#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


BREAKING...Buh bye Susan Rice as Secretary of State
11-30-2012, 03:27 AM #1
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,272 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:U.N. ambassador has investments in companies doing business with Iran, disclosure forms show



The portfolio of embattled United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice includes investments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in several energy companies known for doing business with Iran, according to financial disclosure forms.

Rice, a possible nominee to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when she steps down, has come under criticism for promulgating erroneous information about the September 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans.

Rice has the highest net worth of executive branch members, with a fortune estimated between $24 to $44 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. A Free Beacon analysis of Rice’s portfolio shows thousands of dollars invested in at least three separate companies cited by lawmakers on Capitol Hill for doing business in Iran’s oil and gas sector.
Read more: http://freebeacon.com/susan-rices-enrichment-program/

In the interest of the admin practicing what they preach, does this disqualify her? bored.gif

wonder.gif
11-30-2012, 03:30 AM #2
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
I wonder how many Congressmen have mutual funds that have holdings with companies that do business there as well?coffeetime.gif


Biere.
11-30-2012, 03:33 AM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,272 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
uhhuh.gif Yup, that would be interesting to know. Of course we don't need such information. coffeetime.gif

wonder.gif
11-30-2012, 03:37 AM #4
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
You'd think 13.gif pretty stupid of her ... or deliberate.
11-30-2012, 03:39 AM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,587 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
She was shot down apparently. coffeetime.gif
11-30-2012, 03:47 AM #6
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
You'd think if she wanted to be S of S that she'd get rid of those investments dunno.gif
11-30-2012, 03:51 AM #7
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,272 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Apparently she didn't want the gig. coffeetime.gif

wonder.gif
11-30-2012, 04:05 AM #8
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-30-2012, 03:51 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Apparently she didn't want the gig. coffeetime.gif


Yeah maybe. Just seems odd that if she aspires to a post like that that she'd let something so incriminating be in her portfolio. Hillarity doesn't want it either, anymore.
11-30-2012, 04:10 AM #9
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,272 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Who'd want a job being thrown under a bus when things go awry? coffeetime.gif

wonder.gif
11-30-2012, 04:14 AM #10
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Ask Colin Powell chuckle.gif
11-30-2012, 04:29 AM #11
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,587 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif
11-30-2012, 04:29 AM #12
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,272 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Yeah, I'm sure his um... Colin still hurts. chuckle.gif

wonder.gif
11-30-2012, 05:40 AM #13
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(11-30-2012, 03:27 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  
Quote:U.N. ambassador has investments in companies doing business with Iran, disclosure forms show



The portfolio of embattled United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice includes investments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in several energy companies known for doing business with Iran, according to financial disclosure forms.

Rice, a possible nominee to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when she steps down, has come under criticism for promulgating erroneous information about the September 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans.

Rice has the highest net worth of executive branch members, with a fortune estimated between $24 to $44 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. A Free Beacon analysis of Rice’s portfolio shows thousands of dollars invested in at least three separate companies cited by lawmakers on Capitol Hill for doing business in Iran’s oil and gas sector.
Read more: http://freebeacon.com/susan-rices-enrichment-program/

In the interest of the admin practicing what they preach, does this disqualify her? bored.gif


No - liberals are completely immoral and hypocritical about issues like this. They will defend her until it becomes absolutely untenable - Clinton held on even beyond that point, "what do you mean by the word 'is'?"

The current liberal meme, believe it or not is: "The hypocrisy of Republicans' attack on Susan Rice". Attacking someone for hypocrisy who is attacking you for hypocrisy is hypocritical.

Liberals are 30% less honest than conservatives so they can only attack when condemned for moral or ethical failings because they are immoral and unethical.
11-30-2012, 05:43 AM #14
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,881 Threads:420 Joined:Jun 2012
(11-30-2012, 05:40 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  
(11-30-2012, 03:27 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  
Quote:U.N. ambassador has investments in companies doing business with Iran, disclosure forms show



The portfolio of embattled United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice includes investments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in several energy companies known for doing business with Iran, according to financial disclosure forms.

Rice, a possible nominee to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when she steps down, has come under criticism for promulgating erroneous information about the September 11, 2012, attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans.

Rice has the highest net worth of executive branch members, with a fortune estimated between $24 to $44 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. A Free Beacon analysis of Rice’s portfolio shows thousands of dollars invested in at least three separate companies cited by lawmakers on Capitol Hill for doing business in Iran’s oil and gas sector.
Read more: http://freebeacon.com/susan-rices-enrichment-program/

In the interest of the admin practicing what they preach, does this disqualify her? bored.gif


No - liberals are completely immoral and hypocritical about issues like this. They will defend her until it becomes absolutely untenable - Clinton held on even beyond that point, "what do you mean by the word 'is'?"

The current liberal meme, believe it or not is: "The hypocrisy of Republicans' attack on Susan Rice". Attacking someone for hypocrisy who is attacking you for hypocrisy is hypocritical.

Liberals are 30% less honest than conservatives so they can only attack when condemned for moral or ethical failings because they are immoral and unethical.


There seems to be a new political strategy in how to take 'em down.
11-30-2012, 09:29 AM #15
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
Having blasted her defenders ...

I'm not actually sure she has done anything wrong. All her investments should have gone into a blind trust and any prejudicial holdings liquidated with no capital gains tax.

If that isn't what happened it would be a little curious and might be worth a look.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com