(09-25-2018, 04:33 PM)Kreeper Wrote: Just throwing this out there: you two didn't have to click on this thread or read it. That was your choice. No need to be rude because you made what you deem a bad choice.
The funny part of the article is that she has enough followers to be considered and "influencer" and her "followers" think enough of her to follow her, and be influenced by her, but then think staging a photo for them is too much? Seriously?
This article offers great insight into internet sociology. Our digital culture is being shaped by social media. The future is evolving, and I find this post interesting.
If you check the posts of Below Average G, you can find plenty to criticize.
Posts about forgetting cooking ingredients, saying fuck, ect ect. Absolutely without merit and a waste of time.
And he's triggered about a post highlighting narcissism, because he narcissistic enough not to realize what a bore he is.
Everyone, except him, also realizes 5G signals are not powerful enough to cause ionization. His silly theory is an embarrassment. That could be his obsessive narcissism, as well. He calls himself genius when he's actually a rather dim