(03-04-2013, 03:32 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:(03-04-2013, 03:08 AM)Kanigo2 Wrote:(03-04-2013, 02:57 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:(03-04-2013, 02:48 AM)Kanigo2 Wrote: Post 20 and 26 , you are so completely full of shït your ears are leaking.
Is there ever a day that you will just admit you dont know afucking thing except what you have been told by your midget master?
Go take a flying ƒükking leap off a tall bridge.
Every bullshit line you sprw takes everyone five steps further from the truth.
At least next time throw a disclaimer that it is what you hypothesize and nothing else.
Then leave it there, instead of jumping from forum to fum, making post after post with your bullshit insight over things you are completely clueless about.
People WAY MORE QUALIFIED. Will resolve it and at least give us the gist ofit in due time.
Please highlight what was incorrect in what I've put forward K2. You have been an avid observer of this whole scene and were present for all of this, so your input is appreciated, but I don't see where anything I have stated was incorrect.
Contrary to your hypothesis, the actual technical aspects of diagnosing a DDos attack,counterventing and finding those responsible for it looks absolutely NOTHING like your posts.
IS THAT ENOUGH?
I will simply reference you to where that information comes from
[url= https://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Sustain...]Sustained attacks on LOP, sorry for the inconvenience! Post: #1178 [/url]
Quote:I am pretty sure the first time we went down was Rory. Same attack as he owned up to. Prolly no coincidence either that different site owners came to the same conclusion.The later attacks were different though.
D states that this attack is was the same as the attack in December that Rory claimed responsibility for through STS. He also states that the second wave of attacks were of some different signature, which is why I stated this
Quote:The initial attacks had all the markings of a repeat attack by Rory and his crew, but it appears someone else took over the attack sometime yesterday.
Unless you have access to the logs and can refute what D is saying, this is what we have to go on. Tridget's word could never be taken as gospel, at least by thinking people, but his claims it was the same person does not make a liar of D.
The rest of my post is sharing background information that is publicly available. I'm not sure what you're saying is a hypothesis. The only things that I said that can be refuted have been by STS above, where he claims that he created the tinychat in the first place, which is entirely plausible, and claims he never approached these people about joining the attacks in December. That claim implies that several unconnected people, who later had their names trashed and received various forms of threats both online and off, are liars and trying to frame him. Take that for what it's worth.
several people i have never heard of. nice agenda.