#Login Register


  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


How scary is this
01-14-2015, 08:03 PM #1
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
The candidates lining up for the 2016 presidential election, are, so far.
Pataki, Christie, Bush, Romney.
Clinton is still out on the tiles.
How scary is it, that Romney is the best one of the bunch so far.
This election is going to be the biggest farce yet.

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 08:05 PM #2
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,775 Threads:1,181 Joined:Feb 2011
Relax. If voting made a difference it would be illegal.
01-14-2015, 09:19 PM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,585 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
lol.gif True dat Shadow.
However, there is Dr. Ben Carson and Rand Paul as well. I'm telling ya' I'd take Hillary any day over any of the so called GOP front runners. Elizabeth Warren makes a lot of sense to me as well, but she emphatically states she's not running.

wonder.gif
01-14-2015, 09:39 PM #4
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
Yeah. Hillary, if she runs.

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 09:41 PM #5
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-14-2015, 08:05 PM)Shadow Wrote:  Relax. If voting made a difference it would be illegal.

I never vote anymore. Why bother, it's the choices that are blood curdling. Another Bush. The one that rigged his brothers second election no less.
Christie is disgusting. Pataki... Oyyy.... And Romney. Omg

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 09:44 PM #6
misterbumps Member
Posts:1,051 Threads:38 Joined:Apr 2012
Guys how do you think we feel. This year we get to choose from Cameron, Clegg, Milliband or Farage....If Cameron wins I'm so out of this country.

I can see by your coat my friend you're from the other side. Just one thing I got to know. Who won?
01-14-2015, 09:44 PM #7
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-14-2015, 09:19 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  lol.gif True dat Shadow.
However, there is Dr. Ben Carson and Rand Paul as well. I'm telling ya' I'd take Hillary any day over any of the so called GOP front runners. Elizabeth Warren makes a lot of sense to me as well, but she emphatically states she's not running.

I wish bernie Sanders would run. They would probably assassinate him though.
Rand Paul is scary too

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 10:11 PM #8
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,585 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
Both Carson and Paul are physicians and may be the best option to fix what's not functioning at the level it should... namely healthcare.

wonder.gif
01-14-2015, 10:57 PM #9
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-14-2015, 10:11 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Both Carson and Paul are physicians and may be the best option to fix what's not functioning at the level it should... namely healthcare.

I much preferred his dad. Ron Paul. Rand has some odd ideas. They completely ignored Ron Paul last time round, despite the fact he actually won most of the debates

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 10:59 PM #10
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-14-2015, 09:44 PM)misterbumps Wrote:  Guys how do you think we feel. This year we get to choose from Cameron, Clegg, Milliband or Farage....If Cameron wins I'm so out of this country.

They're still not as corrupt as any USA choice.
I'm still sorry I didn't move to Japan way back when

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 11:34 PM #11
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,585 Threads:1,443 Joined:Feb 2011
(01-14-2015, 10:57 PM)Screaming Yellow Zonkers Wrote:  
(01-14-2015, 10:11 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Both Carson and Paul are physicians and may be the best option to fix what's not functioning at the level it should... namely healthcare.

I much preferred his dad. Ron Paul. Rand has some odd ideas. They completely ignored Ron Paul last time round, despite the fact he actually won most of the debates

We'll see how he pans out against the rest of the pack, but I feel he's pretty solid in terms of what's important to voters. I think pretty much same for Dr. Ben Carson as well, but they are the only two potential GOP candidates that do anything for me at all.
Huckabee, Christie and Santorum should just gtfo now. Not a snowballs chance in hell do they have, so why bother?
Now I hear Mitt may be back in the picture as well.
Like Jeb, they are both admirable businessmen, but they haven't quite come to terms with the fact that the GOP base has shifted to that of a more conservative and Libertarian flavor, and isn't so interested in maintaining the status quo anymore.
Where was the base the last time they ran Mitt?
The GOP's gonna' have to take a reality pill, and run a candidate that can actually win, as opposed to the another thud at the polls.

wonder.gif
01-14-2015, 11:37 PM #12
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
(01-14-2015, 11:34 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  
(01-14-2015, 10:57 PM)Screaming Yellow Zonkers Wrote:  
(01-14-2015, 10:11 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Both Carson and Paul are physicians and may be the best option to fix what's not functioning at the level it should... namely healthcare.

I much preferred his dad. Ron Paul. Rand has some odd ideas. They completely ignored Ron Paul last time round, despite the fact he actually won most of the debates

We'll see how he pans out against the rest of the pack, but I feel he's pretty solid in terms of what's important to voters. I think pretty much same for Dr. Ben Carson as well, but they are the only two potential GOP candidates that do anything for me at all.
Huckabee, Christie and Santorum should just gtfo now. Not a snowballs chance in hell do they have, so why bother?
Now I hear Mitt may be back in the picture as well.
Like Jeb, they are both admirable businessmen, but they haven't quite come to terms with the fact that the GOP base has shifted to that of a more conservative and Libertarian flavor, and isn't so interested in maintaining the status quo anymore.
Where was the base the last time they ran Mitt?
The GOP's gonna' have to take a reality pill, and run a candidate that can actually win, as opposed to the another thud at the polls.


Ohhhh Christie thinks he will win. Frigging mark Zuckerberg is endorsing him, and will donate a crap load to his campaign

aaah2.gif
01-14-2015, 11:51 PM #13
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:9,036 Threads:74 Joined:Feb 2011
I haven't voted since a very liberty-minded friend ran for the locals a few years ago.

Before that, not since the 80's.


I don't know about America...seems the same as over here - the candidates who
make any sort of sense never stand a chance against the POO cronies.

People gonna die at the hands of governments, whoever "presides".
The Great Agenda seems to keep its momentum, any which way.
01-15-2015, 12:09 AM #14
jaydoom i am doom
Posts:290 Threads:57 Joined:Mar 2011
(01-14-2015, 11:51 PM)Accidental Stoner Wrote:  I haven't voted since a very liberty-minded friend ran for the locals a few years ago.

Before that, not since the 80's.


I don't know about America...seems the same as over here - the candidates who
make any sort of sense never stand a chance against the POO cronies.

People gonna die at the hands of governments, whoever "presides".
The Great Agenda seems to keep its momentum, any which way.

well said AS! i never seems to matter whos in" charge" they are all moving in the same direction, its becoming more apparent that the bankers control more than we ever thought possible here in the land of the free. we are slaves to the almighty currency .the canidates who make the most sense and stand up for the peoples rights get black listed by msm ( they did it to ron paul, ralph nader, ross perot, or they make them out to be looneys) i refuse to vote for a system that favors only two parties , it should be about the indivdual running not what party they come from or their religious views....i only vote in local elections , i feel my state is more legitimate than our countrys government .although our local govenment is still about what party your part of .... ( the governors race in fl was a joke had a douche and turd to choose from our third canadate didnt appear until a week or so before election) im only ok with rand paul as a canadate this go around for president , we dont need another bush any one whos looked in to that coorked ass family can see that and we dont need another clinton thats for sure no need for some one who helps cover up for her husbands scandals ( not just lewinsky , but bills caught up in a pedophile scandal .... and her involvement in benghazi) it just seems we cant trust any one the msm supports ....
01-15-2015, 12:26 AM #15
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:9,036 Threads:74 Joined:Feb 2011
yup.gif

I still haven't forgot the absolute barbarism Mrs Clinton showed the world
after Colonel Khadaffi's murder. If they select her as the next leader, I'm
afraid it wil be a sign of the POO planning to escalate brutality worldwide.

A woman would fit the Great Agenda perfectly, though 13.gif

And yeah, the Independence Party is the only one talking about the crucial
stuff over here. But they gain no traction at all. Maybe because they dont
take part in the race and racism bullshit - they are more about self-sufficiency,
what to eat, what to drink, how to stay neutral etc etc. Maybe people find
those things dull or something 13.gif

I think the 'self-sufficiency'-part is like bloody poison to the NWO.
Anybody stressing the need for it has to immediately be made suspect of
"ultra-nationalism", "right wing-extremism" and blah blah.

What to do?

dunno.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com