#Login Register

  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average

Minister receives petition to review GE foods
Zelcor40 Show this Post
06-06-2013, 07:39 AM #1
Zelcor40 Incognito Anonymous
Quote:GE Free NZ met with the Food Safety Minister, Nikki Kaye, and her policy advisers to request an immediate review of the latest herbicide tolerant GE soy that is resistant to being sprayed with 2,4-D, Round Up and Glufosinate, she approved for our food supply.

The meeting focused on GE Free’s concerns surrounding the genetically engineered soy application, and the process followed by the Trans Tasman Food Standards Australia New Zealand Authority (FSANZ) on GE food approvals and new and emerging evidence. FSANZ provided submitters with over 30,000 pages of data on the creation and genetic makeup of this soybean, DAS44406-6. However, when asked for the proof of safety when people consume the food, they could not produce even one page on feeding studies.

In April, the USDA United States Dept. of Agriculture deferred a decision on the approval of 2,4-D resistant soybean for commercialisation due to lack of evidence of either environmental or human safety.

"This soy bean contains a barrage of engineered genes that make it resistant to a cocktail of highly toxic chemicals, it has never been tested on any animal or person" said Claire Bleakley president of GE Free NZ.

Genetically engineered (GE) foods undergo special assessment via Food Safety laws because of the new laboratory-created transgenic genes that they contain. This is to ensure that the foods protect consumer’s health.

"We cannot understand how a body of assessors can ask the Minister to approve a GE food as safe to eat, when there have been no studies on it. It does not meet regulatory requirements that the public expects to protect their health."

Evidence is now showing that GE foods have differing levels of essential nutrients and some new proteins as well as having the potential to contain levels of chemical herbicide and insecticides over 200 times greater than non-GE foods. Yet, these significant differences are considered not "biologically meaningful" and passed over by the expert assessors, although they have caused serious harm to the animals that are eating it. These studies have shown endocrine and tumour generating effects; health professionals are beginning to see a clinical link between digestive problems, irritable bowel syndrome and even bleeding in the bowel and eating GE foods.

"We were told at the meeting that there are no human studies on GE foods and their effects," said Mrs. Bleakley. "This is not good enough; if a child or anyone else has an adverse reaction from eating a GE food there are no diagnostic tools or the ability of any health professional to detect any relationship let alone know how to treat the illness".

We asked the Minister to table a 1000 + signature petition in parliament on our behalf, she intends to make a decision by 11th June.

The petition was collected on the day of the March Against Monsanto and asks the Minister to: -

1. Freeze all new applications for GE foods while the FSANZ safety assessment regime is aligned with the European Food Safety Authority guidelines on GE; and past approvals are reassessed.

2. Enforcement and full labelling of all foods made using GE techniques including processed products such as: vegetable oils, starches, sugars, and meat, milk and eggs from animals fed GE feed.

3. Removal of exemptions from GE labelling requirements in Food Standard 1.5.2 so any trace of a GE organism in a foodstuff, stock feed or seed must be fully and clearly labelled as GE in origin.

"We are angry that the Minister signed this dangerous GE soy food into law before meeting with us and believe that the hurdles that she will have to overcome will make it almost impossible for her to withdraw the food. With the total absence of feeding studies she appears to have put her trade responsibilities before the health of New Zealanders" said Mrs. Bleakley.
We are awaiting the outcome of the Regulatory Review committee on our submission to look into the process for New Zealand assessment of GE foods, the meeting to consider this was held on the 5th June.




DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com