#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Metallo nei megaliti di Stonehenge
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
12-19-2012, 05:40 PM #1
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
İmage
http://www.ermetica.net/pk/?p=962

I had seen this in photos before and always want to see a closer shot of it.

I always suspected something in the core of these stones but not the whole stone itself with merely a covering.

Weren't these verified as high cobalt content blue stone coming from a particular place far away? Maybe they were chiseled out and had the metal(looks like iron) cast inside? The cobalt quality of the blue stone further enhancing the frequency of the fields?

I have heard stories of people being "shocked" before... now they make alot more sense.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
12-19-2012, 05:41 PM #2
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Doesn't this stone on the left look patched?
İmage
12-19-2012, 05:52 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,602 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Hmmm... I have not seen that before. Very strange. It does look like some iron compound underneath the rock. 13.gif
12-19-2012, 05:57 PM #4
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
damned.gif

Biere.
12-19-2012, 06:11 PM #5
DiggerDawg Member
Posts:380 Threads:34 Joined:Sep 2012
How They Rebuilt Stonehenge

The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.

And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives of complaint. But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day, John Ruskin, released the maxim which was to outlive him.... 'Restoration is a lie,' he stormed. Nevertheless the Stonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 1959 and 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones have been moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'

A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in 1959 and four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erectïon of the Trilithon in 1958.
wave.gif


http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicstonehenge.htm
12-19-2012, 06:17 PM #6
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,602 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
hmm.gif

I have to look into this a bit later, I'm on my way to school. gaah.gif
12-19-2012, 06:19 PM #7
yankees skier
Posts:5,898 Threads:215 Joined:Feb 2011
(12-19-2012, 06:17 PM)Octo Wrote:  hmm.gif

I have to look into this a bit later, I'm on my way to school. gaah.gif

wave.gif

Biere.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
12-19-2012, 06:23 PM #8
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
İmage
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
12-19-2012, 07:01 PM #9
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(12-19-2012, 06:11 PM)DiggerDawg Wrote:  How They Rebuilt Stonehenge

The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.

And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives of complaint. But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day, John Ruskin, released the maxim which was to outlive him.... 'Restoration is a lie,' he stormed. Nevertheless the Stonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 1959 and 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones have been moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'

A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in 1959 and four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erectïon of the Trilithon in 1958.
wave.gif


http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicstonehenge.htm


...unless they were incorporating some very thick iron plate into the stones I think perhaps alot of the patchwork was done to keep this secret and now some of it has fallen off? I never thought of it as just a calendar and it's ley line location is not coincidence. It was put there with an ancient technological purpose... I suspect a kind of magnifier or "lens" ...perhaps part of an ancient grid network?

You can see a hunk of the side laying there in front of it. Is that old patch concrete? or part of the original stone? Maybe it is iron work that was put in there to fix this broken stone? Seems quite an undertaking.



...now that I am taking a closer look I think I see some straight edges at the top of the iron block where the crack in the front comes to a point and on the side. I am getting the impression that maybe this stone was broke off at the base so they hollowed out a portion of it and created an iron "peg" for it to sit on. The sides of which have since broken off.

Regardless this does not negate my previous ancient tech statements as these stones have naturally high metal content and associated properties.
12-19-2012, 07:07 PM #10
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,279 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Fascinating. I have to dig into to this a bit... reading.gif

wonder.gif
12-20-2012, 01:16 AM #11
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,602 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
I find it very interesting that Lodestone on Wikipedia is only translated to Dutch and Icelandic. 13.gif


Seguljárnsteinn in Icelandic btw.

12-20-2012, 01:44 AM #12
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,602 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Take away the segul and it sounds exactly how I pronounce iron stone colloquially.

The Lode part should logically be the same word as Lod in Swedish which is interesting considering this:

Swedish------------English
Lod (weight)------Plumb-bob
Lod (textile)-------A weight related to weaving
Lodning------------Depth sounding
Lod (measure)---Lot (unit)
Lödning-------------Soldering

Silver also showed up in my wiki search.
12-20-2012, 03:35 AM #13
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,602 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Well I think the 'magnet' translation leaves out a whole lod of things.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com