#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


BREAKING! Egypt Headed for Civil War? Morsi Leaves Palace as Supporters Vow Jihad!
12-06-2012, 04:22 AM #16
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
(12-06-2012, 04:16 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  PS. Assad is threatening use the Sarin gas that "cough" "cough" Iraq didn't have.spank.gif


Source?
12-06-2012, 04:31 AM #17
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:During the lead-up to war in March 2003, United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix had found no stockpiles of WMD and had made significant progress toward resolving open issues of disarmament noting "proactive" but not always the "immediate" Iraqi cooperation as called for by UN Security Council Resolution 1441. He concluded that it would take “but months” to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks.[4] The United States asserted this was a breach of Resolution 1441 but failed to convince the UN Security Council to pass a new resolution authorizing the use of force due to lack of evidence.[5][6][7] Despite being unable to get a new resolution authorizing force and citing section 3 of the Joint Resolution passed by the U.S. Congress,[8] President George W. Bush asserted peaceful measures could not disarm Iraq of the weapons he alleged it to have and launched a second Gulf War,[9] despite multiple dissenting opinions[10] and questions of integrity[11][12][13] about the underlying intelligence.[14] Later U.S.-led inspections agreed that Iraq had earlier abandoned its WMD programs, but asserted Iraq had an intention to pursue those programs if UN sanctions were ever lifted.[15] Bush later said that the biggest regret of his presidency was "the intelligence failure" in Iraq,[16] while the Senate Intelligence Committee found in 2008 that his administration "misrepresented the intelligence and the threat from Iraq".[17] A key CIA informant in Iraq admitted that he lied about his allegations, "then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_we...estruction

Do you get it yet? You've been lied to. Over and over and after 11 years of attacking unoffending disarmed countries at multi trillions in cost and zero benefit to anybody but the banks and the MIC you still believe the lies. sad2.gif

Ask yourself Cui bono. Americans? Iraqis? Libyans? Banks and the MIC?

















12-06-2012, 04:34 AM #18
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
From the same wiki page

Quote:On June 21, 2006 the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released key points from a classified report from the National Ground Intelligence Center on the recovery of a small number of degraded chemical munitions in Iraq. The report stated that "Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent." However, all are thought to be pre-Gulf War munitions.[115]

These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons of mass destruction, according to the commander of the National Ground Intelligence Center. "These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee. The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the 1980s, Maples said. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as originally intended, though agent remaining in the weapons would be very valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said.[116]

In the 1980s Saddam was the US's golden boy and they backed his attack on Iran. So where did Saddam get those WMD? lol.gif








12-06-2012, 04:36 AM #19
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,618 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(12-05-2012, 03:49 AM)yankees Wrote:  
(12-05-2012, 02:57 AM)Shadow Wrote:  
(12-05-2012, 02:37 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  I'll bite - who is causing the problem?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KvzuDbG-TQ


Awesome find.


This is a movie you'll enjoy. beercheer.gif

(The movie where Shadow's clip came from)

12-06-2012, 05:12 AM #20
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(12-06-2012, 04:22 AM)Shadow Wrote:  
(12-06-2012, 04:16 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  PS. Assad is threatening use the Sarin gas that "cough" "cough" Iraq didn't have.spank.gif


Source?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/05...48115.html


I looked for the most liberal site I could find with the information.
12-06-2012, 06:31 AM #21
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,618 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(12-06-2012, 05:12 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  
(12-06-2012, 04:22 AM)Shadow Wrote:  
(12-06-2012, 04:16 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  PS. Assad is threatening use the Sarin gas that "cough" "cough" Iraq didn't have.spank.gif


Source?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/05...48115.html


I looked for the most liberal site I could find with the information.


lmao.gif t-dancing.gif

I don't often lay back and watch threads take off by themselves...

But when I do, I eat melted organic butter soaked Bonnie Lee popcorn wearing Liberal Red lipstick crying my eyes out causing my mascara to run like a goddamn French drama!

popcorn2.gif
12-06-2012, 06:51 AM #22
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
(12-06-2012, 04:16 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  Time for us to start cluster bombing the hell out of people who annoy us (high tech IEDs).


If Beijing dropped willy pete on Philly, how annoyed should the Chinese be if it wasn't welcomed by Americans?

12-06-2012, 07:01 AM #23
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,618 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Don't worry Shadow, they will be greeted as liberators and have rose petals thrown at them just as they have been welcome overseas. İmage
12-06-2012, 07:16 AM #24
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
hug.gif it always floors me how some can deny the obvious.

Did Iraq attack the US?
No.
Did Iraq threaten to?
No.
Did the US attack Iraq?
Yes.

How hard can it be to understand? dunno.gif
12-06-2012, 08:05 AM #25
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,618 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com