#Login Register


  • 10 Vote(s) - 2.3 Average
Home 


Could this be the actual Roswell craft?
05-08-2013, 09:22 AM #46
Capt kwirk Member
Posts:386 Threads:50 Joined:Apr 2013
(05-07-2013, 05:58 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(05-07-2013, 05:48 PM)Wolf Pup Wrote:  Very interesting. If you zoom in on the picture, it almost looks like an alien sitting under it with his legs crossed.


It does look like that! damned.gif
dark skinned seems to be leaning a bit to it's right?

it's a gif

t-dancing.gif

JollyRoger Show this Post
05-08-2013, 09:45 AM #47
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
You've been snookered, my friend. This is a still from the Twilight Zone episode "Death Ship" .
JollyRoger Show this Post
05-08-2013, 10:51 AM #48
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 


Fast forward to 4:40
05-08-2013, 11:28 AM #49
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,382 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
hi5.gif Holy crap! You nailed it Jolly R! Doesn't make the subjects here in the thread any less fascinating but yeah... pic debunked. cheers.gif

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-08-2013, 12:55 PM #50
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(05-08-2013, 10:51 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg7t25D2hwQ

Fast forward to 4:40


Well now... could of used your help sooner!! like years ago!

I guess someone must of old timeyied up a shot and put it online.

...at least now I get to see what it looks like up close with people walking around and the inside of it LOL!

Was I pretty convincing eh? I thought i was really onto something with this recent testimony describing that weight ...I thought for sure now this photo had to be real. I suppose I should watch more twilight zone?

...they did however seem to base that shot off the Roswell crash. Maybe they more accurately recreated the early witness accounts then what most people have recreated today? or it's just a cheap prop!
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-08-2013, 01:04 PM #51
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(05-08-2013, 08:29 AM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  Ever hear of Philip Schneider? > http://www.ufodigest.com/mystery.html

This is mind blowing,fascinating and frightening...

Heres just one video of many other "talks" he gave that were filmed and recorded shortly before being murdered >

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9jy5ecyT94


Yes... very familiar. I link that sometimes for people. Have watched it couple times plus his other lectures online.

Phil is one of the heaviest most direct disclosure people to ever come out... who else has PHYSICAL SAMPLES! ...and massive scars to back up his story!
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-08-2013, 01:09 PM #52
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(05-08-2013, 11:28 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  hi5.gif Holy crap! You nailed it Jolly R! Doesn't make the subjects here in the thread any less fascinating but yeah... pic debunked. cheers.gif


...ya but there goes my evidence that it was Vril craft unless of course that prop was based off a very accurate testimony but we have know way of noing that.

I still stand by everything else I said and still feel it was likely a vril craft as that is what we were getting flaps of during that period and account for many sitings since ...but certainly not all. All sort of varied species visit or have business here... some of them get shot down for no other reason then being in "our" space but it is not necessarily "us" shooting them down.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-08-2013, 02:01 PM #53
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
hmm.gif

After hearing that new testimony where the guy talks about seeing that autopsy film would seemingly validate the guys who hoaxed it who claimed to also see the real thing... makes me wonder how many people out there were allowed to see that material ...including no doubt a photo that may have been very similar to this one?

...that episode had an alien theme to it. Strange that saucer in the episode was also man made. The characters in it were the pilots ...but what I noticed in particular was the person shaped indentations in the chairs ...which made me think of this from the autopsy film...
İmage
If we can assume those hoaxers were telling the truth in their documentary(which I can't seem to find now ...had an old google vid link to it that no longer works :( about viewing the real thing then can we also assume that others who saw this material may have slipped it into a show like this? Real stuff ends up in movies all the time. Philidelphia experiment being on of the classics ...it seems we are allowed to see recreations of the real thing but never the actual real thing unless distorted. Makes me wonder if their might be other fake material out there that is accurate modeled..? kinda throws a whole loop into trying to decipher what is real from fake. If one has a instinct for such things you will get false positives off stuff like this ...maybe whoever photo shopped the autopsy alien in one of the versions of this floating around was trying to tell us something? ...or am I just stretching too much?

They also call the ship "Starship 51".
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-08-2013, 02:34 PM #54
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Oh! Here it is!


I didn't think this one was it!
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-08-2013, 02:41 PM #55
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
@7:20
05-08-2013, 04:54 PM #56
Ruby Wolf Member
Posts:10,255 Threads:721 Joined:Oct 2012
(05-08-2013, 09:45 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  You've been snookered, my friend. This is a still from the Twilight Zone episode "Death Ship" .

Thats okay,good find and may the truth set us free and anyways,this thread went far beyond the original photo and into other mysterious and relevant subjects...
05-08-2013, 07:02 PM #57
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:10,340 Threads:231 Joined:Feb 2011
(05-08-2013, 02:11 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(05-08-2013, 12:54 AM)Jackinthebox Wrote:  Doubt it. Too perfect. At best I would expect a field of debris.


It wasn't "shot down". It didn't crash in a free fall.

The fields that levitate these craft can be destabilized by intense focused radar waves within a certain frequency modulation ...forcing them down. Their "drives" don't fail entirely. Which explains the amount of damage caused by a hard landing.


That's exactly how it was brought down

and it was at Whitesands Missile range where the tech was being experimented with


FOUR went down over a couple weeks, ( more like ten days time )

and the Military did not TRY to bring these down

it was simply a result of the experiment .
05-08-2013, 07:21 PM #58
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:10,340 Threads:231 Joined:Feb 2011
quote :There were reports of two crash sites. Not many were aware of this and it added to the confusion by conflicting witness accounts.


as i said

my father was a Staff Sgt. at walker in 1947

he ran the post office on the base when the call came into the switch board

from the sheriff who had Max brazel in his office

Dad helped clean up the First Craft ( there were four crashes around White Sands )

He took me to the sight when I was 27 in 1982 .

and YES classified projects are given to screen writers

so if the public witnesses something

or something is leaked

it can be claimed they watch too many movies .

each of the four craft were visiting Victorio Peak on Whitesands

a hoard of treasure was inside of the peak .

figure it out from there .

I was taken to the peak in Oct. 1961 on a Craft to show me
the Army removing some of the treasure .

Figure that one out


and for Lisa Boxx

be careful with your mouth .
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-09-2013, 01:59 AM #59
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(05-07-2013, 06:51 PM)Cynicalabsurdance Wrote:  FYI

I've been to the site a few times

My Dad was there with the clean up crew

He also lived and died Just south of the Crash site

in Tula Rosa New Mexico where Max Brazel ( The original finder of the crashed craft )
owned a Truck Tire Shop after the Gov't. paid for his secrecy .


Dad was a Staff Sgt. with 509th 1947 through 1953 at Roswell Army Air Base
Known as Walker Air Base .


That wouldn't by any chance have anything to do with UFO radar signals being referred to as "fast walkers"?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
05-09-2013, 02:19 AM #60
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(05-08-2013, 07:02 PM)Cynicalabsurdance Wrote:  
(05-08-2013, 02:11 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(05-08-2013, 12:54 AM)Jackinthebox Wrote:  Doubt it. Too perfect. At best I would expect a field of debris.


It wasn't "shot down". It didn't crash in a free fall.

The fields that levitate these craft can be destabilized by intense focused radar waves within a certain frequency modulation ...forcing them down. Their "drives" don't fail entirely. Which explains the amount of damage caused by a hard landing.


That's exactly how it was brought down

and it was at Whitesands Missile range where the tech was being experimented with


FOUR went down over a couple weeks, ( more like ten days time )

and the Military did not TRY to bring these down

it was simply a result of the experiment .


hmm.gif

That would seem to conflict with the Boyd Bushman testimony which is one I am liking... however I also heard one version where a craft was having trouble maneuvering and made for an easy target so they had a jet that was tailing it take it out with an air to air ...I also have to wonder how many accounts out there get the "Roswell" tag when they are real stories of separate instances ...I have heard that worldwide every year enough UFOs go down(are taken down) to fill a football field.

Could those experiments have been for weaponizing radar? unbeknownst to many there? ...or perhaps the weaponization came later after they discovered the effect it had on these saucers?

...I always liked this footage here as it appears like this UFO may have been targeted by one of these radar weapons so it flew over a city to prevent it from being taken down in a populated area ...it could however just be a prankster's balloon?
İmage



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com