(04-14-2014, 06:38 PM)Cynicalabsurdance Wrote:(04-14-2014, 04:11 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:(04-12-2014, 06:05 PM)Gumby Wrote: The courts need to step in on this. The Bundy family acquired this land via the 'Homestead Act of 1862"
There should be no dispute on this. Or any water rights there.
The problem is he hasn't paid his grazing fees in 20 years, so he may be up s**t creek without his cattle. This is definitely going to court.
THE PROBLEM IS
FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS THE BLM
HAS BEEN RUNNING EVERY RANHCER
OUT OF THAT AREA AND ACROSS THE USA IN EXACT LIKE MANNER
THEY INSTIGATED THIS shït WITH BUNDY , OVER 20 YEARS AGO
AND HE REFUSED TO PAY THEM MONEY THAT HELPS THEM COMMIT CRIMES
AGAINST HIM AND OTHERS
JUST AS I STOPPED PAYING TAXES
BECAUSE I WAS KIDNAPPED AND TORTURED BY NSA AGENTS FOR A TREASURE I OWNED
THEY VIOLATE HIM AND OTHERS
AND BY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
THAT IS A CRIME
AND YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GIVE IT SUPPORT
OTHERWISE YOU BECOME COMPLICIT
AND THIS THREAD IS BEING MONITORED BY NSA AS I TYPE THIS
OK , ANYONE ELSE HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR THESE ABUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ?
Hi Cy, I worded that wrongly. I meant the problem FOR HIM now in the legal system is the not paying those grazing fees; the prosecutor will have a field day with that. He should have caused this rukus 20 years ago or protested where those fees should have gone...but better late than never.