#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Here's Come The Science .... or NOT.
09-28-2011, 01:27 AM #1
Upāsaka Member
Posts:1,383 Threads:252 Joined:Feb 2011
Reuters By Gerard Wynn - Analysis

Extreme steps needed to meet climate target


Quote:(Reuters) - New research, to be published in the journal Climatic Change in November, suggests humankind may have to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere on a vast scale if emissions keep rising after 2020.

The series of articles provide scenarios which will form the basis of the next report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2013 and 2014.

At present emissions levels, in less than 20 years the sky would effectively be full, meaning every extra tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted would have to be removed to stay within safer climate limits, one lead author says
...(read more of this nonsense) http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/2...IK20110920

Love it how the msm come up with the arbitrary deadlines of 2020. Has absolutely nothing to do with Agenda 21, nope not a thing.13.gif

This commenter makes a great counter argument JDoddsGW
Quote: wrote:
You must be kidding.
That other greenhouse gas water vapor goes up to 100% humidity, and there is absolutely no change in the temperature BECAUSE the amount of incoming energy photons is what limits the greenhouse effect. Now just why doesn’t the number of photons ALSO limit the greenhouse effect for CO2. In fact if you look at the 1896 Arrhenius paper which identified that “more GHG CO2 means more warming” you will find that Mother Nature contradicts that CO2 finding every single night, when she reduces the energy coming in, & thus releases more CO2 and water vapor to be available for more greenhouse effect warming BUT the temperature GOES DOWN. Mother Nature shows that the Arrhenius/IPCC conclusion that more GHGs means more warming is just plain WRONG. The Arrhenius conclusion is a fraud. And since the entire IPCC model analysis depends on more GHGs meaning more warming then the entire IPCC analysis is a fraud. AS PROVEN DAILY by Mother Nature.
Common Sense dictates that the change in the amount of incoming energy is what changes the temperature, NOT the amount of GHGs or CO2. which may or may not be involved in a greenhouse effect photon absorption and almost immediate release. The availability of more GHG Water Vapor does NOT dictate that more greenhouse effect warming will occur. YOu have to get the energy from somewhere since Man is not yet capable of creating more energy. The idea that more CO2 guarantees more warming is so downright stupid it defies reality AND these Journals & reporters keep insisting on writing that it does.
If you want another explanation of climate change or warming see the Paper “Gravity causes Climate Change” in http://www.scribd.com where it is shown that the change in distance of the Earth from the Sun Moon and Planets results in a change in the force and energy felt (mostly as angular momentum and friction on Earth It is the same as the change in the distance to the moon causes tides and tidal energy. Apparently the IPCC does not believe that, because they ignore all gravity effects in determinng the amount of incoming energy and think it all comes from sunlight. Can”t even do basic science properly.
09-28-2011, 01:39 AM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,983 Threads:1,473 Joined:Feb 2011
(09-28-2011, 01:27 AM)Prometheus Wrote:  
Quote:(Reuters) - New research, to be published in the journal Climatic Change in November, suggests humankind may have to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere on a vast scale if emissions keep rising after 2020.

At present emissions levels, in less than 20 years the sky would effectively be full, meaning every extra tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted would have to be removed to stay within safer climate limits, one lead author says


They're ğkkin batshit mad scientists blink.gifgaah.gif

09-28-2011, 01:45 AM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,393 Threads:1,439 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:Mother Nature shows that the Arrhenius/IPCC conclusion that more GHGs means more warming is just plain WRONG. The Arrhenius conclusion is a fraud. And since the entire IPCC model analysis depends on more GHGs meaning more warming then the entire IPCC analysis is a fraud. AS PROVEN DAILY by Mother Nature.

clap.gif These alarmists with their pseudo science want to tax us all and create a global energy police that can enter without warrant to find violations. The smart meters are all part of that agenda.
Thank god real science and China have proven them to be charlatans.

wonder.gif
09-28-2011, 04:24 AM #4
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,782 Threads:647 Joined:Feb 2011
[quote='Prometheus' pid='20974' dateline='1317162442']

[quote](Reuters) - New research, to be published in the journal Climatic Change in November, suggests humankind may have to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere on a vast scale if emissions keep rising after 2020.

At present emissions levels, in less than 20 years the sky would effectively be full, meaning every extra tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted would have to be removed to stay within safer climate limits, one lead author says[/quote]

How many dates have they set so far? According to experts, we should have already run out of oil, eaten every fish in the ocean, died from global warming and various other doomy things.

13.gif

Experts sure are stupid...


.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
09-28-2011, 01:28 PM #5
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,393 Threads:1,439 Joined:Feb 2011
All the real experts have gone extinct. chuckle.gif

wonder.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com