(36 minutes ago)grav Wrote:  

(7 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  There is no centrifugal force . The Earth rotates at EXACTLY the same speed as the tip of an hour hand on a 24 hour clock . Twice as slow as the hour hand on your kitchen clock .

If that were the case, when we fly on planes at 30,000 feet , we would weigh even lighter again as you have now dramatically increased the size of the arc radius of the Earth .

An Ant walking on the hour hand or the Town Hall clock does not get thrown off when he reaches the tip and that is traveling TWICE as fast as the Earth is . We would only ever notice we are revolving at 1000mph if there was a fixed marker in our skies and attached to space .

Obvious shillogic.
Shameless too, how you blatantly use the word 'speed' instead of rpm's, or rpd's in the case of the globe rotating once per day.

Speed is distance covered in a time period. Your clock ant is speeding along at one foot per hour. A dead ant at the equator is spinning 1000 miles per hour.

Speed is speed is speed. Rim speed velocity is the true language to describe the motion of the outer edge of a spinning object. A fighter jet can fly in a straight line at 1000 mph. Or more. Put an ant on the wing of a jet and see how long before it would be knocked off.

Please don't put the ant inside the jet to make a false comparison. And then please explain how the air must sync speeds with the surface moving under it at over mach 1.

"A fighter jet can fly in a straight line at 1000 mph."

You dopey twit, you proved how brainless you are !
If in fact the "rim speed " of the Earth was actually 1000mph, the Jet , traveling at 1000mph could barely keep up with it and it could land like a Helicopter !!!!!!!!!

https://imgflip.com/i/33d4te

(5 minutes ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  

(42 minutes ago)grav Wrote:  

(7 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  There is no centrifugal force . The Earth rotates at EXACTLY the same speed as the tip of an hour hand on a 24 hour clock . Twice as slow as the hour hand on your kitchen clock .

If that were the case, when we fly on planes at 30,000 feet , we would weigh even lighter again as you have now dramatically increased the size of the arc radius of the Earth .

An Ant walking on the hour hand or the Town Hall clock does not get thrown off when he reaches the tip and that is traveling TWICE as fast as the Earth is . We would only ever notice we are revolving at 1000mph if there was a fixed marker in our skies and attached to space .

Obvious shillogic.
Shameless too, how you blatantly use the word 'speed' instead of rpm's, or rpd's in the case of the globe rotating once per day.

Speed is distance covered in a time period. Your clock ant is speeding along at one foot per hour. A dead ant at the equator is spinning 1000 miles per hour.

Speed is speed is speed. Rim speed velocity is the true language to describe the motion of the outer edge of a spinning object. A fighter jet can fly in a straight line at 1000 mph. Or more. Put an ant on the wing of a jet and see how long before it would be knocked off.

Please don't put the ant inside the jet to make a false comparison. And then please explain how the air must sync speeds with the surface moving under it at over mach 1.

"A fighter jet can fly in a straight line at 1000 mph."

You dopey twit, you proved how brainless you are !
If in fact the "rim speed " of the Earth was actually 1000mph, the Jet , traveling at 1000mph could barely keep up with it and it could land like a Helicopter !!!!!!!!!

https://i.imgflip.com/33d4te.jpg

https://i.imgflip.com/33d4te.jpg

https://i.imgflip.com/33d8c5.jpg

(3 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  

(3 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  

(3 hours ago)grav Wrote:  

(10 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  There is no centrifugal force . The Earth rotates at EXACTLY the same speed as the tip of an hour hand on a 24 hour clock . Twice as slow as the hour hand on your kitchen clock .

If that were the case, when we fly on planes at 30,000 feet , we would weigh even lighter again as you have now dramatically increased the size of the arc radius of the Earth .

An Ant walking on the hour hand or the Town Hall clock does not get thrown off when he reaches the tip and that is traveling TWICE as fast as the Earth is . We would only ever notice we are revolving at 1000mph if there was a fixed marker in our skies and attached to space .

Obvious shillogic.
Shameless too, how you blatantly use the word 'speed' instead of rpm's, or rpd's in the case of the globe rotating once per day.

Speed is distance covered in a time period. Your clock ant is speeding along at one foot per hour. A dead ant at the equator is spinning 1000 miles per hour.

Speed is speed is speed. Rim speed velocity is the true language to describe the motion of the outer edge of a spinning object. A fighter jet can fly in a straight line at 1000 mph. Or more. Put an ant on the wing of a jet and see how long before it would be knocked off.

Please don't put the ant inside the jet to make a false comparison. And then please explain how the air must sync speeds with the surface moving under it at over mach 1.

"A fighter jet can fly in a straight line at 1000 mph."

You dopey twit, you proved how brainless you are !
If in fact the "rim speed " of the Earth was actually 1000mph, the Jet , traveling at 1000mph could barely keep up with it and it could land like a Helicopter !!!!!!!!!

https://i.imgflip.com/33d4te.jpg

https://i.imgflip.com/33d4te.jpg

Aw, gee, AE guy, you are so thoughtful.    Will this be available in tee shirts?

One little question . . . why "the" full grav?
And shouldn't there be a picture of the dopey idea people have about flat earth? like it's a frisbee between Venus and Mars.
The whole world should know by now that we don't believe in the space place as advertised in movies and teevee.

(3 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  https://i.imgflip.com/33d8c5.jpg

 

Another homage por moi?
Merci, AE ami.

Sorry to criticize a free gift, but you don't spell its with an apostrophe, unless you mean 'it is' -- "the" is also unnecessary.

A water drop is free fall, eh? On the International Fake Space Station, eh?

Whenever I embed a new image, it doesn't work. See my next post.

This one shows how accumulated water works in the real world. It seeks its own level.

Ergo, bodies of water are level. Flat. Wind and temperatures will of course stir up ripples or waves. All conditions being still, water will always be flat.
Oceans are level. On a flat earth.

http://www.yourpanama.com/panama-canal.html

Not commonly known is the fact that the two oceans have different sea levels, and different levels of high tide. At the entrance to the Panama Canal, the Pacific Ocean can rise as much as 20 feet, but 45 miles away, the difference between high tide and low in the Atlantic is just three feet.

^ speaking of sea level

.
http://www.atlantanconspiracy.com/2015/0...-ball.html

16) The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct.

.
The sun is supposed to be 93 million miles away. At perihelion, it's a mere 91 million miles.

Got it?
Sooooo. As the sun rises and sets during the day, it should still be 91 to 93 million miles away. Should it increase and decrease in size at that distance?

No -- is the correct answer. yep.
This is very short. You only need to watch the first minute or so.

(8 hours ago)anonymous knitter Wrote:  Not commonly known is the fact that the two oceans have different sea levels, and different levels of high tide. At the entrance to the Panama Canal, the Pacific Ocean can rise as much as 20 feet, but 45 miles away, the difference between high tide and low in the Atlantic is just three feet.

^ speaking of sea level  

Well that wrecks Grav ! IF water ACTUALLY remained level, the water in the Canal would be stationary and stagnate !

(9 hours ago)grav Wrote:  

(Yesterday, 04:20 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  https://i.imgflip.com/33d8c5.jpg

 

Another homage por moi?
Merci, AE ami.

A water drop is free fall, eh?

Yes and he was quick enough to poke a straw into it and form an air bubble as it fell past him !

(4 hours ago)grav Wrote:  .
The sun is supposed to be 93 million miles away. At perihelion, it's a mere 91 million miles.

Got it?
Sooooo. As the sun rises and sets during the day, it should still be 91 to 93 million miles away. Should it increase and decrease in size at that distance?

No -- is the correct answer. yep.
This is very short. You only need to watch the first minute or so.

The correct answer is that the Sun DOES NOT RISE AND SET, we revolve away from it. THAT is why it APPEARS to get smaller, WE get further away from it , depending where we are standing . Standing at one of the Poles, the size of the Sun would not appear to change much throughout the day .

(6 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  

(Yesterday, 07:39 PM)anonymous knitter Wrote:  Not commonly known is the fact that the two oceans have different sea levels, and different levels of high tide. At the entrance to the Panama Canal, the Pacific Ocean can rise as much as 20 feet, but 45 miles away, the difference between high tide and low in the Atlantic is just three feet.

^ speaking of sea level  

Well that wrecks Grav ! IF water ACTUALLY remained level, the water in the Canal would be stationary and stagnate !  

Dynamite the land between the oceans and see what waters do. They join and seek a new sea level.

(6 hours ago)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  

(11 hours ago)grav Wrote:  .
The sun is supposed to be 93 million miles away. At perihelion, it's a mere 91 million miles.

Got it?
Sooooo. As the sun rises and sets during the day, it should still be 91 to 93 million miles away. Should it increase and decrease in size at that distance?

No -- is the correct answer. yep.
This is very short. You only need to watch the first minute or so.

The correct answer is that the Sun DOES NOT RISE AND SET, we revolve away from it. THAT is why it APPEARS to get smaller, WE get further away from it , depending where we are standing .  Standing at one of the Poles, the size of the Sun would not appear to change much throughout the day .

oh.
So we rotate and revolve at 90+ million miles away, yet the sun changes its size enormously during the day as it leisurely rolls overhead. That's some mighty big refraction.

And for proof of the sun's distance we have the moon landing hoaxers' word. And they triangulated the distance over a 6 month period. From a moving object. Earth. It's like running with a tape measure next to moving train to find how long it is.