#Login Register

  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average

EU Official Slams Secrecy Over Fukushima Radiation
06-04-2011, 02:22 PM #1
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,202 Threads:1,487 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:Following complaints from citizens, the European Ombudsman has opened an investigation into the EU's permitted levels of food contamination following the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan and their communication to the wider public. Similar complaints are also being heard in France.

"Based on complaints submitted to me, it appears that a number of Union citizens perceive a lack of precise and reliable information as regards the changes made to the maximum permitted levels in the aftermath of the Fukushima accident," wrote EU Ombudsman P. Nikiforos Diamandouros in a letter addressed to European Commission President José Manuel Barroso on 19 May.

Diamandouros noted that while the EU executive's websites provide links to relevant adopted legislation (297/2011 and 351/2011), "no comparative information on the maximum permitted levels before and after the Fukushima accident has apparently been made available".

Therefore, the Ombudsman decided to launch an own-initiative inquiry into the matter as a way to provide "citizen-friendly" information.

He asked the Commission to submit an opinion on the issue by 30 June 2011, calling for "precise figures, preferably also in the form of graphs and charts, which would allow an easy identification of the maximum permitted levels in force" both before and after the Japanese nuclear accident.

French authorities pressed to evaluate Fukushima fallout

The Ombudsman's request for more transparency in communicating data to the public was not isolated.

Last week (25 May), a French NGO specialised in measuring radioactivity, CRIIRAD, asked the French government to investigate what it described as "serious failures" in measuring the impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident in France and communicating the results to the public.

According to the NGO, the radioactive cloud from the stricken reactors at Japan's Fukushima nuclear power plant reached France two days earlier than officially announced. In addition, the levels of radioactive iodine-131 were 20 times higher on 22 March than announced on 24 March, according to the NGO's findings.

CRIIRAD reached its conclusions after analysing data recorded by the French National Network for the Measurement of Radioactivity in the Environment (RNM), an official body.

In a letter addressed to French Prime Minister François Fillon and the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN), CRIIRAD questions in particular the work of the country's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) and demands an investigation into the chronology of facts and the responsibilities of the different actors involved in informing the public about the Fukushima fallout.

But the IRSN refuted the accusations, saying that the NGO had come to its conclusions based on surveys that correspond to several days of measurement rather than a single day, and reaffirmed that the fallout had probably reached France on 24 March as initially announced.

CRIIRAD also continues to condemn the authorities' "secrecy" regarding public access to data on radioactive contamination. Shortly after the 11 March earthquake and tsunami that hit the Japanese nuclear plant, the NGO launched an international "petition for total transparency on the airborne radioactivity we are breathing".

More than two months after the nuclear accident, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) admitted last week that three out of six reactors at the nuclear plant suffered meltdowns within days of the 11 March earthquake and tsunami, raising worrying questions about why the scale of the disaster was not disclosed sooner.

It's about time. Levels in the US are horrible, everything is dead in 20 years and the media and government are in denial. They can spend billions to fondle children in airports but cant get a this disaster under control. The only positive thing is lawmakers are sucking it up like the rest of us, we'll all have time to sort this out in hell.


06-04-2011, 02:46 PM #2
Shadow Incognito Anonymous
hug.gif Hej JR. Your hat is charming!! rofl.gif rofl.gif rofl.gif

Gov here is lying like a sidewalk too. Announced they won't be testing at all because it isn't a concern. How do they know it's not a concern if they don't test it? dunno.gif
06-04-2011, 03:56 PM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,202 Threads:1,487 Joined:Feb 2011
Thanks, glad you noticed. I spent a lot of money on it 13.gif


06-04-2011, 04:08 PM #4
Shadow Incognito Anonymous
chuckle.gif that friggin hat sold for $131k on ebay rofl.gif
06-05-2011, 08:14 AM #5
Ghostie Member
Posts:953 Threads:212 Joined:Mar 2011
(06-04-2011, 04:08 PM)Shadow Wrote:  chuckle.gif that friggin hat sold for $131k on ebay rofl.gif

i did she /octo stop at your hair or are yousporting newly colored toe nails? 13.gif13.gif

and of course the e.u won't tell the public keeping the public in the dark is what gov's of the world do best and will continue to dodamned.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-05-2011, 10:27 AM #6
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
Nice hat jr lol.gif thats a pretty fancy toilett seat-3x7sc



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com