#Login Register

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Desperation or just didn't care?
05-29-2013, 04:46 AM #1
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,775 Threads:1,181 Joined:Feb 2011
Caution!!! Not a nice vid sad2.gif

JollyRoger Show this Post
05-29-2013, 04:54 AM #2
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
I heard about this. That woman is a piece of shït. She should have flushed herself.
JollyRoger Show this Post
05-29-2013, 04:57 AM #3
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
Maybe she was beyond her allotted amount of babies and didn't want to go to prison for having another. Isn't there some law where it says they can only have so many children there?
05-29-2013, 06:17 AM #4
DiggerDawg Member
Posts:433 Threads:34 Joined:Sep 2012
Unpopular birth restrictions introduced in 1980 when population was rapidly expanding
Has led to huge gender imbalance - as parents favour boys over girls - and contributed to aging workforce
Proposal to phase out the policy put forward by officials close to the Chinese government
Two-child policy planned for 2015 and all birth restrictions could be lifted by 2020

Is China about to scrap its one-child policy? Government think tank urges leaders to allow two children per family by 2015



Yes and i cant judge i am not in there shoes



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com