#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Employment discrimination
09-18-2013, 05:23 AM #16
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,621 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Are you living under the impression that sports in Europe are owned by govts hahahhaha?
09-18-2013, 05:29 AM #17
Exeter Incognito Anonymous
 
(09-18-2013, 05:23 AM)Octo Wrote:  Are you living under the impression that sports in Europe are owned by govts hahahhaha?

In most European countries they are, and they don't get paid anywhere near as much.

and a long time ago now, they were here in the USA too, and they lived next door to carpenters, plumbers, accountants and cab drivers and pizza shop owners.


im not saying its a good or a bad thing, it has pros and cons.
09-18-2013, 05:30 AM #18
j browsing Member
Posts:5,158 Threads:1,098 Joined:Jul 2012
(09-18-2013, 05:16 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:17 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:08 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:05 AM)j browsing Wrote:  and as far as private ownership..it's called capitalism..if you were American you would know this lmao.giflmao.gif

sometimes when a business is so big and serves so many people so often, they take it for granted, and forget it is a private company.

that's part of the reason women have tried to sue to get in. lol

:)

bull crap again..teams and owners who are pros belong to a league regulated by a commissioner..again if you are American you would know this ..ever hear of the NFL????lmao.giflmao.gif

he NFL is a private organization

also the affirmative action policies do not protect unqualified workers.

why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

"when life gives you lemons..throw them at someone"...Grumpy Cat good.png
09-18-2013, 05:32 AM #19
Exeter Incognito Anonymous
 
(09-18-2013, 05:30 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:16 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:17 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:08 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:05 AM)j browsing Wrote:  and as far as private ownership..it's called capitalism..if you were American you would know this lmao.giflmao.gif

sometimes when a business is so big and serves so many people so often, they take it for granted, and forget it is a private company.

that's part of the reason women have tried to sue to get in. lol

:)

bull crap again..teams and owners who are pros belong to a league regulated by a commissioner..again if you are American you would know this ..ever hear of the NFL????lmao.giflmao.gif

he NFL is a private organization

also the affirmative action policies do not protect unqualified workers.

why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

In the same way that every single woman, who ever tried to play in a mans league was outperformed so badly by the men, that they were ran off the field.

That's my entire point.
09-18-2013, 05:34 AM #20
j browsing Member
Posts:5,158 Threads:1,098 Joined:Jul 2012
oh good grief..

"when life gives you lemons..throw them at someone"...Grumpy Cat good.png
09-18-2013, 05:36 AM #21
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,902 Threads:420 Joined:Jun 2012
(09-18-2013, 05:32 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:30 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:16 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:17 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:08 AM)Exeter Wrote:  sometimes when a business is so big and serves so many people so often, they take it for granted, and forget it is a private company.

that's part of the reason women have tried to sue to get in. lol

:)

bull crap again..teams and owners who are pros belong to a league regulated by a commissioner..again if you are American you would know this ..ever hear of the NFL????lmao.giflmao.gif

he NFL is a private organization

also the affirmative action policies do not protect unqualified workers.

why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

In the same way that every single woman, who ever tried to play in a mans league was outperformed so badly by the men, that they were ran off the field.

That's my entire point.

That comparison is just wrong....go and think about it.
09-18-2013, 05:38 AM #22
Exeter Incognito Anonymous
 
(09-18-2013, 05:36 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:32 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:30 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:16 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 04:17 AM)j browsing Wrote:  bull crap again..teams and owners who are pros belong to a league regulated by a commissioner..again if you are American you would know this ..ever hear of the NFL????lmao.giflmao.gif

he NFL is a private organization

also the affirmative action policies do not protect unqualified workers.

why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

In the same way that every single woman, who ever tried to play in a mans league was outperformed so badly by the men, that they were ran off the field.

That's my entire point.

That comparison is just wrong....go and think about it.

wrong in what way ?

how is somebody who can't physically compete with male athletes any more qualified to play against men...

than a person who can't do math, is qualified to be an accountant ?
09-18-2013, 05:40 AM #23
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,621 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(09-18-2013, 05:29 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:23 AM)Octo Wrote:  Are you living under the impression that sports in Europe are owned by govts hahahhaha?

In most European countries they are, and they don't get paid anywhere near as much.

and a long time ago now, they were here in the USA too, and they lived next door to carpenters, plumbers, accountants and cab drivers and pizza shop owners.


im not saying its a good or a bad thing, it has pros and cons.

No you fool, No it's not how it works around here. Do you really think there are govt owned sports teams here??
09-18-2013, 05:43 AM #24
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,902 Threads:420 Joined:Jun 2012
(09-18-2013, 05:38 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:36 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:32 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:30 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:16 AM)Exeter Wrote:  he NFL is a private organization

also the affirmative action policies do not protect unqualified workers.

why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

In the same way that every single woman, who ever tried to play in a mans league was outperformed so badly by the men, that they were ran off the field.

That's my entire point.

That comparison is just wrong....go and think about it.

wrong in what way ?

how is somebody who can't physically compete with male athletes any more qualified to play against men...

than a person who can't do math, is qualified to be an accountant ?

Who has proven women are unable to compete against men.....not you.
09-18-2013, 05:44 AM #25
j browsing Member
Posts:5,158 Threads:1,098 Joined:Jul 2012
(09-18-2013, 05:38 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:36 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:32 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:30 AM)j browsing Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:16 AM)Exeter Wrote:  he NFL is a private organization

also the affirmative action policies do not protect unqualified workers.

why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

In the same way that every single woman, who ever tried to play in a mans league was outperformed so badly by the men, that they were ran off the field.

That's my entire point.

That comparison is just wrong....go and think about it.

wrong in what way ?

how is somebody who can't physically compete with male athletes any more qualified to play against men...

than a person who can't do math, is qualified to be an accountant ?

yeah and a surgeon who can't stand the sight of blood....lmao.gif

"when life gives you lemons..throw them at someone"...Grumpy Cat good.png
09-18-2013, 05:45 AM #26
Exeter Incognito Anonymous
 
(09-18-2013, 05:43 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:38 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:36 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:32 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:30 AM)j browsing Wrote:  why the hell should any employer hire any unqualified worker ??????lmao.gif not unless they want to commit financial suicide lmao.gif and be run out of town by their stock holders 37.gif

In the same way that every single woman, who ever tried to play in a mans league was outperformed so badly by the men, that they were ran off the field.

That's my entire point.

That comparison is just wrong....go and think about it.

wrong in what way ?

how is somebody who can't physically compete with male athletes any more qualified to play against men...

than a person who can't do math, is qualified to be an accountant ?

Who has proven women are unable to compete against men.....not you.

Doctors, Scientists, Coaches, and the athletes themselves.

that's who
09-18-2013, 05:53 AM #27
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,621 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(09-18-2013, 05:29 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:23 AM)Octo Wrote:  Are you living under the impression that sports in Europe are owned by govts hahahhaha?

In most European countries they are, and they don't get paid anywhere near as much.

O rly? What European countries would that be?

popcorn2.gif
09-18-2013, 05:56 AM #28
Exeter Incognito Anonymous
 
(09-18-2013, 05:53 AM)Octo Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:29 AM)Exeter Wrote:  
(09-18-2013, 05:23 AM)Octo Wrote:  Are you living under the impression that sports in Europe are owned by govts hahahhaha?

In most European countries they are, and they don't get paid anywhere near as much.

O rly? What European countries would that be?

popcorn2.gif

Britain, France, Germany, The Netherlands, you name it.
09-18-2013, 06:04 AM #29
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,621 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
I was excepting you to at least make an effort there but nooo... 15.gif
09-18-2013, 06:07 AM #30
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,621 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Please tell me you're not really this stupid, just play one on the internet? Yes?



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com