#Login Register

  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average

Another short message from our POTUS
09-04-2013, 03:10 AM #1
Stoppitt Kruger Ally
Posts:64 Threads:13 Joined:Jul 2012
09-04-2013, 03:16 AM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
rofl.gif I've been saying the same thing for a few days now. Talk about logic fail. It's epic.


09-04-2013, 03:21 AM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:40,976 Threads:1,566 Joined:Feb 2011
Yes but it will be a limited action so it's really just a message folks, not really a war or anything. It's like an aggressive email.

09-04-2013, 03:28 AM #4
yankees skier
Posts:5,032 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
I think even Sarah Palin said that last week. rofl.gif

09-04-2013, 03:33 AM #5
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,185 Threads:1,485 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif Talk about upping the credibility.


09-04-2013, 03:35 AM #6
yankees skier
Posts:5,032 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
09-04-2013, 03:41 AM #7
Stoppitt Kruger Ally
Posts:64 Threads:13 Joined:Jul 2012
Thanks for the comments you guys. The more I see what is going on with this whole situation, the more I am sickened by what our grubbermint truly represents. Nothing more than a bunch of psychotic sociopathic killers on a good payroll. Seems like it is time for us to take our country back before these assholes destroy what is left of our still great country.

We would get better leaders if they were hand picked at the local sanitarium, imo.

Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
09-04-2013, 08:59 AM #8
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
If Obama goes in and does strikes limited to chemical manufacture and storage I think that is a good thing regardless of who was responsible for this.

With our lvl of stealth we should be able to accomplish this without even having to take out defensive positions or be contested in the air.

...and don't think we don't have more advanced capability built into stealth drones already.

If they have not already seen use it is because they do not want to risk losing one as it would be worse then... lets say handing the tail section of a secret stealth chopper to the enemy? but now maybe their confidence is higher? maybe they have a reliable system of destroying one automaticallically now if something goes wrong?
09-04-2013, 09:51 AM #9
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,580 Threads:79 Joined:Feb 2011
What difference is there, between the old Komintern version and the PNAC one?



Syria for the Syrians!
Let them sort it themselves.
And that goes for the foreign jihadidiots too.



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com