#Login Register


  • 8 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
Home 


BUSTED! Moon Rock Given to Holland by Neil Armstrong IFAKE!)
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
02-18-2014, 11:19 PM #1
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 




damned.gif
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
02-18-2014, 11:20 PM #2
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 
02-18-2014, 11:41 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,616 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
That's not very nice. 13.gif
02-18-2014, 11:57 PM #4
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
Wrong that was from 2009........since then.......

The museum acknowledged that though they did vet the moon rock they failed to double check it. The museum was under the incorrect belief that this moon rock was one of the 135 Apollo 11 moon rocks that were presented to the nations of the world by the Nixon Administration. "It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," said Frank Beunk, a geologist involved in the investigation. The genuine Apollo 11 moon rock given to the Dutch is in the inventory of a different museum in the Netherlands, which is, in fact, one of the very few countries where the location of both the Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 gift rocks is known.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_an...roven_fake

.......you should email the person that posted that on YouTube because they obviously are not vetting their info
Lisa Boxx Show this Post
02-19-2014, 12:10 AM #5
Lisa Boxx Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-18-2014, 11:57 PM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  Wrong that was from 2009........since then.......

The museum acknowledged that though they did vet the moon rock they failed to double check it. The museum was under the incorrect belief that this moon rock was one of the 135 Apollo 11 moon rocks that were presented to the nations of the world by the Nixon Administration. "It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," said Frank Beunk, a geologist involved in the investigation. The genuine Apollo 11 moon rock given to the Dutch is in the inventory of a different museum in the Netherlands, which is, in fact, one of the very few countries where the location of both the Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 gift rocks is known.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_an...roven_fake

.......you should email the person that posted that on YouTube because they obviously are not vetting their info

Ok. But you used CIA controlled Wikipedia as your source.
02-19-2014, 01:24 AM #6
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
Hi Lisa Boxx,

Usually anything on Wiki can be googled up elsewhere,,,

I'm not going to do that,,,because that rock is funny,,,

I have seen real moon rocks,,,well said to be real,,,and they

sure didn't look like that,,,seems a high school student would

question that thing,,,it looks a lot like petrified wood,,,it really does,,,

can't believe it made it this far...

(:X
02-19-2014, 01:44 AM #7
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
and speaking of fakes,,,did anyone see the fake tonight show???,,,

with Jimminey Faillon???,,,wow,,,it was the late night with

Jimminey Faillon,,,with the title changed,,,jokes were bad,,,

roots the band,,,little stage,,,little man,,,the tonight show no longer exist,,,

it went extinct,,,this is the end...

(:X
02-19-2014, 02:47 AM #8
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-19-2014, 12:10 AM)Lisa Boxx Wrote:  
(02-18-2014, 11:57 PM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  Wrong that was from 2009........since then.......

The museum acknowledged that though they did vet the moon rock they failed to double check it. The museum was under the incorrect belief that this moon rock was one of the 135 Apollo 11 moon rocks that were presented to the nations of the world by the Nixon Administration. "It's a nondescript, pretty-much-worthless stone," said Frank Beunk, a geologist involved in the investigation. The genuine Apollo 11 moon rock given to the Dutch is in the inventory of a different museum in the Netherlands, which is, in fact, one of the very few countries where the location of both the Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 gift rocks is known.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_an...roven_fake

.......you should email the person that posted that on YouTube because they obviously are not vetting their info

Ok. But you used CIA controlled Wikipedia as your source.

They have footnotes you know those lil blue numbers all over the wiki pages........that rock is fake yes but its not the rock from the Apollo 17 mission cuz that rock is at another museum

FYI the CIA controls everything so dont trust anything except your own eyes and even those can be tricked 13.gif

Also take a screenshot when you see something important cuz sometimes articles seem to disappear kinda like posts at gLoP 13.gif
02-19-2014, 03:32 AM #9
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-19-2014, 02:47 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  They have footnotes you know those lil blue numbers all over the wiki pages........that rock is fake yes but its not the rock from the Apollo 17 mission cuz that rock is at another museum

FYI the CIA controls everything so dont trust anything except your own eyes and even those can be tricked 13.gif

Also take a screenshot when you see something important cuz sometimes articles seem to disappear kinda like posts at gLoP 13.gif

yeah,,,I guess they didn't have a moon rock,,,so just went out back,,,

and got one,,,could have gotten a better moon rock,,,

I mean that moon rock isn't a very good moon rock at all,,,

kind of a lousy moon rock,,,a poser moon rock,,,really lousy

moon rock,,,not even a funny moon rock,,,could have at least

gotten a funny moon rock,,,gee,,,everything is a fraud nowadays...

(:X
02-19-2014, 04:26 AM #10
Wicked Oblivion Member
Posts:10,778 Threads:720 Joined:Oct 2012
Even i would be easily able to find some unusually shaped ordinary earth rocks and then spray paint them various shades of silver and gold and chrome and then try passing them off as genuine moon rocks while displaying them within elaborate lighted glass cases where everyone can look and no one can touch and examine but as long as the majority of sheeple believe that nasa moon rocks are actually from the moon its deceptive psychops business as usual...

İmage
02-19-2014, 08:00 AM #11
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
Hi Beyond,

Yeah,,,they went out back,,,and got a rock from under a piece of dog poop,,,

brought it in,,,sat it on the desk,,,and put a "MOON ROCK" label on it,,,

but it is not a moon rock,,,and many can see that,,,but the ones selling it,,,

tell the story,,,greatest moon rock ever,,,but some can see right through all

the bull,,,and know this isn't a real moon rock,,,not even close,,,it is the suck

moon rock,,,which sucks more than any moon rock ever before,,,it sucks so

bad that it is a joke,,,in fact it is the joke,,,joke on everyone that this is a

real moon rock,,,it is the suck moon rock,,,it sucketh more suck than any

suck has ever sucketh so great is its suck beyond all suck that ever suckethed

before is its suck...

(:X
02-19-2014, 08:26 AM #12
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-19-2014, 03:32 AM)Softy Wrote:  
(02-19-2014, 02:47 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  They have footnotes you know those lil blue numbers all over the wiki pages........that rock is fake yes but its not the rock from the Apollo 17 mission cuz that rock is at another museum

FYI the CIA controls everything so dont trust anything except your own eyes and even those can be tricked 13.gif

Also take a screenshot when you see something important cuz sometimes articles seem to disappear kinda like posts at gLoP 13.gif

yeah,,,I guess they didn't have a moon rock,,,so just went out back,,,

and got one,,,could have gotten a better moon rock,,,

I mean that moon rock isn't a very good moon rock at all,,,

kind of a lousy moon rock,,,a poser moon rock,,,really lousy

moon rock,,,not even a funny moon rock,,,could have at least

gotten a funny moon rock,,,gee,,,everything is a fraud nowadays...

(:X

The article tells how thousands of people viewed it yet nobody said a thing..........maybe only dumb dumbz go to museums chuckle.gif
02-19-2014, 08:36 AM #13
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-19-2014, 08:26 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  
(02-19-2014, 03:32 AM)Softy Wrote:  
(02-19-2014, 02:47 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  They have footnotes you know those lil blue numbers all over the wiki pages........that rock is fake yes but its not the rock from the Apollo 17 mission cuz that rock is at another museum

FYI the CIA controls everything so dont trust anything except your own eyes and even those can be tricked 13.gif

Also take a screenshot when you see something important cuz sometimes articles seem to disappear kinda like posts at gLoP 13.gif

yeah,,,I guess they didn't have a moon rock,,,so just went out back,,,

and got one,,,could have gotten a better moon rock,,,

I mean that moon rock isn't a very good moon rock at all,,,

kind of a lousy moon rock,,,a poser moon rock,,,really lousy

moon rock,,,not even a funny moon rock,,,could have at least

gotten a funny moon rock,,,gee,,,everything is a fraud nowadays...

(:X

The article tells how thousands of people viewed it yet nobody said a thing..........maybe only dumb dumbz go to museums chuckle.gif

Faillon is the moon rock,,,

gee whiz,,,have to spell everything out,,,

staying on topic,,,without being on topic...

(:X

Yeah,,,they went out back,,,and got a rock from under a piece of dog poop,,,

brought it in,,,sat it on the desk,,,and put a "MOON ROCK" label on it,,,

but it is not a moon rock,,,and many can see that,,,but the ones selling it,,,

tell the story,,,greatest moon rock ever,,,but some can see right through all

the bull,,,and know this isn't a real moon rock,,,not even close,,,it is the suck

moon rock,,,which sucks more than any moon rock ever before,,,it sucks so

bad that it is a joke,,,in fact it is the joke,,,joke on everyone that this is a

real moon rock,,,it is the suck moon rock,,,it sucketh more suck than any

suck has ever sucketh so great is its suck beyond all suck that ever suckethed

before is its suck...

(:X
02-19-2014, 11:12 AM #14
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,286 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Not a big Fallon fan personally. It's not even on until 6.30 am here, so thankfully we don't watch it.

wonder.gif
02-19-2014, 06:15 PM #15
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-19-2014, 11:12 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Not a big Fallon fan personally. It's not even on until 6.30 am here, so thankfully we don't watch it.

Figure thread is dead,,,so derailed,,,K has a thread on this,,,

I figured this was more fun,,,yeah,,,Fallon is OK on Saturday Night Live,,,

and on his own has some talent,,,his Late Night with Jimmey Fallon,,,

just was not my favorite,,,he makes faces and noises,,,and that is

supposed to be funny,,,too much of the show is this,,,and he is always

saying so and so is the greatest,,,over and over,,,till it just gets stale,,,

so now he has been given the Tonight Show and Jay Leno is out,,,

what they did was relabel the Late Night show with the label Tonight Show,,,

it is the same thing,,,it is in New York,,,and it,,,in my opinion is far inferior,,,

same small stage,,,same band Roots,,,crammed along one wall,,,no room

for guess band,,,so they stuck them on the roof of New York building,,,

it is really bad,,,you are missing nothing,,,nor am I as I am not watching it,,,

on the NBC news shows they are giving it RAVE reviews,,,it is not real,,,

it is bull,,,we will see if this last,,,Kimmels ratings will go up further,,,

and even Letterman,,,so I saw the first Tonight show with Fallon,,,

it was not the Tonight show,,,The Tonight Show is history,,,an era has

ended...

(:X



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com