesus Christ. lmao.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com