#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


Boat Owners Call BP's Cleanup Program a Corrupt Conspiracy
08-10-2011, 09:01 PM #1
Upāsaka Member
Posts:1,383 Threads:252 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:Mobile, Alabama - Nearly 100 Gulf Coast boat owners who let BP hire their ships for its "Vessels of Opportunity" oil spill cleanup say BP's program was a corrupt conspiracy that left "thousands of participants ... holding the bag for millions of dollars of unpaid services, equipment, materials, repairs and decontaminations" - and that BP intended it that way.

The 94 individual plaintiffs say BP touted its Vessels of Opportunity (VoO) program for public relations purposes, but the program "was marred by mismanagement, corruption and broken promises," and that BP and its co-conspirators "intended to underpay VoO participants."

Lead plaintiff Clyde Crawford says BP promised the plaintiffs $1,200 to $3,000 a day to use their boats during the cleanup.

Crawford says the plaintiffs signed contracts promising to be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and that BP told them told several times that they would be paid their daily rate even on days they were not called to work.

BP promised to pay for all repairs needed as the result of the work, and to pay for decontaminating the boats when their work was done, according to the 111-page complaint.

But the fishermen say the whole Vessels of Opportunity program was a corrupt conspiracy.

"[Defendants] BP, Parsons Corporation, Danos & Curole, HEPACO, U.S. Environmental Services and the individual defendants have engaged in an illegal and unlawful conspiracy to defraud plaintiffs and underpay plaintiffs for services, equipment, materials, repairs and decontaminations related to the VoO program and the oil spill response," the complaint states.

"Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP established the VoO program as part of BP's response to the oil spill. Publicly, BP claimed that the VoO program would help clean up the Gulf Coast and would provide money to people affected by the oil spill. Once implemented, the VoO program was marred by mismanagement, corruption and broken promises. As a result, when the VoO program concluded, thousands of participants, including plaintiffs, were left holding the bag for millions of dollars of unpaid services, equipment, materials, repairs and decontaminations."

The fishermen say that "to implement the VoO program, BP and the other defendants needed to mobilize thousands of vessels, captains and crew members in a very short period of time. However, many of the vessels, captains and crew members that needed to be mobilized, although idled by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, were entitled under applicable law to be reimbursed by BP for all of their lost income resulting from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. As a result, in order to effectively implement the VoO program, BP and the other defendants had to convince vessel owners, captains and crew members that they would receive more money through the VoO program than if they sat idle at the dock or pursued other employment or income opportunities."

Throughout its campaign to get vessel owners to sign on to the VoO program, BP and the other defendants "represented, promised and warranted, among other things, that (a) VoO participants would be paid for standby time; (b) VoO participants would be fairly reimbursed for damage to their vessels that occurred while the vessels were in the VoO program; © VoO participants would be reimbursed for costs and expenses incurred as a result of the VoO program; (d) VoO participants' vessel would be decontaminated at BP's expense at the conclusion of the VoO program; and (e) the income that VoO participants receive through the VoO program would not offset the claims that VoO participants had against BP as a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

BP knew these representations were false when they were made. Further, these false representations were part of and in furtherance of BP and the other defendants' unlawful and illegal conspiracy to defraud plaintiffs and to underpay plaintiffs for services, equipment, materials, repairs and decontaminations related to plaintiffs' participation in the VoO program," according to the complaint....http://www.sott.net/articles/show/233287...Conspiracy


More of the same from BP -bunch of cretins, who always screw over people.
08-10-2011, 11:51 PM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,265 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:But the fishermen say the whole Vessels of Opportunity program was a corrupt conspiracy.

Conspiracy theorist boat owners added to the the DHS Terrorist watch list agent_smith.gif

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-11-2011, 12:12 AM #3
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(08-10-2011, 11:51 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  
Quote:But the fishermen say the whole Vessels of Opportunity program was a corrupt conspiracy.

Conspiracy theorist boat owners added to the the DHS Terrorist watch list agent_smith.gif

par for the course 13.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com