#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Dewey Larson's Reciprocal Systems Theory And The Daniel Papers
08-14-2013, 09:46 PM #1
Irie Lion Member
Posts:76 Threads:9 Joined:Aug 2013
This goes in my 'gray basket' as if this stuff is the real deal or not, but I find it EXTREMELY interesting. But take it with a grain of salt obviously.

Some background: Daniel is one of David Wilcock's 'insiders'. The one he talked about that claimed to have worked at Montauk. Now Daniel finally came forward and started his own website (links below) and has written a series of papers that in my opinion are fascinating.

Anything associated with David Wilcock definitely throws up a red flag. However Daniel has actually called out Wilcock on a lot of his new agey and phony bs he publishes on his site.

After reading Daniel's papers and his take on things I find him highly intelligent. Either he is a genius or certified lunatic. Still not quite sure.

The reason these alternative sciences fascinate me is because I truly believe academia has been hijacked and important science is being suppressed in the name of greed and control. Mainly to suppress energy and propulsion systems. The oil men wanna keep selling you that black gold. I actually have a small little piece of my own insider knowledge when it comes to this so I know this is the case. I believe science is purposely pointed in the wrong direction in mainstream academia to keep these discoveries at bay and hidden. Dead ends such as the un-provable String and M-Theories. The waste of time and money on CERN, etc.

One known example of this was the study of electrogravitics in the 1950s. Physics journals the world over had publications on this field of research. This is around the same time T. Townsend Brown started making breakthroughs in this area. Almost immediately after the breakthroughs were made the subject of electrogravitics almost disappeared over night from all the physics journals. Now who would have that kind of power?


Ok back to Daniel...
Daniel bases most of his work on Dewey Larson's Reciprocal Systems theory which is a very elegant theory that makes a lot of sense to me. One thing the theory predicts is that stars actually use fission reactions instead of fusion reactions. That star evolution as taught now, is backwards. They go from dust balls, then coalesce into red giants, then orange stars, then yellow stars, then blue-white stars burning hotter and hotter. He claims our star will soon transition from yellow to blue-white and when it does it will go black for a few days during the transition. He also talks about the concept of time-space and how it relates to space-time.

Take this all with a grain of salt. But his papers are definitely worth a read for the novelty factor alone.

His papers are here:
http://www.conscioushugs.com/daniel-papers/

And I'd start with this one. Be warned these are PDFs.
Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP,World Orders, Time Lines and Ascension

http://www.conscioushugs.com/wp-content/...eering.pdf
08-14-2013, 10:43 PM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
I came as far as to 'David Wilcock'

fatman.gif

How can he expect to be taken seriously with puffy sleeves?
08-14-2013, 10:45 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Seriously, I look like an East German wrestler in puffy sleeves damned.gif
08-14-2013, 10:57 PM #4
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:8,261 Threads:191 Joined:Feb 2011
I eat , fart , shït , and sneeze ,,,


what else do I need to know but that ?




08-14-2013, 11:02 PM #5
Irie Lion Member
Posts:76 Threads:9 Joined:Aug 2013
(08-14-2013, 10:43 PM)Octo Wrote:  I came as far as to 'David Wilcock'

fatman.gif

How can he expect to be taken seriously with puffy sleeves?


I'm not sure why he would even reference Gayvid Edgar Racock at all in his paper, given that he knows he has no credibility or at least has as recently as a month or so ago on his site. But if you read the paper it is quite interesting. Maybe I'm just a physics geek.
08-14-2013, 11:03 PM #6
Irie Lion Member
Posts:76 Threads:9 Joined:Aug 2013
(08-14-2013, 10:43 PM)Octo Wrote:  I came as far as to 'David Wilcock'

fatman.gif

How can he expect to be taken seriously with puffy sleeves?


I want to see this! lol.gif I must be blind, were on his site do you see a photo of him?

08-14-2013, 11:07 PM #7
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
No I didn't go to his site, I just saw enough of his stuff to notice his favorite outfit (all photo ops).
08-14-2013, 11:18 PM #8
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(08-14-2013, 11:03 PM)Irie Lion Wrote:  
(08-14-2013, 10:43 PM)Octo Wrote:  I came as far as to 'David Wilcock'

fatman.gif

How can he expect to be taken seriously with puffy sleeves?


I want to see this! lol.gif I must be blind, were on his site do you see a photo of him?


Apparently you can even afford to pay attention. We have a perfectly fine search function. I'd do it for you, but I'm busy.

Just browse our wilcock threads
08-14-2013, 11:26 PM #9
Irie Lion Member
Posts:76 Threads:9 Joined:Aug 2013
(08-14-2013, 11:18 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(08-14-2013, 11:03 PM)Irie Lion Wrote:  
(08-14-2013, 10:43 PM)Octo Wrote:  I came as far as to 'David Wilcock'

fatman.gif

How can he expect to be taken seriously with puffy sleeves?


I want to see this! lol.gif I must be blind, were on his site do you see a photo of him?


Apparently you can even afford to pay attention. We have a perfectly fine search function. I'd do it for you, but I'm busy.

Just browse our wilcock threads


oh I thought you were talking about Daniel. No thanks then. I don't really want to look at Fraudcock right now
omg.gif
08-14-2013, 11:27 PM #10
Irie Lion Member
Posts:76 Threads:9 Joined:Aug 2013
double post
08-14-2013, 11:32 PM #11
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Meh, I think I'll just chill for the rest of the evening



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com