#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Blood Sacrifice for Fame
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-10-2012, 11:49 PM #31
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-10-2012, 11:46 PM)Prometheus Wrote:  
(11-10-2012, 11:24 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  
(11-10-2012, 11:10 PM)JollyRoger Wrote:  
(11-10-2012, 11:02 PM)Octo Wrote:  Are you familiar with Monarch programming?


Project Monarch is a mind control project and it is pretty much hypnosis induced. They did the same thing to us during 9/11. That was a case of MASS hypnosis. EVERYONE was under hypnosis during that event. Over half the people are still under the spell, but some people are waking up and this is why they are so nervous. They didn't expect this to last this long. But things have delayed them. There will be another attack.

Hurricane Sandy was an attempt to do the same thing, except it wasn't horrific enough for it to set in.

It's not over yet. Keep watching.


My background is civil engineering, believe me; I knew demolition when I saw it. Didn't phase me at all, but I certainly saw how it lobotomized the general public. On an emotional level I was and am totally detached from any outside influences.
You can't fool all of the people all of the time.
A calculated risk on their part. In turn, I shït in their general direction. coffeetime.gif


You better not, I read you can be taken to court for such actions.chuckle.gif


That doesn't mean they will win.

chuckle.gif
11-10-2012, 11:55 PM #32
Upāsaka Member
Posts:1,383 Threads:252 Joined:Feb 2011
Well they won't once you've met your Straw -Man/Woman



Quote:Did you know your birth certificate is a bond traded on the stock market?

Beware of what lawyers call "legal" fiction. Today, many who have researched Admiralty laws are taking back our rights, as democracy allows us to be a free sovereign people. It's about learning how to stand up for the "living" instead of allowing corporations and governments to address us as legal fiction or as some are calling our straw-man. I have to admit this legal truth, caught me off guard! No I'm not a lawyer, so I had to do my homework and was surprised how most lawyers know nothing about this area of law. Not all lawyers study this area of law, nor do they know everything about law.

This creative makes fun of how we are "not" under the law, in the way "the governments" want us to think we are. Most of us need to learn the difference between the "real person" and the "corporate" identity, known as a legal fiction. This starts with our birth certificates and then leads us to our Social Security or Insurance numbers required for us to do "business" with corporate identities like a government. Once these legaleses are understood, we can turn the tables around on "our" government and "our" employees, who become "our" public servants, yet once again. Please don't take my word for these little-known legal terms and research a support group in your area to keep up with the latest developments.

I will say this, "It appears that we all need to know more about the meaning of Social Security or as they call it in Canada, Social Insurance". Just ask Google about "Admiralty law" freeman.
11-10-2012, 11:57 PM #33
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,283 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
I'll take my chances. As you know, I'm well connected back in the old country. chuckle.gif

wonder.gif
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-10-2012, 11:58 PM #34
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-10-2012, 11:55 PM)Prometheus Wrote:  Well they won't once you've met your Straw -Man/Woman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH8TOktZJNU

Quote:Did you know your birth certificate is a bond traded on the stock market?

Beware of what lawyers call "legal" fiction. Today, many who have researched Admiralty laws are taking back our rights, as democracy allows us to be a free sovereign people. It's about learning how to stand up for the "living" instead of allowing corporations and governments to address us as legal fiction or as some are calling our straw-man. I have to admit this legal truth, caught me off guard! No I'm not a lawyer, so I had to do my homework and was surprised how most lawyers know nothing about this area of law. Not all lawyers study this area of law, nor do they know everything about law.

This creative makes fun of how we are "not" under the law, in the way "the governments" want us to think we are. Most of us need to learn the difference between the "real person" and the "corporate" identity, known as a legal fiction. This starts with our birth certificates and then leads us to our Social Security or Insurance numbers required for us to do "business" with corporate identities like a government. Once these legaleses are understood, we can turn the tables around on "our" government and "our" employees, who become "our" public servants, yet once again. Please don't take my word for these little-known legal terms and research a support group in your area to keep up with the latest developments.

I will say this, "It appears that we all need to know more about the meaning of Social Security or as they call it in Canada, Social Insurance". Just ask Google about "Admiralty law" freeman.


Oh, I've met him. =) Under my signature on my driver's license it says "All Rights Reserved". That now becomes my legal signature by law.
11-11-2012, 12:02 AM #35
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
So do you think its possible to induce a hypnotic state remotely?
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-11-2012, 12:07 AM #36
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-11-2012, 12:02 AM)Octo Wrote:  So do you think its possible to induce a hypnotic state remotely?


How do you mean? 9/11 was remote for many people watching on TV. I could hypnotize you by telephone or simply send you a picture by mail. There are many forms of remote. If you mean "Curse" someone using visualization and emotion, then, yes. That is also possible, but that goes more in to esoteric knowledge, rather than psychological.

Everything in hypnosis is done by consent. 9/11 was consent because you chose to watch.
11-11-2012, 12:13 AM #37
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
No I meant without TV,email or any external application running at the time.
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-11-2012, 12:19 AM #38
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-11-2012, 12:13 AM)Octo Wrote:  No I meant without TV,email or any external application running at the time.


No. The idea must be conveyed by stimulus and a guide. You can be influenced by power of suggestion and it has the same affect as an induction. I can say certain words and put you under without you even knowing what was happening. That is called Neuro-Linguistic Programming. But that is not as invasive as induction but does the same thing.

Some call it word magic. ; ) Or "Power Words", as sales people and businessmen call it.
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-11-2012, 12:22 AM #39
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
If I say to you, the word, "Lemon". Do you see it, taste it or both?
11-11-2012, 12:29 AM #40
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-11-2012, 12:19 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  
(11-11-2012, 12:13 AM)Octo Wrote:  No I meant without TV,email or any external application running at the time.


No. The idea must be conveyed by stimulus and a guide. You can be influenced by power of suggestion and it has the same affect as an induction. I can say certain words and put you under without you even knowing what was happening. That is called Neuro-Linguistic Programming. But that is not as invasive as induction but does the same thing.

Some call it word magic. ; ) Or "Power Words", as sales people and businessmen call it.


I'm familiar with Neuro-Linguistic programming. I guess some people are more open to programming that others.

Who, in your opinion, would you say is open to programming?
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-11-2012, 12:35 AM #41
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-11-2012, 12:29 AM)Octo Wrote:  
(11-11-2012, 12:19 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  
(11-11-2012, 12:13 AM)Octo Wrote:  No I meant without TV,email or any external application running at the time.


No. The idea must be conveyed by stimulus and a guide. You can be influenced by power of suggestion and it has the same affect as an induction. I can say certain words and put you under without you even knowing what was happening. That is called Neuro-Linguistic Programming. But that is not as invasive as induction but does the same thing.

Some call it word magic. ; ) Or "Power Words", as sales people and businessmen call it.


I'm familiar with Neuro-Linguistic programming. I guess some people are more open to programming that others.

Who, in your opinion, would you say is open to programming?


Everyone.

It's not the person, it's the technique.

There are 3 types of suggestabilities in personalities

1. The Physical Suggestive. (Takes suggestion directly and literally)

2. The Emotional Suggestive. (Takes suggestion indirectly and inferred)

3. The somnambulist. (Takes ANY suggestion (These are usually the ones chosen as subjects at hypnotist shows) also sleep walks and/or talks in their sleep.)

ALL people can be hypnotized whether they think they can be or not.

You are under hypnosis twice a day, minimum, and you don't even realize it.

1. Once before you wake up (Hynopompic Reverie)
.
2. Once before you fall asleep. (Hypnogogic Reverie)


If I know what your suggestibility is, then I have you. I just change the technique.

ALL people are susceptible to a shock induction
11-11-2012, 09:51 AM #42
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
Don't believe everyone is suggestible.

One of my fraternity brothers used to practice hypnotizing people (he was a psych major). I was the only one he had problems with. If you get me relaxed enough to be suggestible I fall asleep. One guy who did meditation was putty in his hands.
JollyRoger Show this Post
11-11-2012, 10:31 AM #43
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(11-11-2012, 09:51 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  Don't believe everyone is suggestible.

One of my fraternity brothers used to practice hypnotizing people (he was a psych major). I was the only one he had problems with. If you get me relaxed enough to be suggestible I fall asleep. One guy who did meditation was putty in his hands.


Yeah, the problem is, Psyche majors only touch on it. They don't go in depth. That's specialized training. There were Doctors and Psychotherapists learning the same class I learned.

Yes, you can be hypnotized. You are an emotional suggestive. I can tell by talking to you. You like to resist in order to disprove something. well.... All I have to do is infer suggestions to you. I just take you along on my choo choo train of thought. If you think I can't, I already have by keeping your interest.

It's kinda like mental Aikido. I pull one way, you resist, I let you go that way or I redirect your energy (attention) and your momentum carries you in.
11-11-2012, 11:37 AM #44
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(11-11-2012, 10:31 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  
(11-11-2012, 09:51 AM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  Don't believe everyone is suggestible.

One of my fraternity brothers used to practice hypnotizing people (he was a psych major). I was the only one he had problems with. If you get me relaxed enough to be suggestible I fall asleep. One guy who did meditation was putty in his hands.


Yeah, the problem is, Psyche majors only touch on it. They don't go in depth. That's specialized training. There were Doctors and Psychotherapists learning the same class I learned.

Yes, you can be hypnotized. You are an emotional suggestive. I can tell by talking to you. You like to resist in order to disprove something. well.... All I have to do is infer suggestions to you. I just take you along on my choo choo train of thought. If you think I can't, I already have by keeping your interest.

It's kinda like mental Aikido. I pull one way, you resist, I let you go that way or I redirect your energy (attention) and your momentum carries you in.


Well, you might be on to something. I took tae kwon do for a year or two so I'm not into the push pull thing, I'm more the frontal assault type.

Sadly we'll probably never be able to resolve the issue.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com