#Login Register

  • 19 Vote(s) - 3.26 Average

Cell phones 'More Dangerous Than Kalashnikovs'
03-10-2011, 02:43 AM #1
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:41,346 Threads:1,581 Joined:Feb 2011
This is a study of a 'researcher' who just happens to be 'acting professor of social and cultural anthropology at Helsinki University'. This is where the drones are being programmed and this is the main national news in Finland...

Quote:Upheaval in developing countries might not be as widespread without mobile phones, according to a Finnish researcher. Mobiles have accelerated the unrest and strengthened the opposition in countries undergoing unrest. This has been evident recently in North Africa.
Anthropologists from around the world are waiting to explore the use of mobile phones in the Arab unrest. One of the pioneers in the field is Finnish researcher Sirpa Tenhunen. She has studied mobile phones as a political tool in Africa and India. In opposition hands, mobile phones are a powerful tool.
”You could say that from the regime’s point of view, mobile phones are more dangerous than Kalashnikovs,” says Tenhunen, who is currently an acting professor of social and cultural anthropology at Helsinki University.
Mobiles gather troops quickly
In developing countries, mobile phones are more common than televisions, newspapers or computers. An average of one in three Africans has a mobile phone, whereas only six percent have access to the internet. Slow internet connections increase the cost of time spent online.
According to Tenhunen’s research, mobile phone use speeds up political action. Whereas before it took a month to organise a general strike, now a large group can be roused in ten minutes with a text message.
Part of the power of cell phones is in the invisibility they grant to actors. Potential revolutionaries can mobilise in secret more easily. In the Arab countries experiencing upheaval there has been surprise at the protests, and it is still difficult to identify leaders.
”Regimes can’t put anyone under house arrest or in prison, because they can’t pick up opposition leaders so easily,” says Tenhunen.
Regime Counter-attacks
Oppressive regimes often also turn off phone and internet connections in an attempt to maintain control. The most active in this regard have been Iran and China. Tenhunen points out that when people use the word ’Tibet’ on the phone in China, the security services often begin surveillance.
Tenhunen would not like to predict which direction the current upheaval will take: strionger democracy and civil society, or a re-assertion of control by the challenged regimes. the outcome will, according to Tenhunen, depend on who best utilises the new technology and netowrks.


I notice how they but cell phones in with mainstream news outlets and the likes...lol

"mobile phones are more common than televisions, newspapers or computers"



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com