#Login Register


  • 12 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
Home 


Look who filed for divorce today
11-11-2016, 05:58 AM #1
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
11-11-2016, 06:49 AM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,542 Threads:1,489 Joined:Feb 2011
Holy crap! batboy.jpg

I'm sure she's plenty pissed off she spent all those years with Bill in vain.
11-11-2016, 07:35 AM #3
-NIGHTMARE- Member
Posts:897 Threads:6 Joined:Aug 2012
Hoax

' Welcome to My Nightmare '
11-11-2016, 09:01 AM #4
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
(11-11-2016, 07:35 AM)-NIGHTMARE- Wrote:  Hoax

How do you know. The paperwork looks right

aaah2.gif
11-11-2016, 01:01 PM #5
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,907 Threads:664 Joined:Feb 2011
(11-11-2016, 09:01 AM)Screaming Yellow Zonkers Wrote:  
(11-11-2016, 07:35 AM)-NIGHTMARE- Wrote:  Hoax

How do you know. The paperwork looks right

I will say one thing about it. If it is a hoax the person that did it either did their homework or has had a divorce in NY. In most states, divorces are handled in Divorce Court, Family Court or Superior Court and not their Supreme Court as NY uses.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
11-11-2016, 01:24 PM #6
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,699 Threads:1,446 Joined:Feb 2011
Quite interesting but strikes me as satire.

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
11-11-2016, 03:29 PM #7
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Is this real?
11-11-2016, 03:34 PM #8
Totie Member
Posts:106 Threads:9 Joined:Dec 2015
According to snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-fi...rk-courts/
This is a hoax.
11-11-2016, 04:03 PM #9
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,542 Threads:1,489 Joined:Feb 2011
Hey at 5:49 AM I'm not going to fact check anything İmage
failboat Show this Post
11-12-2016, 12:39 AM #10
failboat Incognito Anonymous
 


11-12-2016, 01:46 AM #11
Screaming Yellow Zonkers Member
Posts:2,706 Threads:265 Joined:Apr 2013
I believe nothing on snopes. Huffington post said it's not true. I'm still on the tiles..... We shall see.
It makes sense to me.

aaah2.gif
Chuck Norse Show this Post
11-12-2016, 02:20 PM #12
Chuck Norse Incognito Anonymous
 
I Have been trying to tell everyone that Snopes is Fake & can not be used for the truth
& Now I have the Proof!!!

Snopes is run by a man and a woman with no background in investigation using Google.

Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. Once negative article by them and people point and say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in investigative research.


David and Barbara Mikkelson are from San Fernando Valley of California. They started their website 'Snopes' about 13 years ago. After a few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and neutral. But over the past couple of years people started asking questions when 'Snopes' was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in controversial issues.


In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville, Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet. The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inacuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.

But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet, Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the "final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their "fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the "main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others, as being particularly biased and agenda-modivated.


So if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have heard, by all means do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you were a liberal with an internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com either as their team of amateur editors have also been caught in a number of bold-faced liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate and their religious treatment of Obama.) Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding that they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things conservative. Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read their sources for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do.
11-12-2016, 07:48 PM #13
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,542 Threads:1,489 Joined:Feb 2011
Chuck Norse? rofl.gif
11-13-2016, 02:31 PM #14
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,699 Threads:1,446 Joined:Feb 2011
He wears ribbed condoms inside out for his pleasure.

wonder.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com