#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Even the Red Cross is corrupt.
07-30-2013, 03:39 PM #1
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
07-30-2013, 03:44 PM #2
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,797 Threads:70 Joined:Feb 2011

Yup.

Actually, up until a few years ago,
the Finnish Red Cross bragged about
being the only suborganization to
control their own finances.

Not sure what that meant in reality...
if true at all.

Man, seems every major worldwide
face-value nobleness turns out to be
horribly corrupt.

:(
07-30-2013, 05:48 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,578 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Nothing is sacred...

vic.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-31-2013, 09:19 AM #4
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-30-2013, 03:39 PM)yankees Wrote:  Red Cross covers up cheap Malaria Cure.


You have to check out how much of their budget is "administrative"...pretty much. There are some "good" organizations (mostly (non mormon) religious ones actually) but they are few and far between.

07-31-2013, 12:43 PM #5
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,265 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Those at the top are always ready to line their pockets in the name of administration. 15.gif

wonder.gif
07-31-2013, 01:01 PM #6
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,797 Threads:70 Joined:Feb 2011

İmage

13.gif
07-31-2013, 01:03 PM #7
bohica Member
Posts:1,590 Threads:194 Joined:Feb 2011
I believe the head of the Salvation Army makes about 13 or 23 thousand $ a year.
The big charities use about 94% of their income for "administration".

There's plenty of room for all God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes!
07-31-2013, 01:21 PM #8
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,797 Threads:70 Joined:Feb 2011

Yup.

Salvation Army seems to do good, effective work.

Kinda gone from the street-view over here, though 13.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-31-2013, 02:46 PM #9
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Interesting

ISSUE: FDA warned consumers not to consume or use Miracle Mineral Solution, an oral liquid solution also known as "Miracle Mineral Supplement" or "MMS." The product, when used as directed, produces an industrial bleach that can cause serious harm to health. The product instructs consumers to mix the 28 percent sodium chlorite solution with an acid such as citrus juice. This mixture produces chlorine dioxide, a potent bleach used for stripping textiles and industrial water treatment. High oral doses of this bleach, such as those recommended in the labeling, can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and symptoms of severe dehydration

http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/Safet...220756.htm
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-31-2013, 02:48 PM #10
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
07-31-2013, 10:53 PM #11
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,881 Threads:420 Joined:Jun 2012
http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2013/05/fake-...s-malaria/

Hmmmm...I'm not sure about all of this. I'd like to see a U.S. Food and Drug Admin. study on this.



What he had to say was interesting, but he is not a medical doctor nor a scientist.
07-31-2013, 11:47 PM #12
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,773 Threads:136 Joined:Apr 2013
(07-31-2013, 10:53 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2013/05/fake-...s-malaria/

Hmmmm...I'm not sure about all of this. I'd like to see a U.S. Food and Drug Admin. study on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02kvmmDLw7c

What he had to say was interesting, but he is not a medical doctor nor a scientist.


Actually the FDA never does a study on any product. The studies are done and paid for by the company wanting to get the approval.

These days it costs upwards of $300- to $500-million dollars to complete all the FDA hurdles.

Since MMS is not a patented product, there is no company that would be willing to spend the money.

Also, FDA approval is not needed in African countries. FDA approval is for authorization in the US.

When 154 malaria patients out of 154 are able to be free of the malaria parasite while 1.2 millio die from malaria, that's good enough for me.

Meanwhile, the FDA is notorious for approving drugs that have killed millions of people, so their approval doesn't mean a damn thing regarding either effectiveness or safety.

Pray for me. hug.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-01-2013, 06:56 AM #13
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-31-2013, 10:53 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2013/05/fake-...s-malaria/

Hmmmm...I'm not sure about all of this. I'd like to see a U.S. Food and Drug Admin. study on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02kvmmDLw7c

What he had to say was interesting, but he is not a medical doctor nor a scientist.


Ummm... you must have missed the link I provided to the FDA?
08-01-2013, 04:42 PM #14
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,881 Threads:420 Joined:Jun 2012
(08-01-2013, 06:56 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-31-2013, 10:53 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2013/05/fake-...s-malaria/

Hmmmm...I'm not sure about all of this. I'd like to see a U.S. Food and Drug Admin. study on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02kvmmDLw7c

What he had to say was interesting, but he is not a medical doctor nor a scientist.


Ummm... you must have missed the link I provided to the FDA?


I don't consider a safety alert to be an in-depth study, I want to review studies so that I can make my own determination. As for the only one? study done with this concoction in Africa, how do we know all 154 people actually had the malaria virus? It's all too sketchy for me.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
08-01-2013, 05:08 PM #15
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(08-01-2013, 04:42 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(08-01-2013, 06:56 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-31-2013, 10:53 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2013/05/fake-...s-malaria/

Hmmmm...I'm not sure about all of this. I'd like to see a U.S. Food and Drug Admin. study on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02kvmmDLw7c

What he had to say was interesting, but he is not a medical doctor nor a scientist.


Ummm... you must have missed the link I provided to the FDA?


I don't consider a safety alert to be an in-depth study, I want to review studies so that I can make my own determination. As for the only one? study done with this concoction in Africa, how do we know all 154 people actually had the malaria virus? It's all too sketchy for me.


The FDA isn't about to conduct a "safety study" on something they have already determined is toxic enough to issue a warning alert for.

Either you consider the two video docs about it as they present it or you consider it a hoax.

...I don't think it's a hoax and I think part of the "toxicity" is how this stuff works to cure.

It sounds like it is dangerous stuff if not taken properly and mishandled. Many poisons are know to have benefits when taken in small doses.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com