#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


CHAOS AT KAVANAUGH LIVE
09-04-2018, 11:15 PM #16
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(09-04-2018, 11:12 PM)Team Uzi nli Wrote:  
(09-04-2018, 10:19 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(09-04-2018, 09:54 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(09-04-2018, 08:52 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I am listening to Sen. Ben Sasse, Nebraska and he has the inside scoop what's wrong with the U.S. government...very impressive.

Sasse is a #nevertrump-er.
He's an idiot that should be deported to Canada along with Ted Cruz.

He's got it right about how the U.S. government does not work and how they want the Justice to handle all the hard political work so they don't have to make the hard decisions that might lose them their jobs. He's right and you can't argue that fact. Also there are many nevertrump-ers and they are those that are his close aides, some that call Trump having the knowledge of a fifth/fixth grader. These are what the people who work with Trump every day are saying. But Sasse was speaking of legislative bodies, lobbyists and Congress not doing their jobs...wanting to pass the buck to the Justice to do the politics, so basically leaving the interpretation of bill of rights and constitution to personal interpretation then applying it into law. And it appears this Justice would be likely to overturn Roe vs Wade and this would oppress women...that's why you hear women yelling in the background during this hearing.

Still listening and some consider this a perverse process and want to wait.

Baby killers yelling in the background.
Sounds like a real party.

İmage

It's really none of your or my business if they want to abort their unwanted feti and the law, as it stands, allows for them to have that right to control their own bodies.
TEᗩᗰ ᑌᘔI ᑎᒪI Show this Post
09-04-2018, 11:24 PM #17
TEᗩᗰ ᑌᘔI ᑎᒪI Incognito Anonymous
 
AMERICAN politics is really none of your business Mohammad.
09-04-2018, 11:29 PM #18
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(09-04-2018, 11:24 PM)TEᗩᗰ ᑌᘔI ᑎᒪI Wrote:  AMERICAN politics is really none of your business Mohammad.

With your stance and amount of knowledge on the subject it should be none of your business either.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
09-04-2018, 11:54 PM #19
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
İmage
09-05-2018, 12:04 AM #20
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
Haters gonna hate and it goes with the territory here. I am not bothered in the least.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
09-05-2018, 12:36 AM #21
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
That's Great!

Just stay on your side of the border.
Sharia law will suit you people well.

Besides, we fought a revolution to keep foreigners like you out of the United States.
MAGA.
09-05-2018, 12:48 AM #22
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
It's like a car crash, it's difficult to avert one's attention.
09-05-2018, 02:05 AM #23
Team Uzi ռօ ǟʀȶɨʄɨƈɨǟʟ ֆաɛɛȶɛռɛʀֆ
Posts:1,968 Threads:83 Joined:Jul 2017
Kavanaugh is the perfect choice for the Supreme court.
His record is flawless.
Stupid Libtards will complain but it's too late.
Had Hillbillary been elected, we would have had to liberal judges in the court and the battle would have been lost.
The new conservative leadership will be in place for many years to come.
Politicians who are #nevertrump are losing their constituents left and right but those who support this President are winning en masse.
The tide has turned and the enemies of America are being flushed away like the garbage that they are.
İmage

ᎳhᎬᏁ Ꭺ ᎶuᏁ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ fᎪᎥᏞs, Ꭺ ᏒᎪᏢᎬ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ ᏢᏒᎬᏉᎪᎥᏞs
09-05-2018, 12:43 PM #24
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
His record is being withheld from view, so there is no way of officially  knowing his past record, except for what is reported in the news. As usual, you got it wrong.

But here a few tidbits.

Quote:“Kavanaugh is an ideologically driven pick designed to create an activist Supreme Court that will undermine rights and protections for women, LGBTQ people, immigrants and all vulnerable people,” GLAAD president and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis wrote in a statement. “Americans do not want or need 40 more years of Trump’s values.”

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/supreme-...ive-rights

http://bangordailynews.com/2018/09/01/na...e-records/

Let's make America like the 1950's again except this time everyone should be able to have an assault weapon, unaffordable care and sitting presidents should be above the law. But, when this guy is questioned today he won't admit to any of his true core values. It will be the usual BS, 'tell 'em what they want to hear'.

So, as I predicted he is saying what everyone wants to hear. However, he may follow precedent re: roe vs wade but in the end he feels he can decide what is or is not 'undue hardship or burden' on a woman.

Quote:This is what Kavanaugh himself did during his 2006 confirmation hearings to the D.C. Circuit Court: When Sen. Chuck Schumer asked his opinion on Roe, Kavanaugh dodged, responding that he would “follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully” because the case is “binding precedent of the Court,” but refusing to share his own view. While Supreme Court decisions are indeed binding on lower courts, the Supreme Court can overturn itself, and Kavanaugh has shown that he’s not sympathetic to abortion rights. Kavanaugh has applauded the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s view that “unenumerated rights could be recognized by the courts only if the asserted right was rooted in the nation’s history and tradition,” — in other words, that rights which are not specifically granted by the Constitution must at least have been traditionally accorded to the American people. He believes Supreme Court precedent already conflicts with itself on this issue – a perfect opening for overturning Roe. And he also heard an important abortion case when he was on the D.C. Circuit Court, and held that the government was not imposing an “undue burden” on an undocumented teenager by not letting her terminate her pregnancy in a timely manner. (That decision was overturned, and Kavanaugh vigorously dissented).

http://time.com/5336630/kavanaugh-roe-v-wade/
09-05-2018, 09:15 PM #25
Team Uzi ռօ ǟʀȶɨʄɨƈɨǟʟ ֆաɛɛȶɛռɛʀֆ
Posts:1,968 Threads:83 Joined:Jul 2017
(09-05-2018, 12:43 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  His record is being withheld from view, so there is no way of officially  knowing his past record, except for what is reported in the news. As usual, you got it wrong.

But here a few tidbits.

Quote:“Kavanaugh is an ideologically driven pick designed to create an activist Supreme Court that will undermine rights and protections for women, LGBTQ people, immigrants and all vulnerable people,” GLAAD president and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis wrote in a statement. “Americans do not want or need 40 more years of Trump’s values.”

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/supreme-...ive-rights

http://bangordailynews.com/2018/09/01/na...e-records/

Let's make America like the 1950's again except this time everyone should be able to have an assault weapon, unaffordable care and sitting presidents should be above the law. But, when this guy is questioned today he won't admit to any of his true core values. It will be the usual BS, 'tell 'em what they want to hear'.

So, as I predicted he is saying what everyone wants to hear. However, he may follow precedent re: roe vs wade but in the end he feels he can decide what is or is not 'undue hardship or burden' on a woman.

Quote:This is what Kavanaugh himself did during his 2006 confirmation hearings to the D.C. Circuit Court: When Sen. Chuck Schumer asked his opinion on Roe, Kavanaugh dodged, responding that he would “follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully” because the case is “binding precedent of the Court,” but refusing to share his own view. While Supreme Court decisions are indeed binding on lower courts, the Supreme Court can overturn itself, and Kavanaugh has shown that he’s not sympathetic to abortion rights. Kavanaugh has applauded the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s view that “unenumerated rights could be recognized by the courts only if the asserted right was rooted in the nation’s history and tradition,” — in other words, that rights which are not specifically granted by the Constitution must at least have been traditionally accorded to the American people. He believes Supreme Court precedent already conflicts with itself on this issue – a perfect opening for overturning Roe. And he also heard an important abortion case when he was on the D.C. Circuit Court, and held that the government was not imposing an “undue burden” on an undocumented teenager by not letting her terminate her pregnancy in a timely manner. (That decision was overturned, and Kavanaugh vigorously dissented).

http://time.com/5336630/kavanaugh-roe-v-wade/

Omg
You are so thick.

You don't know anything about American politics.

Hell, the Libtards in the Senate don't even know legal protocols.

All they can do is piss and moan like the losers that they are.

ᎳhᎬᏁ Ꭺ ᎶuᏁ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ fᎪᎥᏞs, Ꭺ ᏒᎪᏢᎬ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ ᏢᏒᎬᏉᎪᎥᏞs
RLK nli Show this Post
09-05-2018, 10:35 PM #26
RLK nli Incognito Anonymous
 
The protestors have been removed from the hearings for the second day. From what I've read they were paid with bags of money, this is all a bad side show. There were 60 + people escorted out, disgraceful behavior.
09-06-2018, 12:02 AM #27
Gumby AKA Chtumby
Posts:1,734 Threads:235 Joined:Mar 2013
look at this

http://magaimg.net/img/63ah.png


Don’t waste your time online, invest it with steemit.com
09-06-2018, 02:32 AM #28
Team Uzi ռօ ǟʀȶɨʄɨƈɨǟʟ ֆաɛɛȶɛռɛʀֆ
Posts:1,968 Threads:83 Joined:Jul 2017
İmage

ᎳhᎬᏁ Ꭺ ᎶuᏁ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ fᎪᎥᏞs, Ꭺ ᏒᎪᏢᎬ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ ᏢᏒᎬᏉᎪᎥᏞs
09-06-2018, 02:33 AM #29
Team Uzi ռօ ǟʀȶɨʄɨƈɨǟʟ ֆաɛɛȶɛռɛʀֆ
Posts:1,968 Threads:83 Joined:Jul 2017
(09-06-2018, 12:02 AM)Gumby Wrote:  look at this

İmage
Fixed it for you : )

ᎳhᎬᏁ Ꭺ ᎶuᏁ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ fᎪᎥᏞs, Ꭺ ᏒᎪᏢᎬ ᏟuᏞᏆuᏒᎬ ᏢᏒᎬᏉᎪᎥᏞs
09-06-2018, 04:37 PM #30
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,004 Threads:444 Joined:Jun 2012
(09-05-2018, 09:15 PM)Team Uzi Wrote:  
(09-05-2018, 12:43 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  His record is being withheld from view, so there is no way of officially  knowing his past record, except for what is reported in the news. As usual, you got it wrong.

But here a few tidbits.

Quote:“Kavanaugh is an ideologically driven pick designed to create an activist Supreme Court that will undermine rights and protections for women, LGBTQ people, immigrants and all vulnerable people,” GLAAD president and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis wrote in a statement. “Americans do not want or need 40 more years of Trump’s values.”

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/supreme-...ive-rights

http://bangordailynews.com/2018/09/01/na...e-records/

Let's make America like the 1950's again except this time everyone should be able to have an assault weapon, unaffordable care and sitting presidents should be above the law. But, when this guy is questioned today he won't admit to any of his true core values. It will be the usual BS, 'tell 'em what they want to hear'.

So, as I predicted he is saying what everyone wants to hear. However, he may follow precedent re: roe vs wade but in the end he feels he can decide what is or is not 'undue hardship or burden' on a woman.

Quote:This is what Kavanaugh himself did during his 2006 confirmation hearings to the D.C. Circuit Court: When Sen. Chuck Schumer asked his opinion on Roe, Kavanaugh dodged, responding that he would “follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully” because the case is “binding precedent of the Court,” but refusing to share his own view. While Supreme Court decisions are indeed binding on lower courts, the Supreme Court can overturn itself, and Kavanaugh has shown that he’s not sympathetic to abortion rights. Kavanaugh has applauded the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s view that “unenumerated rights could be recognized by the courts only if the asserted right was rooted in the nation’s history and tradition,” — in other words, that rights which are not specifically granted by the Constitution must at least have been traditionally accorded to the American people. He believes Supreme Court precedent already conflicts with itself on this issue – a perfect opening for overturning Roe. And he also heard an important abortion case when he was on the D.C. Circuit Court, and held that the government was not imposing an “undue burden” on an undocumented teenager by not letting her terminate her pregnancy in a timely manner. (That decision was overturned, and Kavanaugh vigorously dissented).

http://time.com/5336630/kavanaugh-roe-v-wade/

Omg
You are so thick.

You don't know anything about American politics.

Hell, the Libtards in the Senate don't even know legal protocols.

All they can do is piss and moan like the losers that they are.

Trump poll ratings are at 40% the pissing and moaning goes far and wide it appears. It also appears you don't know very little.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com