Extreme steps needed to meet climate target
Quote:(Reuters) - New research, to be published in the journal Climatic Change in November, suggests humankind may have to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere on a vast scale if emissions keep rising after 2020....(read more of this nonsense) http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/2...IK20110920
The series of articles provide scenarios which will form the basis of the next report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2013 and 2014.
At present emissions levels, in less than 20 years the sky would effectively be full, meaning every extra tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted would have to be removed to stay within safer climate limits, one lead author says
Love it how the msm come up with the arbitrary deadlines of 2020. Has absolutely nothing to do with Agenda 21, nope not a thing.
This commenter makes a great counter argument JDoddsGW
You must be kidding.
That other greenhouse gas water vapor goes up to 100% humidity, and there is absolutely no change in the temperature BECAUSE the amount of incoming energy photons is what limits the greenhouse effect. Now just why doesnâ€™t the number of photons ALSO limit the greenhouse effect for CO2. In fact if you look at the 1896 Arrhenius paper which identified that â€œmore GHG CO2 means more warmingâ€ you will find that Mother Nature contradicts that CO2 finding every single night, when she reduces the energy coming in, & thus releases more CO2 and water vapor to be available for more greenhouse effect warming BUT the temperature GOES DOWN. Mother Nature shows that the Arrhenius/IPCC conclusion that more GHGs means more warming is just plain WRONG. The Arrhenius conclusion is a fraud. And since the entire IPCC model analysis depends on more GHGs meaning more warming then the entire IPCC analysis is a fraud. AS PROVEN DAILY by Mother Nature.
Common Sense dictates that the change in the amount of incoming energy is what changes the temperature, NOT the amount of GHGs or CO2. which may or may not be involved in a greenhouse effect photon absorption and almost immediate release. The availability of more GHG Water Vapor does NOT dictate that more greenhouse effect warming will occur. YOu have to get the energy from somewhere since Man is not yet capable of creating more energy. The idea that more CO2 guarantees more warming is so downright stupid it defies reality AND these Journals & reporters keep insisting on writing that it does.
If you want another explanation of climate change or warming see the Paper â€œGravity causes Climate Changeâ€ in http://www.scribd.com where it is shown that the change in distance of the Earth from the Sun Moon and Planets results in a change in the force and energy felt (mostly as angular momentum and friction on Earth It is the same as the change in the distance to the moon causes tides and tidal energy. Apparently the IPCC does not believe that, because they ignore all gravity effects in determinng the amount of incoming energy and think it all comes from sunlight. Canâ€t even do basic science properly.