#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Lame attempt to discredit truthers?
02-10-2013, 03:22 AM #1
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,219 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:PARIS -- A woman defaced Eugene Delacroix's painting "Liberty Leading the People" with a black marker as it hung in an outpost of the Louvre gallery in northern France.

Police arrested a 28-year-old woman on Thursday for writing "AE911" across the bottom of a painting so closely identified with the French Republic that its image once graced the 100-franc note and it has been reproduced on postage stamps.

"AE911Truth" is the name of a website called "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" whose backers say they are seeking to establish the truth of the Sept. 11, 2001 suicide airliner attacks on New York's Twin Towers.
...
However, the Louvre confirmed Friday it had managed to save the painting as the black marker had not penetrated the upper layer of varnish and has been successfully removed.

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...arker?lite

Smells like bullshit to me. May be some idiot decided to go full retard on a painting, but msm sure thought it was important news.

coffeetime.gif
02-10-2013, 03:37 AM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,467 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
Yes god forbid anyone interject any common sense on that subject. Whoever tries is a MORON, and the subject is closed.

We all know it was a plot contrived in a cave in Afghanistan by Osama Bin Laden, who was on kidney dialysis at the time; and those dumbass architects and engineers who support such fallacies are, in fact - terrorists.

God knows we all know more than architects and engineers.

Here is the official govt account. Any tin foil hat wearing paranoid conspiracy theorists who disagrees is a douchebag.

coffeetime.gif


wonder.gif
02-10-2013, 03:39 AM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,219 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
Would this have hit the news if that 28-year-old woman had drawn a penis on the painting?
02-10-2013, 03:41 AM #4
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,467 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
coffeetime.gif Are you accusing an untarnished angel like the MSM of picking and choosing to sway public opinion?
If so that's just crazy.
They are as unbiased as the day is long.

wonder.gif
02-10-2013, 10:09 PM #5
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(02-10-2013, 03:37 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Yes god forbid anyone interject any common sense on that subject. Whoever tries is a MORON, and the subject is closed.

We all know it was a plot contrived in a cave in Afghanistan by Osama Bin Laden, who was on kidney dialysis at the time; and those dumbass architects and engineers who support such fallacies are, in fact - terrorists.

God knows we all know more than architects and engineers.

Here is the official govt account. Any tin foil hat wearing paranoid conspiracy theorists who disagrees is a douchebag.

coffeetime.gif


The engineering societies, in particular the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) helped NIST with the analysis. There were probably more engineers involved in the actual analysis than have signed on to AE911.

So... it is the official position of millions of engineers that the official analysis is what happened.

A few million engineers vs a handful of unstable malcontents...

02-10-2013, 10:26 PM #6
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,971 Threads:71 Joined:Feb 2011
(02-10-2013, 10:09 PM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  The engineering societies, in particular the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) helped NIST with the analysis. There were probably more engineers involved in the actual analysis than have signed on to AE911.

So... it is the official position of millions of engineers that the official analysis is what happened.

A few million engineers vs a handful of unstable malcontents...


Interesting wording there, オタマジャクシ, "unstable malcontents".
Sort of proves the point of the thread, if you catch my drift.








JollyRoger Show this Post
02-10-2013, 10:28 PM #7
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-10-2013, 03:22 AM)Octo Wrote:  
Quote:PARIS -- A woman defaced Eugene Delacroix's painting "Liberty Leading the People" with a black marker as it hung in an outpost of the Louvre gallery in northern France.

Police arrested a 28-year-old woman on Thursday for writing "AE911" across the bottom of a painting so closely identified with the French Republic that its image once graced the 100-franc note and it has been reproduced on postage stamps.

"AE911Truth" is the name of a website called "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" whose backers say they are seeking to establish the truth of the Sept. 11, 2001 suicide airliner attacks on New York's Twin Towers.
...
However, the Louvre confirmed Friday it had managed to save the painting as the black marker had not penetrated the upper layer of varnish and has been successfully removed.

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...arker?lite

Smells like bullshit to me. May be some idiot decided to go full retard on a painting, but msm sure thought it was important news.

coffeetime.gif


Defacing any form of art is a sin. Even if what is defacing it is considered art.
02-10-2013, 10:45 PM #8
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,467 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
(02-10-2013, 10:26 PM)Accidental Stoner Wrote:  
(02-10-2013, 10:09 PM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  The engineering societies, in particular the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) helped NIST with the analysis. There were probably more engineers involved in the actual analysis than have signed on to AE911.

So... it is the official position of millions of engineers that the official analysis is what happened.

A few million engineers vs a handful of unstable malcontents...


Interesting wording there, オタマジャクシ, "unstable malcontents".
Sort of proves the point of the thread, if you catch my drift.


yup.gif

wonder.gif
02-10-2013, 11:41 PM #9
オタマジャクシ Member
Posts:1,310 Threads:32 Joined:Nov 2012
(02-10-2013, 10:26 PM)Accidental Stoner Wrote:  
(02-10-2013, 10:09 PM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  The engineering societies, in particular the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) helped NIST with the analysis. There were probably more engineers involved in the actual analysis than have signed on to AE911.

So... it is the official position of millions of engineers that the official analysis is what happened.

A few million engineers vs a handful of unstable malcontents...


Interesting wording there, オタマジャクシ, "unstable malcontents".
Sort of proves the point of the thread, if you catch my drift.


Most engineers regard refuting the village idiot as an unnecessary waste time.

That is why very few engineers weigh in on 9/11.

02-11-2013, 12:50 AM #10
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,467 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
I've worked for years in engineering, and know demolition when I see it. Lets say for the sake of argument that this village idiot saw building 7 standing in the background when the BBC was reporting it had already collapsed.
If you will be so kind, please elaborate on your take on that and clear that up for the rest of the world once and for all.
Type slowly so all the idiots can understand. coffeetime.gif

wonder.gif
02-11-2013, 01:13 AM #11
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,467 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
(02-10-2013, 10:09 PM)オタマジャクシ Wrote:  
(02-10-2013, 03:37 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Yes god forbid anyone interject any common sense on that subject. Whoever tries is a MORON, and the subject is closed.

We all know it was a plot contrived in a cave in Afghanistan by Osama Bin Laden, who was on kidney dialysis at the time; and those dumbass architects and engineers who support such fallacies are, in fact - terrorists.

God knows we all know more than architects and engineers.

Here is the official govt account. Any tin foil hat wearing paranoid conspiracy theorists who disagrees is a douchebag.

coffeetime.gif


The engineering societies, in particular the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) helped NIST with the analysis. There were probably more engineers involved in the actual analysis than have signed on to AE911.

So... it is the official position of millions of engineers that the official analysis is what happened.

A few million engineers vs a handful of unstable malcontents...


The engineers findings didn't make it into the The 9-11 Commission Report .
The Report did not deal with the evidence that supports the conclusion that the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 (WTC 7) were destroyed by controlled demolition.
The Report avoided even mentioning the complete, symmetrical, and rapid collapse of WTC 7, although that collapse was unprecedented in the 100-plus-year history of steel-framed skyscrapers.
So regardless of how many engineers worked on it, it was left out of the report, and for all intents and purposes that means they were not even involved.
On the other hand, over 1,700 architects & engineers demanding a real 9/11 investigation are signed up on their facebook page.
zero vs. over 1,700. I can do that math without a calculator believe it or not.

wonder.gif
JollyRoger Show this Post
02-11-2013, 01:15 AM #12
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
We will never find out what really happened. Just like John and Robert Kennedy.
JollyRoger Show this Post
02-11-2013, 01:17 AM #13
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-11-2013, 01:15 AM)JollyRoger Wrote:  We will never find out what really happened. Just like John and Robert Kennedy.


However, I submit to you that both crimes were committed by the same people. (Kennedy assassinations and 9/11). Same mutherfucker pulled both triggers.

Bet.

damned.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
02-11-2013, 06:56 PM #14
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(02-10-2013, 03:39 AM)Octo Wrote:  Would this have hit the news if that 28-year-old woman had drawn a penis on the painting?


yes. at least i hope so. :D
02-11-2013, 09:20 PM #15
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,219 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
chuckle.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com