#Login Register


  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
Home 


Is it OK . . .
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-17-2019, 07:27 PM #106
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
you can't even show a plausible CGI of flat earth
06-17-2019, 09:00 PM #107
F.D Incognito
 
(06-17-2019, 03:35 PM)grav Wrote:  FD? Srzly? Are you here pushing your weight around?
Take a spirit level and spin it around over your head while riding a Cyclotron and see  how well your model works.

[Image: dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif?resize=985%2C554]

1. clouds don't move during the 5-hour transit
2. size of the US is wrong -- at 3000 miles wide, it should be 3/8th the diameter of the blue sphere (8000 miles)
3. moon is 2-dimensionally flat and does not rotate clockwise as advertised by Nasa
4. moon travels in a straight line while the EPIC "geostationary" satellite maintained an amazing fixed position
5. earth exhibits a curious pareidolia in the appearance of an angry clown with one eye closed and the other one open and baleful (the dark object off the coast of California)
Overall, a slipshod product, its many glaring peculiarities a test of human discernment.

It’s been a month and you still can’t answer my question. Every time you fail your fantasy falls apart .
06-17-2019, 09:24 PM #108
grav Member
Posts:338 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019


Fake Sun : Solar Sun Simulator finally unmasked Pt 1
youtube.com13:43  1 year ago
Credits: MrMBB333 Also watch :
What we are saying is, that the Solar Sun Simulator is in a helio -synchronous orbit above our atmosphere in front of our dying sun.
06-17-2019, 09:35 PM #109
grav Member
Posts:338 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
You are here.
-->
[Image: hqdefault.jpg]

on the flattened blue marble in the Infinite Plane.
Motionless. No twirling around in a vacuum. No spining at breakneck speed.

Certainly not this fairy tale.

[Image: EveryFrenchLangur-size_restricted.gif]
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-17-2019, 10:16 PM #110
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
Quote:Kritterbox, which is as edgy, cynical, and has as much real ct as LOP. Which is zilch.

At the rate we're going, 2019 looks to be a bummer.

^You've been told several times & places kritterbox isn't a ct site.
^You shouldn't be badmouthing it elsewhere either,grav.

So...gtfo
06-17-2019, 10:46 PM #111
grav Member
Posts:338 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
(06-17-2019, 04:37 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 03:35 PM)grav Wrote:  FD? Srzly? Are you here pushing your weight around?
Take a spirit level and spin it around over your head while riding a Cyclotron and see  how well your model works.

[Image: dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif?resize=985%2C554]

1. clouds don't move during the 5-hour transit
2. size of the US is wrong -- at 3000 miles wide, it should be 3/8th the diameter of the blue sphere (8000 miles)
3. moon is 2-dimensionally flat and does not rotate clockwise as advertised by Nasa
4. moon travels in a straight line while the EPIC "geostationary" satellite maintained an amazing fixed position
5. earth exhibits a curious pareidolia in the appearance of an angry clown with one eye closed and the other one open and baleful (the dark object off the coast of California)
Overall, a slipshod product, its many glaring peculiarities a test of human discernment.

NASA went to great lengths to explain that was a COMPOSITE rendering, made up using multiple STILL shots as an EDUCATIONAL DEMONSTRATION TOOL ! Wasted time it seems !

hug.gif

(06-17-2019, 10:16 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
Quote:Kritterbox, which is as edgy, cynical, and has as much real ct as LOP. Which is zilch.

At the rate we're going, 2019 looks to be a bummer.

^You've been told several times & places  kritterbox isn't a ct site.
^You shouldn't be badmouthing it elsewhere either,grav.

So...gtfo


Hello, my little shadow government shill.

Truth ain't badmouthing. Facebook and groupthink are everywhere. All forums talk about now is Trump and whether Justin Beiber could beat Tom Cruise.
So far, BK is good for me. It allows free speech.
A little ct never hurt any forum.


[Image: th?id=OIP.FN7IQlnLJc4bhyCzPs7P-AHaGy&pid=Api&dpr=2]
06-17-2019, 10:53 PM #112
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:41,507 Threads:1,589 Joined:Feb 2011
(06-17-2019, 10:46 PM)grav Wrote:  So far, BK is good for me. It allows free speech.
A little ct never hurt any forum.

Bakon Klub? I'm a member there, what's your handle?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-17-2019, 11:36 PM #113
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(06-17-2019, 10:46 PM)grav Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 04:37 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 03:35 PM)grav Wrote:  FD? Srzly? Are you here pushing your weight around?
Take a spirit level and spin it around over your head while riding a Cyclotron and see  how well your model works.

[Image: dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif?resize=985%2C554]

1. clouds don't move during the 5-hour transit
2. size of the US is wrong -- at 3000 miles wide, it should be 3/8th the diameter of the blue sphere (8000 miles)
3. moon is 2-dimensionally flat and does not rotate clockwise as advertised by Nasa
4. moon travels in a straight line while the EPIC "geostationary" satellite maintained an amazing fixed position
5. earth exhibits a curious pareidolia in the appearance of an angry clown with one eye closed and the other one open and baleful (the dark object off the coast of California)
Overall, a slipshod product, its many glaring peculiarities a test of human discernment.

NASA went to great lengths to explain that was a COMPOSITE rendering, made up using multiple STILL shots as an EDUCATIONAL DEMONSTRATION TOOL ! Wasted time it seems !

hug.gif

(06-17-2019, 10:16 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
Quote:Kritterbox, which is as edgy, cynical, and has as much real ct as LOP. Which is zilch.

At the rate we're going, 2019 looks to be a bummer.

^You've been told several times & places  kritterbox isn't a ct site.
^You shouldn't be badmouthing it elsewhere either,grav.

So...gtfo


Hello, my little shadow government shill.

Truth ain't badmouthing. Facebook and groupthink are everywhere. All forums talk about now is Trump and whether Justin Beiber could beat Tom Cruise.
So far, BK is good for me. It allows free speech.
A little ct never hurt any forum.


[Image: th?id=OIP.FN7IQlnLJc4bhyCzPs7P-AHaGy&pid=Api&dpr=2]

omg facepalm_panda.gif that's not earth's shadow
this is simply the night side of the moon aka the part not lit by the sun at the time of the photo
did they teach you nothing about the moon phases?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-17-2019, 11:45 PM #114
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
(06-17-2019, 09:35 PM)grav Wrote:  You are here.
-->
[Image: hqdefault.jpg]

on the flattened blue marble in the Infinite Plane.
Motionless. No twirling around in a vacuum. No spining at breakneck speed.

Certainly not this fairy tale.

[Image: EveryFrenchLangur-size_restricted.gif]

I can see the stars, the milky way, sun, moon, planets, galaxies and nebulae with my own eyes
humans have traveled all parts of earth for ages
yet there had never been any report that supports your CGI
06-18-2019, 12:51 AM #115
grav Member
Posts:338 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
(06-17-2019, 10:53 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 10:46 PM)grav Wrote:  So far, BK is good for me. It allows free speech.
A little ct never hurt any forum.

Bakon Klub? I'm a member there, what's your handle?

Um....well. uhh... 13.gif Would you believe dyslexia? How about dizzy spells? Box o'Kritters?
No? My bad.
06-18-2019, 01:12 AM #116
grav Member
Posts:338 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
(06-17-2019, 11:36 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 10:46 PM)grav Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 04:37 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(06-17-2019, 03:35 PM)grav Wrote:  FD? Srzly? Are you here pushing your weight around?
Take a spirit level and spin it around over your head while riding a Cyclotron and see  how well your model works.

[Image: dscovrepicmoontransitfull.gif?resize=985%2C554]

1. clouds don't move during the 5-hour transit
2. size of the US is wrong -- at 3000 miles wide, it should be 3/8th the diameter of the blue sphere (8000 miles)
3. moon is 2-dimensionally flat and does not rotate clockwise as advertised by Nasa
4. moon travels in a straight line while the EPIC "geostationary" satellite maintained an amazing fixed position
5. earth exhibits a curious pareidolia in the appearance of an angry clown with one eye closed and the other one open and baleful (the dark object off the coast of California)
Overall, a slipshod product, its many glaring peculiarities a test of human discernment.

NASA went to great lengths to explain that was a COMPOSITE rendering, made up using multiple STILL shots as an EDUCATIONAL DEMONSTRATION TOOL ! Wasted time it seems !

hug.gif

(06-17-2019, 10:16 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
Quote:Kritterbox, which is as edgy, cynical, and has as much real ct as LOP. Which is zilch.

At the rate we're going, 2019 looks to be a bummer.

^You've been told several times & places  kritterbox isn't a ct site.
^You shouldn't be badmouthing it elsewhere either,grav.

So...gtfo


Hello, my little shadow government shill.

Truth ain't badmouthing. Facebook and groupthink are everywhere. All forums talk about now is Trump and whether Justin Beiber could beat Tom Cruise.
So far, BK is good for me. It allows free speech.
A little ct never hurt any forum.


[Image: th?id=OIP.FN7IQlnLJc4bhyCzPs7P-AHaGy&pid=Api&dpr=2]

omg  facepalm_panda.gif  that's not earth's shadow
this is simply the night side of the moon aka the part not lit by the sun at the time of the photo
did they teach you nothing about the moon phases?

I picked one at random. Not a good one. It lacks the sun's position, which if at night, would be behind the earth.
You are a pretty sharp-eyed shill. I'll let this one slide, though I could spend a few hours finding images to expose the phases problems.

For now I will say that I have noted on many occasions that the wrong portions of the moon are lit vis-a-vis the sun.
Example. A day or two ago I observed the moon illuminated from about 11:00 to 7:00. The sun was on the horizon already. The moon should have seen reflected light from something like 2:00 to 6:00.

This happens all the time. When I point out the illogical light phenomenon to globers, they shrug their shouders and slough it off. This is how the NWO wins. The brainwashed multitudes see what they are told to see.

Then we have selenelions, eclipses of the moon when the sun is fully ascended into the sky.

Time to trot out refraction? which bends light downwards in the atmosphere?
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
06-18-2019, 03:51 AM #117
Anonymous Kritter Incognito
 
Hmmmnmn, comes to a new site, calls everyone there ''government shills'', bad mouths them at other sites, demands respect here ?

I wonder how that will go ?
Below Average Genius Show this Post
06-18-2019, 04:25 AM #118
Below Average Genius Incognito
 
(06-15-2019, 10:28 PM)grav Wrote:  
(06-15-2019, 12:44 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(06-10-2019, 02:23 PM)grav Wrote:  
(06-10-2019, 07:40 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  When I was a child we crossed the pacific Ocean twice going to and from Japan.

As we got closer to our destinations, we could see the port. It was not visible until we got within whatever number of miles it would take to see it. I'm guessing 10 or 20 miles. It's unlikely that the earth has changed its shape too much since then. IOW the world was round then and it's round now.

Don't get lost in the weeds on this. Everyone on the ship saw what I saw if they were on deck. Every other shiips' voyages produces the same result.There are no exceptions unless there is heavy fog or something blocking he vision. Until you can explain this - and you can't without doing double back flips, you'll need to adjust your view on this matter.

Didn't you have binoculars with you?
Professional photographers have captured targets well beyond the alleged curve.
The formula, which I have stated earlier, calls for a drop of 8 inches times miles squared.
The tallest building in Chicago, around 1450 feet if I recall, should be completely hidden by the curve.
8x(50x50) = 21632÷12= 1802.666

I hardly think that spherical trigonometry is going "into the weeds."

[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]

My reply flew right over your head. The entire point is that the horizon of the port became gradually visible with the highest parts being visible first. You don't need a slide rule to grasp this concept, but you do need some willingness not to have your brain so twisted into a pretzel that you are unwilling to see the obvious.

You're like that bearded guy in the video referring to the 15 degree issue. He is unable psychologically to admit he is in error. That famously painful song by the Doobie Brothers comes to mind.

duh. top visible before bottom. Rly?

So what is your point, genius?
Perspective?
Yes, lines of convergence which crunch lower portions of targets at the vanishing point.

So how am I in error? At least I didn't call you a pretzel-brained psycho for telling us a painfully dull anecdote from grand olde voyages to the Orient.

Before excoriating me again with your rapier wit, please study basic laws of optics.
[Image: th?id=OIP.9gGiXqmYu3ESVkyqoYp0uQHaE_&pid=Api&dpr=2]

ALL photos of long distance targets defy the spinning round earth which you so  blithely embrace. Ah, but then you would have to do the math which absolutely defines the drop from sight at 8xd^. You can not argue with math, which in this case deals with real measurements and empirical evidence.

Do yourself a favor and study your heliocentric model before you come here and show your ignorance.

Um, a drawing is a two dimensional representation that has to use tricks to provide a three dimensional feel. Even though we think we see depth in a drawing, all the images are actually on the surface equidistant from where we are standing. Thus any calculations you do from it only take you further away from the truth.

That visual trick doesn't apply to real life in a three dimensional world. In my case, the port really was at a distance - it was not on the surface where I could touch everything I saw with my hands.

Of course you won't understand this because you've gone "beyond the bend in the road" mentally and psychologically.

PS. Please don't try any more of that kind of crap to make your argument in the future.

PPS. You have not answered this tried and true explanation that was true when it was first presented as an explanation and is still true now. Criticizing a basic physical fact based on its age simply because it is an old physical fact that has not changed and will never change is not a valid critique. Your two dimensional argument is also a major mistake on your part.

You cannot refute the simple argument because it is physically correct. Case closed.
06-18-2019, 06:04 AM #119
grav Member
Posts:338 Threads:1 Joined:Jun 2019
[Image: 0.jpg]
P.S., 443 km = 275 miles.
P.P.S. That long distance photo is impossible on a globe that is 8000 miles wide.
NASA shill Show this Post
06-18-2019, 06:34 AM #120
NASA shill Incognito
 
Where is your data on the ELEVATION of the camera and the ELEVATION of the target ?



Home 





Copyright © 2011 - 2020 kritterbox.com