#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Chemo and Radiation Actually Make Cancer More Malignant
08-01-2012, 10:35 PM #1
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,775 Threads:1,181 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:Radiotherapy has been shown to increase the survival and self-renewing capacity of these breast cancer initiating cells by up to 30-fold, which means that while a radiation treatment may initially regress a tumor's volume/mass, it may actually be selecting out the more radiation-resistant and aggressive subpopulation of tumor cells which ultimately lead to higher malignancy. This promotion of self-initiating cancer cells is also true for chemotherapy, of course.

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/chem...-make.html

This is exactly what has happened to my b-i-l gaah.gif tissueguy.gif the cancer in his lungs has stalled but malignant cells have moved into his shoulders, neck and towards his brain. So what are they doing? Giving him more chemotherapy. Once you get cancer, you're just a vehicle for industry profits.
08-01-2012, 11:01 PM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,572 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
Riding the on the Chemo gravy train only works if you're on the giving end. There are plenty of alternative and very successful treatments without Chemo. I just cant fathom the mindset that would not educate themselves to make an informed decision when it comes to life and death.

wonder.gif
08-01-2012, 11:07 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,357 Threads:1,482 Joined:Feb 2011
That's just so freakin sad and frustrating Shadow sad2.gif

Quote: Once you get cancer, you're just a vehicle for industry profits.

That's just the cold and cruel truth.

Also let us not forget about the mammograms that also provides radiation while screening for tumors. gaah.gif

Quote:The European Cancer Observatory (2011) recommends mammography every 2 - 3 years between 50 and 69.[2] These task force reports point out that in addition to unnecessary surgery and anxiety, the risks of more frequent mammograms include a small but significant increase in breast cancer induced by radiation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammography

gaah.gif
08-01-2012, 11:34 PM #4
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,775 Threads:1,181 Joined:Feb 2011
Breast Cancer Rates Soar after Mammograms


(NaturalNews) A report just published in the Journal of the American Medical Association's Archives of Internal Medicine (Arch Intern Med. 2008;168[21]:2302-2303) reaches a startling conclusion. Breast cancer rates increased significantly in four Norwegian counties after women there began getting mammograms every two years. In fact, according to background information in the study, the start of screening mammography programs throughout Europe has been associated with increased incidence of breast cancer.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024901.html#ixzz22KRAHJM5

If the gov (aka industry) is for it, I'm agin it. lol.gif
08-01-2012, 11:38 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,357 Threads:1,482 Joined:Feb 2011
It's a damned good reason to be suspicious at least. chuckle.gif
08-02-2012, 12:22 AM #6
yankees skier
Posts:5,889 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
Cancer treatments are big business. That's why cures will never hit the market.

Biere.
08-03-2012, 02:04 PM #7
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,357 Threads:1,482 Joined:Feb 2011
Women 'duped over benefits of breast cancer screening': Charity deserves an Oscar say scientists

-Experts say cancer charity was overselling benefits of X-ray checks

- Misleading stats are persuading women to undergo mammography without knowing full facts, claim U.S. duo

- They say advertising campaign failed to acknowledge that survival rates are distorted by the process of screening

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...ening.html

Quote:The actual benefit is small, they claim. Mammography results in a reduction in the chance that a woman in her 50s will die from breast cancer over the next ten years from 0.53 per cent to 0.46 per cent, a difference of 0.07 percentage points, they said.

In addition, harms are overlooked including false alarms requiring a biopsy and overdiagnosis – where women are treated for cancers that would have never have produced symptoms.

The US critics claim: 'For every life saved by mammography, around two in ten women are overdiagnosed. Women who are overdiagnosed cannot benefit from unnecessary chemotherapy, radiation or surgery.'



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com