Quote:A top Harvard constitutional law professor is calling for an impeachment investigation into Donald Trump for obstruction of justice, branding the president’s firing of FBI Director James Comey as an “obvious effort to interfere with a probe involving national security.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/laur...mg00000009

It never ceases.

1. Harvard
2. Huffington Post

Neither mean a thing.

(05-14-2017, 03:44 PM)Mars Wrote:  1. Harvard
2. Huffington Post

Neither mean a thing.

This

All this finger pointing is going to backfire in a major way.
With zero proof of any involvement in some Russian collusion scheme all this is meaningless.
This is the biggest lie the media and Democrats have ever concocted - Wikileaks released proof Podesta made this scenario up to save face about Hillery's loss.
All the butt hurt and lies they can dream up won't win elections.

(05-14-2017, 03:36 PM)The Black Friar Wrote:  

Quote:A top Harvard constitutional law professor is calling for an impeachment investigation into Donald Trump for obstruction of justice, branding the president’s firing of FBI Director James Comey as an “obvious effort to interfere with a probe involving national security.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/laur...mg00000009

It never ceases.

So in doing some research, I found this little nugget:
Under the law, Comey is required to immediately inform the Department of Justice of any attempt to obstruct justice by any person, even the President of the United States. Failure to do so would result in criminal charges against Comey. (18 USC 4 and 28 USC 1361) He would also, upon sufficient proof, lose his license to practice law.
So, if Comey testifies that Trump ordered him to stop, and he failed to report, he's up shit creek without a paddle. I have a feeling that the people who pushed this matter are not familiar with actual law. Time will tell I guess.

(05-19-2017, 08:47 AM)Ninelives Wrote:  

(05-14-2017, 03:36 PM)The Black Friar Wrote:  

Quote:A top Harvard constitutional law professor is calling for an impeachment investigation into Donald Trump for obstruction of justice, branding the president’s firing of FBI Director James Comey as an “obvious effort to interfere with a probe involving national security.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/laur...mg00000009

It never ceases.

So in doing some research, I found this little nugget:
Under the law, Comey is required to immediately inform the Department of Justice of any attempt to obstruct justice by any person, even the President of the United States. Failure to do so would result in criminal charges against Comey. (18 USC 4 and 28 USC 1361) He would also, upon sufficient proof, lose his license to practice law.
So, if Comey testifies that Trump ordered him to stop, and he failed to report, he's up shït creek without a paddle. I have a feeling that the people who pushed this matter are not familiar with actual law. Time will tell I guess.

Right o' Ninelives. That puts him in a pretty delicate position. This is all going to collapse on the Democrats and the media IMHO. They will be eating crow and wearing egg on their faces for years to come after this hoax.

(05-19-2017, 08:06 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  

(05-14-2017, 03:44 PM)Mars Wrote:  1. Harvard
2. Huffington Post

Neither mean a thing.

This

What he said.

Shit...

I presumed your gender...

What ze... zim... zzztttt...

fuck...

What that poster said.