#Login Register


  • 7 Vote(s) - 3 Average
Home 


"GOD" is a PLANET
07-04-2013, 03:33 PM #31
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(07-04-2013, 03:28 PM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  I sometimes think the Earth is God?

A higher conscious being existing beyond our comprehension in another dimension?

All living things are the telekinetic constructions within this beings mind that we perceive as the space and objects around us?

The Earth is God who exists within us and all around us and resides somewhere beyond our perceptions?

God is telepathically connected to everyone and everything?

The material world around us is the three dimensional holographic projections of this beings thoughts and desires?


iagree.gif
07-04-2013, 03:38 PM #32
Wicked Oblivion Member
Posts:10,778 Threads:720 Joined:Oct 2012
(07-04-2013, 03:33 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(07-04-2013, 03:28 PM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  I sometimes think the Earth is God?

A higher conscious being existing beyond our comprehension in another dimension?

All living things are the telekinetic constructions within this beings mind that we perceive as the space and objects around us?

The Earth is God who exists within us and all around us and resides somewhere beyond our perceptions?

God is telepathically connected to everyone and everything?

The material world around us is the three dimensional holographic projections of this beings thoughts and desires?


iagree.gif

Mind blowing thoughts and ideas to say the least...
07-04-2013, 04:01 PM #33
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
just common sense, really..
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 06:10 PM #34
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
it is the TERM "God" that we as imperfect humans have mistranslated

it can mean
a) supreme creator
b) angelic type being (Baal, Marduk, Molech, etc etc)
c) celestial body
every planet in our solar system is named after what?
A GOD[/i]
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 06:11 PM #35
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
sorry about the rude comments posted before to the other guy
I HATE trolls
07-04-2013, 06:46 PM #36
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,286 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Your point of Gods being planets, and vice versa is quite valid. cheers.gif

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 07:13 PM #37
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-04-2013, 06:11 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  sorry about the rude comments posted before to the other guy
I HATE trolls


never mind. you both were hilarious.
just answer the questions that were asked in this thread so we can keep this thread alive.
07-04-2013, 07:20 PM #38
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,618 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Oh I don't know that the bible would contain any truths about the nature of God. If God is everything that should include planets as well. It's not that far fetched that people in ye olde days would give heavenly bodies divine attributes.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 08:38 PM #39
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Psalm 19:6
His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.

Job 22:14
Thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit of heaven.


Malachi 4:2

King James Version (KJV)


2 But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.



malachi 4:2 a SUN with WINGS
sounds familiar?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 08:40 PM #40
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-04-2013, 08:38 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Psalm 19:6
His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.

Job 22:14
Thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit of heaven.


Malachi 4:2

King James Version (KJV)


2 But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.



malachi 4:2 a SUN with WINGS
sounds familiar?

"circuit" = ORBIT
"heaven" = SPACE
"GOD" = PLANET in these listed verses.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 08:54 PM #41
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
I believe it is a reference to NIBIRU
I believe "angles" are its inhabitants.
07-04-2013, 09:13 PM #42
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,286 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Angles? Quick call Euclid and have him bring Isosceles & Pythagoras. chuckle.gif I assume you meant angels?
Here's the deal for me, from my perspective NIBIRU does not exist. In fact, it's never even mentioned.
I could mention a load of pseudo-scholars that support this blatantly wrong theory.
sitchiniswrong.com

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 09:17 PM #43
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-04-2013, 09:13 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Angles? Quick call Euclid and have him bring Isosceles & Pythagoras. chuckle.gif I assume you meant angels?
Here's the deal for me, from my perspective NIBIRU does not exist. In fact, it's never even mentioned.
I could mention a load of pseudo-scholars that support this blatantly wrong theory.
sitchiniswrong.com

typo


and the sitchinis wrong website is laughable at best
the video shows a guy rambling on and on about NOTHING
I doubt he even READ Sitchins works
here look at THIS website
it shows the Sumerian artifacts from whence the story originated
no ties to Sitchin...
and notice the logo in the top right corner
http://xfacts.com/ancient/
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 09:22 PM #44
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(07-04-2013, 09:17 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(07-04-2013, 09:13 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Angles? Quick call Euclid and have him bring Isosceles & Pythagoras. chuckle.gif I assume you meant angels?
Here's the deal for me, from my perspective NIBIRU does not exist. In fact, it's never even mentioned.
I could mention a load of pseudo-scholars that support this blatantly wrong theory.
sitchiniswrong.com

typo


and the sitchinis wrong website is laughable at best
the video shows a guy rambling on and on about NOTHING
I doubt he even READ Sitchins works
here look at THIS website
it shows the Sumerian artifacts from whence the story originated
no ties to Sitchin...
and notice the logo in the top right corner
http://xfacts.com/ancient/

and space.com recently did many stories on the celestial mechanics of certain EXOPLANETS
they conduct electricity...
they retain heat.....
they have highly elliptical orbits that carry them close to their parent stars, then they are ejected back out into deep space.
Three things verify the account......
the bible
science
and our history

there is a missing planet right inbetween Mars and Jupiter.
Space.com says our earth and moon were created through a collision between the previous planet (protoearth) and an incoming celestial body
In space everything works in cycles
therefore whatever came through before
will eventually return
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 09:33 PM #45
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
from the "sitchiniswrong.com website
this shows the guy who made this website is full of shït
The "Alien" Elongated Skulls

I've blogged about these skulls over at PaleoBabble. The picture on the site is a facsimile of the elongated skulls you'll see promoted on ancient astronaut sites -- but the one I use comes from a medical supply company. That alone should tell you something. Yes,. Virginia, real scientists are aware of these skulls and don't think they are anything alien at all. For the company's website and a couple scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals about those "alien" alongated Peruvian skulls. click here to go to my post.

Related links on my PaleoBabble blog:

Alien Fetuses in King Tut's Tomb? Nope


Did aliens build Machu Picchu? Nope


Does Akhenaten's unusual physique prove he had alien DNA? Nope


Did the Egyptians need aliens or alien technology to build the pyramids? Nope and Nope


UFOs in Medieval and Renaissance Art?

I'm not an art historian, but Diego Cuoghi is. He's taken a careful and lengthy look at the artwork promoted by Matthew Hurley and others to promote the idea that a range of artists were putting flying saucers in their works. Nope.


NO evidence of any kind.
Just him saying "nope" to alternative theories
This guy is a complete MORON.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com