Quote:The political outlook of Oslo terror suspect Anders Behring Breivik was revealed yesterday in his 1,500 page manifesto. Breivik ranted about multiculturalism and expressed anti-islamic views in light of a growing immigrant population in Norway. While this attack displays hallmarks of a staged event, it opens up a wider picture of advancing globalization and the global architects anticipation of true violent resistance.
Globalization and trends to world governance have become regular headlines throughout the world. As these trends continue, resistance to losses of sovereignty and globalization are increasing. This is coming as little surprise to the social planners who have foreseen the rise of world government, and actively participated in its formation.
Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted in his book, Between Two Ages: Americaâ€™s Role in the Technetronic Era, that the formation of the world system would require â€œsacrificesâ€ on part of Americans that will harm Americaâ€™s favorable position in the world. Brzezinski states,
â€œThe nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereigntyâ€¦ In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.â€
As America stands on the brink of default, the United States position in the world power structure is falling dramatically. $16 trillion has been looted from the country to secretly bail out foreign banks.
The United Kingdomâ€™s Ministry of Defense stated in 2007 that â€œâ€¦growing urban under-classes are likely to pose an increasing threat to social order and stability, as the burden of acquired debt and the failure of pension provision begins to bite.â€
James P. Muldoon, Jr., Senior Fellow of the Center for Global Change and Governance at Rutgers University, writes in The Architecture of Global Governance that the transition to the international system will emerge out of â€˜chaosâ€™,
â€œFor some, the disarray of traditional relationships in international affairs indicates a dangerous deterioration of the international order and portends collapse of the system into chaos or anarchyâ€¦ an inevitable consequence of the transformation of the international system into a global system. In some respects, both are right. The international order has indeed deteriorated into â€˜disorderâ€™ in large measure, but there is growing evidence that a global system is emerging out of this â€˜chaos.â€™â€
What better way to frame a debate than to demonize your opponent?...
Where Brzezinski, mentions "the formation of the world system would require â€œsacrificesâ€ on part of Americans" I would like to widen that statement which includes all people with a 'western standard of living for the past 40 years. Which has been in decline for decades.
Since the "death" of Bin Laden, TPTB needs a new bogey man, so that anyone who opposes EU integration', and more Federal Power in the states can be tarred with the brush of 'right wing terrorism' sympathies and thus be excluded from the' democratic process'.
It has always been the motto "order through chaos"