#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


IAEA Report on Chernobyl
06-24-2011, 04:08 PM #1
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Some 350,000 people involved in the initial clean-up of the plant in 1986-87 received average total body radiation doses of the order of 100 millisieverts (mSv) - a millisievert is a unit of radiation dose equivalent to about 10 general chest x-rays. This dose is about five times the maximum annual dose limit currently permitted for workers in nuclear facilities (20 mSv per year). Average worldwide natural “background” radiation is about 2.4 mSv annually.

The cancer and death rate studies that have been conducted among samples of the recorded liquidators have shown no direct correlation between radiation exposure at Chernobyl and increased cancer or death rates.

http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/features/...tors.shtml

coffeetime.gif They oughta be sued
06-24-2011, 04:14 PM #2
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
Dubiousgaah.gif

Biere.
06-24-2011, 04:18 PM #3
Ghostie Member
Posts:1,074 Threads:212 Joined:Mar 2011
sorry shadow butİmage
06-24-2011, 04:23 PM #4
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
(06-24-2011, 04:18 PM)GhostHunter Wrote:  sorry shadow but

Of course it is. I'd expect this from Ann Coulter or Obama but not the IAEA
06-24-2011, 04:27 PM #5
Ghostie Member
Posts:1,074 Threads:212 Joined:Mar 2011
(06-24-2011, 04:23 PM)Shadow Wrote:  
(06-24-2011, 04:18 PM)GhostHunter Wrote:  sorry shadow but

Of course it is. I'd expect this from Ann Coulter or Obama but not the IAEA
There basically all the same just have different titlescheers.gif
06-24-2011, 04:31 PM #6
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Ain't that the truth sad2.gif
06-24-2011, 05:05 PM #7
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Here's why gaah.gif

the position of the IAEA, set up through the UN in 1957 "to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy," and its 1959 agreement with WHO. There is a "need to change," it says, the IAEA-WHO pact. It has muzzled the WHO, providing for the "hiding" from the "public of any information "unwanted" by the nuclear industry.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c...&aid=20908

06-24-2011, 10:35 PM #8
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,601 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
The UN is a joke! Shadow! is right, but we're not powerful enough to challenge it at this point
06-24-2011, 10:38 PM #9
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,601 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(06-24-2011, 10:35 PM)Octo Wrote:  we're not powerful enough to challenge it at this point

let me clarify...I'm drunk like a sonofabitch lol
06-24-2011, 10:51 PM #10
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
(06-24-2011, 10:38 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(06-24-2011, 10:35 PM)Octo Wrote:  we're not powerful enough to challenge it at this point

let me clarify...I'm drunk like a sonofabitch lol

hi5.gifbeercheer.gif

Not me.... not yet gaah.gif

Biere.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com