#Login Register

  • 9 Vote(s) - 3.11 Average

Good Luck With That!
11-08-2012, 03:13 AM #1
Upāsaka Member
Posts:1,230 Threads:252 Joined:Feb 2011

Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips http://marketdailynews.com/2012/11/07/se...6uOQ56H.99

It would essentially ban thousands of firearms and require gun owners to turn them over to the Federal government.

Quote: I don’t have the minutes of the meeting (yet), but sources tell me California Senator and longtime gun-hater Dianne Feinstein’s legal staff held meetings on Friday with FTB/ATF legal staff to discuss a new “Assault Weapons Ban” Madame Feinstein would be looking to push through Congress if President Obama wins reelection.

This same “pretty good intelligence” says the items that would lead to a banwould ban pistol grips and “high-capacity” magazines, eliminate any grandfathering and ban sales of “weapons in possession”.

I don’t know about you, but if these things come to pass and I’m “in possession” I’m certainly not selling.

In fact, the lack of interest in the idea surprised the California liberal’s legal stafferslol.gif (you think). Apparently, they believe no logical person could possible disagree with them.

I began receiving the first reports of increases in gun buying by people concerned about tomorrow’s election. Dealers in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama and Indiana all tell me there hasn’t been a huge number of buyers expressing those concerns, but the numbers were noticeable.

Among that group -and the majority of “regular” purchasers- the core driving most of the purchasing seem to be in their mid-to-late 30s. Again, home and personal defense are the most frequently cited reasons for buying.

Source: http://www.shootingwire.com/

11-08-2012, 03:21 AM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:40,726 Threads:1,523 Joined:Feb 2011
lol.gif Interesting to see how that goes. pop2.gif

Time to hit the meme generator. chuckle.gif

11-08-2012, 03:23 AM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,190 Threads:1,473 Joined:Feb 2011
Here it comes... İmage

11-08-2012, 03:32 AM #4
Upāsaka Member
Posts:1,230 Threads:252 Joined:Feb 2011
Octo Why did you have to go and post a thing like that!?!, made me wince at the link.

But since were on topic of crazy republican women,Minnesota decided to reelect Michele Bachmann. Seriously Minnesota, those who voted for her full of derp



11-08-2012, 03:48 AM #5
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,190 Threads:1,473 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif No more Ambien for Brokaw in the daytime.

11-08-2012, 05:50 AM #6
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,175 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(11-08-2012, 03:32 AM)Prometheus Wrote:  Octo Why did you have to go and post a thing like that!?!, made me wince at the link.

But since were on topic of crazy republican women,Minnesota decided to reelect Michele Bachmann. Seriously Minnesota, those who voted for her full of derp


Huh? Feinstein is a combination of the worst of traits in public officials: idiot and democrat. At least Bachmann isn't a democrat.

What is it with the California delegation??? Boxer is in the running for dumbest Senator every year and then there is Rep. Pete Stark, Nancy Pelosi, Henry Waxman, Maxine Waters, "sigh". Fortunately Jerry Brown is a shot in the foot that just hurts Californians.

They must give a common sense test to California Democrats and only let the failures run for office.

I have to concede that it is the antigun attitude that I really resent. I'm pretty proficient with a 45 auto, a 22 rifle, or a 12 gauge. Don't understand why someone would want to take weapons away. Large capacity magazines are a real help for target practice and if you get into a fire fight - having to change magazines is not good. Full auto weapons already require special licensing. Anyone with a room temperature or better IQ knows that what is being banned is not full auto, and therefore is not an assault weapon. They are banning guns based on appearance. We should not elect infantile representatives and senators like this.

The right to have weapons is the right to be free.

11-08-2012, 06:19 PM #7
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,706 Threads:78 Joined:Feb 2011


11-08-2012, 06:21 PM #8
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:14,728 Threads:439 Joined:Jun 2012
Looks like Dianne's not the only leader in the war against guns.

11-08-2012, 06:25 PM #9
Shadow Incognito Anonymous
11-08-2012, 08:23 PM #10
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,175 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(11-08-2012, 06:21 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Looks like Dianne's not the only leader in the war against guns.


Mikey is his own case. He was a democrat who became a Republican (because the Republican mayoral primary is pitiful) to run as a moderate against a liberal democrat (a moderate couldn't win the democratic primary). He is currently an independent who stomped on term limits to get reelected. Not really an antigun Republican.

Richard Lugar and James Brady are better examples of antigun Republicans. Indiana sacrificed a safe seat to get Lugar out of office partially or mostly for his antigun views.

Bill O'reilly who may or may not be Republican is surprisingly soft on guns.

As to the cartoons about banning guns in public places. Gun bans are a bad idea. A gun ban effectively puts a target on everyone in the facility.
11-08-2012, 11:53 PM #11
yankees skier
Posts:5,093 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011

11-09-2012, 07:45 AM #12
Tacolover II Member
Posts:381 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-08-2012, 06:25 PM)Shadow Wrote:  İmage

Exactly, I have my CHL and proudly pack my Colt 1911 .45acp
11-09-2012, 08:58 AM #13
ocker1 Member
Posts:2,184 Threads:879 Joined:Mar 2011
them Gun Laws are stupid , all guns should be banned
In NZ we dont have guns and we dont have school massacres

that ridiculous cartoon !!
hey tell me how many people actualy shot back at the lunatic ??

NONE ----Thats how many !!!
11-09-2012, 10:12 AM #14
Tacolover II Member
Posts:381 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
Ocker the thought on those cartoons is the people took in guns that guns are not allowed so no law abiding citizen can shoot back at them.

I've used guns for hunting since I was like 8 years old, several of us carried shotguns in our cars to go bird hunting after school. There was no big deal about it as long as you kept them out of sight. I enjoy hunting

Now I travel a lot into industrialized neighborhoods late night sometimes and considered very unsafe with gang activity. Criminals carry guns whether legal or not.

However I used to guide on a ranch close to the Mexican border, the "coyotes" that bring in the illegals can be very dangerous. But I have witnessed individuals that pick up a firearm and their demeanor changes like that of a crazed fanatic. Some people just should not have a gun. I like shooting them for sport and hunting. Being proficient in case I have to use 1-in self defense. I have never pulled or pointed a gun at any person thank God and hope I never will.

I'll probably go to the range early next week.
11-09-2012, 11:36 AM #15
ocker1 Member
Posts:2,184 Threads:879 Joined:Mar 2011
CRIKEY !!!! ya missed the point completely !!

Lots of people in USA carry guns yet no one shot back at the one doing the killings WHY ?



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com