#Login Register

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Lac-Megantic train derailment
07-10-2013, 07:47 AM #16
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,896 Threads:1,456 Joined:Feb 2011
A new and ominous development... edition.cnn.com

Quote:Canadian authorities have found evidence that a criminal act may have led to a train crash in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, that killed at least 15 people, provincial police Capt. Michel Forget said Tuesday.

There have been many questions about the crash and explosion that wiped out a swath of the town 130 miles east of Montreal. As of Tuesday evening, 35 people were still missing, Forget said.

Authorities offered no further details about the case but said it was not caused by terrorism.

"I will not speculate on the elements that we have recovered," Forget told reporters.

Oh really?

Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-10-2013, 10:34 AM #17
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
(07-09-2013, 09:12 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Horrible tragedy. The trains are so technologically backward in the safety area. Every time I sit at a train crossing watching the train go by, there's always that niggling doubt about it's safety. Is it my time to go now? damned.gif

With this, we now have the train company blaming the firefighters that the train people told to leave after the firefighters put out a little fire before entering the town...the government will be looking to criminally prosecute the train company for not implementing high tech, costly upgraded technology (which they cannot afford and which the government does not want to help them with $).

Do I blame government for not stepping in sooner and taking control....catch 22? In this case, all I care about is everyone's safety...and that includes crumbling infrastructure too (esp. bridges).

Burkhardt said firefighters put out the small fire with handheld extinguishers and then shut down the idling locomotive without asking for permission. As the firefighters were on their way back from the scene, they met a company official they had asked to meet them and informed him of what they had done.

“When the locomotive shut down it was just a matter of time until the leakage of air out of the brake cylinders would allow the brakes to release, and that’s exactly what happened,” Burkhardt said.

Seems to me it shouldn't take some high tech gizmo.

You simply leave the brakes on... they took them off by turning off the train because the firefighters didn't know what the ğck they were doing ...heavy load. emergency brake not enough. Clearly in the guidelines they follow. What else could be done? Totally redesign the brake systems on the new engines? decommission all of the old ones because they use air brakes that require a compressor to stay on?

Don't know why the article goes on and on about what cold have caused it when it was stated right there that the firemen notified the train official they turned off the engine. The only question I would have is did the official have time to run to the train to start it back up? or was it already too late?

Stupid mistake with horrible consequences and the firefighters don't want to take the blame. No doubt this will lead to some new bullshit regulations that will do nothing to actually improve any safety.



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com