#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Do all of the sites being attacked have the same server?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-04-2013, 03:34 AM #46
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-04-2013, 03:32 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 03:08 AM)Kanigo2 Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 02:57 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 02:48 AM)Kanigo2 Wrote:  Post 20 and 26 , you are so completely full of shït your ears are leaking.

Is there ever a day that you will just admit you dont know afucking thing except what you have been told by your midget master?

Go take a flying ğkking leap off a tall bridge.

--------

Every bullshit line you sprw takes everyone five steps further from the truth.


At least next time throw a disclaimer that it is what you hypothesize and nothing else.

Then leave it there, instead of jumping from forum to fum, making post after post with your bullshit insight over things you are completely clueless about.

-----

People WAY MORE QUALIFIED. Will resolve it and at least give us the gist ofit in due time.


One word,

Patience.


Please highlight what was incorrect in what I've put forward K2. You have been an avid observer of this whole scene and were present for all of this, so your input is appreciated, but I don't see where anything I have stated was incorrect.


Contrary to your hypothesis, the actual technical aspects of diagnosing a DDos attack,counterventing and finding those responsible for it looks absolutely NOTHING like your posts.

IS THAT ENOUGH?

:facefin:


I will simply reference you to where that information comes from
[url= https://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Sustain...]Sustained attacks on LOP, sorry for the inconvenience! Post: #1178 [/url]

Quote:I am pretty sure the first time we went down was Rory. Same attack as he owned up to. Prolly no coincidence either that different site owners came to the same conclusion.The later attacks were different though.

D states that this attack is was the same as the attack in December that Rory claimed responsibility for through STS. He also states that the second wave of attacks were of some different signature, which is why I stated this

Quote:The initial attacks had all the markings of a repeat attack by Rory and his crew, but it appears someone else took over the attack sometime yesterday.

Unless you have access to the logs and can refute what D is saying, this is what we have to go on. Tridget's word could never be taken as gospel, at least by thinking people, but his claims it was the same person does not make a liar of D.

The rest of my post is sharing background information that is publicly available. I'm not sure what you're saying is a hypothesis. The only things that I said that can be refuted have been by STS above, where he claims that he created the tinychat in the first place, which is entirely plausible, and claims he never approached these people about joining the attacks in December. That claim implies that several unconnected people, who later had their names trashed and received various forms of threats both online and off, are liars and trying to frame him. Take that for what it's worth.


several people i have never heard of. nice agenda.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
03-04-2013, 03:35 AM #47
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(03-04-2013, 03:32 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  [url= https://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Sustain...]Sustained attacks on LOP, sorry for the inconvenience! Post: #1178 [/url]


It appears the link broke.
https://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Sustain...pid5313831
03-04-2013, 03:38 AM #48
Mister Kitters (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Posts:518 Threads:52 Joined:Mar 2013
(03-04-2013, 03:34 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 03:32 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 03:08 AM)Kanigo2 Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 02:57 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(03-04-2013, 02:48 AM)Kanigo2 Wrote:  Post 20 and 26 , you are so completely full of shït your ears are leaking.

Is there ever a day that you will just admit you dont know afucking thing except what you have been told by your midget master?

Go take a flying ğkking leap off a tall bridge.

--------

Every bullshit line you sprw takes everyone five steps further from the truth.


At least next time throw a disclaimer that it is what you hypothesize and nothing else.

Then leave it there, instead of jumping from forum to fum, making post after post with your bullshit insight over things you are completely clueless about.

-----

People WAY MORE QUALIFIED. Will resolve it and at least give us the gist ofit in due time.


One word,

Patience.


Please highlight what was incorrect in what I've put forward K2. You have been an avid observer of this whole scene and were present for all of this, so your input is appreciated, but I don't see where anything I have stated was incorrect.


Contrary to your hypothesis, the actual technical aspects of diagnosing a DDos attack,counterventing and finding those responsible for it looks absolutely NOTHING like your posts.

IS THAT ENOUGH?

:facefin:


I will simply reference you to where that information comes from
[url= https://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Sustain...]Sustained attacks on LOP, sorry for the inconvenience! Post: #1178 [/url]

Quote:I am pretty sure the first time we went down was Rory. Same attack as he owned up to. Prolly no coincidence either that different site owners came to the same conclusion.The later attacks were different though.

D states that this attack is was the same as the attack in December that Rory claimed responsibility for through STS. He also states that the second wave of attacks were of some different signature, which is why I stated this

Quote:The initial attacks had all the markings of a repeat attack by Rory and his crew, but it appears someone else took over the attack sometime yesterday.

Unless you have access to the logs and can refute what D is saying, this is what we have to go on. Tridget's word could never be taken as gospel, at least by thinking people, but his claims it was the same person does not make a liar of D.

The rest of my post is sharing background information that is publicly available. I'm not sure what you're saying is a hypothesis. The only things that I said that can be refuted have been by STS above, where he claims that he created the tinychat in the first place, which is entirely plausible, and claims he never approached these people about joining the attacks in December. That claim implies that several unconnected people, who later had their names trashed and received various forms of threats both online and off, are liars and trying to frame him. Take that for what it's worth.


several people i have never heard of. nice agenda.


This part is especially interesting to me.

Being myself.. I think I would know if I ever threatened anyone or asked anyone to do anything.

Since I know I did not.. I have to assume you are a liar.. and that negates your entire testimony.. in my eyes.

And in the end.. those are the only eyes that matter in this whole thing.. because when it all comes down.. if it ever does.. I guarantee that I am left standing with clean hands.

Enjoy your witch hunt..

I question the general assumption that felines are inherently deficient in the area of grammar and sentence structure.
03-04-2013, 03:38 AM #49
sweet Member
Posts:60 Threads:3 Joined:Aug 2012
(03-04-2013, 03:32 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  not too hard to figure out a possible motive. has made sense to me since the beginning. who reported the attack first? GLP and GLP was also the only site that was actually standing during the initial attacks. suddenly trinity posts a thread stating this rory character is responsible and disturbed runs with it. never any evidence. so, motive? how about looking at the worth of the sites involved. who would have the money to hire out an attack this size? GLP. what would they gain? well post 4 pinned threads about a terrible hacker, say you have to lock down the site and reinstate wide ranging bans, and charge people money to be able to follow the story. makes sense to me like i said. follow the money.

Jesus Kang, everything is not about Jason. Why are you so obsessed with him?



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com