#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


It's getting colder because it's getting warmer
02-01-2018, 06:12 PM #16
Joy Incognito Anonymous
 
Global warming is settled, the debate has been over for some time. Trump pulled out of the Paris climate accord and we are headed for the end.
02-01-2018, 06:15 PM #17
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,882 Threads:1,455 Joined:Feb 2011
I wish I had your level of confidence in anything Joy. coffeetime.gif

wonder.gif
02-01-2018, 06:41 PM #18
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,210 Threads:191 Joined:Apr 2013
(02-01-2018, 06:12 PM)Joy Wrote:  Global warming is settled, the debate has been over for some time. Trump pulled out of the Paris climate accord and we are headed for the end.

Over?? Maybe you need to get out more?

Pray for me. hug.gif
02-01-2018, 08:32 PM #19
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
The why.

Quote:Multiple lines of independent evidence confirm that human activities are the primary cause of the global warming of the past 50 years. The burning of coal, oil, and gas, and clearing of forests have increased the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by more than 40% since the industrial revolution, and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture and other human activities add to the atmospheric burden of heat-trapping gases.

Because human-induced warming is superimposed on a background of natural variations in climate, change is not uniform over time: short-term fluctuations in the long-term upward trend are natural and expected. Nonetheless, global temperatures are still on the rise and are expected to rise further. Climate change will accelerate significantly if global emissions of heat-trapping gases continue to increase.

https://www.globalchange.gov/climate-cha...pening-why
02-01-2018, 11:53 PM #20
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,939 Threads:665 Joined:Feb 2011
http://notrickszone.com/2018/01/01/150-n...B2s1c.dpbs

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
02-02-2018, 12:08 AM #21
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,210 Threads:191 Joined:Apr 2013
(02-01-2018, 08:32 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The why.

Quote:Multiple lines of independent evidence confirm that human activities are the primary cause of the global warming of the past 50 years. The burning of coal, oil, and gas, and clearing of forests have increased the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by more than 40% since the industrial revolution, and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture and other human activities add to the atmospheric burden of heat-trapping gases.

Because human-induced warming is superimposed on a background of natural variations in climate, change is not uniform over time: short-term fluctuations in the long-term upward trend are natural and expected. Nonetheless, global temperatures are still on the rise and are expected to rise further. Climate change will accelerate significantly if global emissions of heat-trapping gases continue to increase.

https://www.globalchange.gov/climate-cha...pening-why

A) the temperature data that's been collected has been corrupted by increasingly putting the measuring devices closer to the sources of hot air.

B) the East Anglia scandal was of such gigantic proportions that the data simply can't be trusted.

C) There have been times in the world's history where the temperatures were significantly warmer than they are now BEFORE the world became so industrialized.

The biggest environmental problem is worldwide deforestation which is a problem that is often due to oppressive governing. The people become so poor that they strip the land. The 'fix' in those cases is to change the government, not to make rules that further oppress the people who are sometimes starving.

Pray for me. hug.gif
02-02-2018, 12:41 AM #22
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-01-2018, 11:53 PM)Kreeper Wrote:  http://notrickszone.com/2018/01/01/150-n...B2s1c.dpbs

From the comments at the bottom:

Quote:Kenneth Richard 5. January 2018 at 12:38 AM | Permalink

The warming is not global, but regional. Some regions are cooling, some are warming, but overall there is nothing unusual about modern climate relative to the Holocene context. That’s why it’s “NON-global warming” instead of global non-warming…because the latter would imply it is not warming anywhere on the globe…and that’s not true either.
02-02-2018, 12:43 AM #23
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-02-2018, 12:08 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-01-2018, 08:32 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  The why.

Quote:Multiple lines of independent evidence confirm that human activities are the primary cause of the global warming of the past 50 years. The burning of coal, oil, and gas, and clearing of forests have increased the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by more than 40% since the industrial revolution, and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture and other human activities add to the atmospheric burden of heat-trapping gases.

Because human-induced warming is superimposed on a background of natural variations in climate, change is not uniform over time: short-term fluctuations in the long-term upward trend are natural and expected. Nonetheless, global temperatures are still on the rise and are expected to rise further. Climate change will accelerate significantly if global emissions of heat-trapping gases continue to increase.

https://www.globalchange.gov/climate-cha...pening-why

A) the temperature data that's been collected has been corrupted by increasingly putting the measuring devices closer to the sources of hot air.

B) the East Anglia scandal was of such gigantic proportions that the data simply can't be trusted.

C) There have been times in the world's history where the temperatures were significantly warmer than they are now BEFORE the world became so industrialized.

The biggest environmental problem is worldwide deforestation which is a problem that is often due to oppressive governing. The people become so poor that they strip the land. The 'fix' in those cases is to change the government, not to make rules that further oppress the people who are sometimes starving.

sad2.gif state of affairs, I must say, in whatever is causing climate change or non-global warming.
02-02-2018, 01:03 AM #24
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
And then I keep reading research on how wildlife is affected by this alleged warming.

Quote:Although capable of swimming long distances, polar bears burn far more energy doing so than walking, a recent study published in Polar Biology found.

“As the sea ice melts earlier and earlier, polar bears are forced to swim more and more, to reach seal populations,” said author Blaine Griffen, a biologist at BYU in a release. One female bear Griffen studied swam 426 miles over nine days. She lost 22 percent of her body weight and, worse, lost the nursing cub that had started the journey with her.

More swimming could lead to smaller bears, reduced reproduction rates, and even increased risk of death—something already being seen in western Hudson Bay and around the southern Beaufort Sea, Griffen said.

There’s no doubt that as the sea ice declines more and more bears are going to starve to death, said Amstrup. “I don’t know if that poor bear in that video was starving. I do know that the only solution for the long-term survival of the polar bear is to address climate change.”

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018...81021375=1
02-02-2018, 01:30 AM #25
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,210 Threads:191 Joined:Apr 2013
(02-02-2018, 01:03 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And then I keep reading research on how wildlife is affected by this alleged warming.

Quote:Although capable of swimming long distances, polar bears burn far more energy doing so than walking, a recent study published in Polar Biology found.

“As the sea ice melts earlier and earlier, polar bears are forced to swim more and more, to reach seal populations,” said author Blaine Griffen, a biologist at BYU in a release. One female bear Griffen studied swam 426 miles over nine days. She lost 22 percent of her body weight and, worse, lost the nursing cub that had started the journey with her.

More swimming could lead to smaller bears, reduced reproduction rates, and even increased risk of death—something already being seen in western Hudson Bay and around the southern Beaufort Sea, Griffen said.

There’s no doubt that as the sea ice declines more and more bears are going to starve to death, said Amstrup. “I don’t know if that poor bear in that video was starving. I do know that the only solution for the long-term survival of the polar bear is to address climate change.”

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018...81021375=1

Polar bears have been swimming several hundred miles since they first appeared on earth. Losing cubs is something that also happens on a regular basis. The populations of predators and prey can change by a factor of 10. It happens quite a bit.

I am deeply concerned about Fuku and do believe there is overfishing with gigantic floating ocean raping ships as well. Fuku is serious enough to cause unfathomable harm to a huge portion of the earth. We'll never be told just how much harm Fuku has done because Obama's admin either stopped recording the radiation levels and/or hid it.

Pray for me. hug.gif
02-02-2018, 11:25 AM #26
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-02-2018, 01:30 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:03 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And then I keep reading research on how wildlife is affected by this alleged warming.

Quote:Although capable of swimming long distances, polar bears burn far more energy doing so than walking, a recent study published in Polar Biology found.

“As the sea ice melts earlier and earlier, polar bears are forced to swim more and more, to reach seal populations,” said author Blaine Griffen, a biologist at BYU in a release. One female bear Griffen studied swam 426 miles over nine days. She lost 22 percent of her body weight and, worse, lost the nursing cub that had started the journey with her.

More swimming could lead to smaller bears, reduced reproduction rates, and even increased risk of death—something already being seen in western Hudson Bay and around the southern Beaufort Sea, Griffen said.

There’s no doubt that as the sea ice declines more and more bears are going to starve to death, said Amstrup. “I don’t know if that poor bear in that video was starving. I do know that the only solution for the long-term survival of the polar bear is to address climate change.”

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018...81021375=1

Polar bears have been swimming several hundred miles since they first appeared on earth. Losing cubs is something that also happens on a regular basis. The populations of predators and prey can change by a factor of 10. It happens quite a bit.

I am deeply concerned about Fuku and do believe there is overfishing with gigantic floating ocean raping ships as well. Fuku is serious enough to cause unfathomable harm to a huge portion of the earth. We'll never be told just how much harm Fuku has done because Obama's admin either stopped recording the radiation levels and/or hid it.

Please post your polar bear research source so that I may look over the methodology and decide for myself.
02-02-2018, 02:44 PM #27
Strigoi Member
Posts:1,056 Threads:60 Joined:Mar 2011
(02-02-2018, 12:43 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  sad2.gif state of affairs, I must say, in whatever is causing climate change or non-global warming.

I don't think there is anything to worry about. historically it's cyclic.

Un Strigoi printre noi
02-02-2018, 07:00 PM #28
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,210 Threads:191 Joined:Apr 2013
(02-02-2018, 11:25 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:30 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:03 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And then I keep reading research on how wildlife is affected by this alleged warming.

Quote:Although capable of swimming long distances, polar bears burn far more energy doing so than walking, a recent study published in Polar Biology found.

“As the sea ice melts earlier and earlier, polar bears are forced to swim more and more, to reach seal populations,” said author Blaine Griffen, a biologist at BYU in a release. One female bear Griffen studied swam 426 miles over nine days. She lost 22 percent of her body weight and, worse, lost the nursing cub that had started the journey with her.

More swimming could lead to smaller bears, reduced reproduction rates, and even increased risk of death—something already being seen in western Hudson Bay and around the southern Beaufort Sea, Griffen said.

There’s no doubt that as the sea ice declines more and more bears are going to starve to death, said Amstrup. “I don’t know if that poor bear in that video was starving. I do know that the only solution for the long-term survival of the polar bear is to address climate change.”

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018...81021375=1

Polar bears have been swimming several hundred miles since they first appeared on earth. Losing cubs is something that also happens on a regular basis. The populations of predators and prey can change by a factor of 10. It happens quite a bit.

I am deeply concerned about Fuku and do believe there is overfishing with gigantic floating ocean raping ships as well. Fuku is serious enough to cause unfathomable harm to a huge portion of the earth. We'll never be told just how much harm Fuku has done because Obama's admin either stopped recording the radiation levels and/or hid it.

Please post your polar bear research source so that I may look over the methodology and decide for myself.

There is no methodology for tracking polar bears over tens or hundreds of thousands of square miles in the most extreme of climate areas. Anyone who claims they have such a methodology has more hubris than the average bear.

They sold you a story of one bear with a drowned cub. That's not methodology. - that's a technique successfully used and made famous by Readers' Digest Magazine to capture your imagination. It worked. Stories are the most effective persuasive tool used by marketers as well. For example, a great story can sell seven times the amount of product as a sales letter that doesn't have a story...it's that effective.

We see an underfed bear and her cub and it fills our imagination. I don't doubt that bears are being effected by those huge fish raping ships. They wipe out fish populations which starves the seals of their food source. which in turn hurts polar bears. That's not global warming.

Global warming is a money making scam for the likes of Al Gore who has made over $250 million dollars selling carbon credits. So he fills his pockets while he flies in a fuel guzzling private jet and burns fossil fuel at his home at a rate that is 23 times higher than the average family. Meanwhile, the ships continue to strip the ecology bare to the word's detriment.

Some bears are starving, but not Al Gore.

Pray for me. hug.gif
02-02-2018, 07:31 PM #29
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-02-2018, 07:00 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 11:25 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:30 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:03 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And then I keep reading research on how wildlife is affected by this alleged warming.

Quote:Although capable of swimming long distances, polar bears burn far more energy doing so than walking, a recent study published in Polar Biology found.

“As the sea ice melts earlier and earlier, polar bears are forced to swim more and more, to reach seal populations,” said author Blaine Griffen, a biologist at BYU in a release. One female bear Griffen studied swam 426 miles over nine days. She lost 22 percent of her body weight and, worse, lost the nursing cub that had started the journey with her.

More swimming could lead to smaller bears, reduced reproduction rates, and even increased risk of death—something already being seen in western Hudson Bay and around the southern Beaufort Sea, Griffen said.

There’s no doubt that as the sea ice declines more and more bears are going to starve to death, said Amstrup. “I don’t know if that poor bear in that video was starving. I do know that the only solution for the long-term survival of the polar bear is to address climate change.”

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018...81021375=1

Polar bears have been swimming several hundred miles since they first appeared on earth. Losing cubs is something that also happens on a regular basis. The populations of predators and prey can change by a factor of 10. It happens quite a bit.

I am deeply concerned about Fuku and do believe there is overfishing with gigantic floating ocean raping ships as well. Fuku is serious enough to cause unfathomable harm to a huge portion of the earth. We'll never be told just how much harm Fuku has done because Obama's admin either stopped recording the radiation levels and/or hid it.

Please post your polar bear research source so that I may look over the methodology and decide for myself.

There is no methodology for tracking polar bears over tens or hundreds of thousands of square miles in the most extreme of climate areas. Anyone who claims they have such a methodology has more hubris than the average bear.

They sold you a story of one bear with a drowned cub. That's not methodology. - that's a technique successfully used and made famous by Readers' Digest Magazine to capture your imagination. It worked. Stories are the most effective persuasive tool used by marketers as well. For example, a great story can sell seven times the amount of product as a sales letter that doesn't have a story...it's that effective.

We see an underfed bear and her cub and it fills our imagination. I don't doubt that bears are being effected by those huge fish raping ships. They wipe out fish populations which starves the seals of their food source. which in turn hurts polar bears. That's not global warming.

Global warming is a money making scam for the likes of Al Gore who has made over $250 million dollars selling carbon credits. So he fills his pockets while he flies in a fuel guzzling private jet and burns fossil fuel at his home at a rate that is 23 times higher than the average family. Meanwhile, the ships continue to strip the ecology bare to the word's detriment.

Some bears are starving, but not Al Gore.

The source I posted above is considered new science and from the USGS, so their methodology in my opinion outweighs any hypothesis you can come up with because you offer no scientific studies.
02-02-2018, 08:09 PM #30
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:2,210 Threads:191 Joined:Apr 2013
(02-02-2018, 07:31 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 07:00 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 11:25 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:30 AM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  
(02-02-2018, 01:03 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  And then I keep reading research on how wildlife is affected by this alleged warming.


https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018...81021375=1

Polar bears have been swimming several hundred miles since they first appeared on earth. Losing cubs is something that also happens on a regular basis. The populations of predators and prey can change by a factor of 10. It happens quite a bit.

I am deeply concerned about Fuku and do believe there is overfishing with gigantic floating ocean raping ships as well. Fuku is serious enough to cause unfathomable harm to a huge portion of the earth. We'll never be told just how much harm Fuku has done because Obama's admin either stopped recording the radiation levels and/or hid it.

Please post your polar bear research source so that I may look over the methodology and decide for myself.

There is no methodology for tracking polar bears over tens or hundreds of thousands of square miles in the most extreme of climate areas. Anyone who claims they have such a methodology has more hubris than the average bear.

They sold you a story of one bear with a drowned cub. That's not methodology. - that's a technique successfully used and made famous by Readers' Digest Magazine to capture your imagination. It worked. Stories are the most effective persuasive tool used by marketers as well. For example, a great story can sell seven times the amount of product as a sales letter that doesn't have a story...it's that effective.

We see an underfed bear and her cub and it fills our imagination. I don't doubt that bears are being effected by those huge fish raping ships. They wipe out fish populations which starves the seals of their food source. which in turn hurts polar bears. That's not global warming.

Global warming is a money making scam for the likes of Al Gore who has made over $250 million dollars selling carbon credits. So he fills his pockets while he flies in a fuel guzzling private jet and burns fossil fuel at his home at a rate that is 23 times higher than the average family. Meanwhile, the ships continue to strip the ecology bare to the word's detriment.

Some bears are starving, but not Al Gore.

The source I posted above is considered new science and from the USGS, so their methodology in my opinion outweighs any hypothesis you can come up with because you offer no scientific studies.

Like I said, any claim to be able to track polar bears is horsesh**. Pretending to give it a patina of science is more of the same.

If you want science, 23 times the fossil fuel usage by All Conman Gore is a specific number. What if everyone used the amount of fuel he uses - what would happen to global warming then! I'm sorry but you can't eat 23 times the amount of food as everyone else and be a diet guru. Gore is a gobbler.

Meanwhile polar bears are still here although they have lived through warmer climate eras. How did they manage to pull through without the $300 million dollar man to protect them? By the way, most of the areas where the bears travel have INSUFFICIENT DATA to make any conclusions.

Pray for me. hug.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com