#Login Register


  • 4 Vote(s) - 3.25 Average
Home 


Mitt Romney is Being Sued in Federal Court for Criminal Racketeering
01-04-2014, 06:57 AM #1
Not Sure Member
Posts:28 Threads:4 Joined:Dec 2012
01-04-2014, 07:37 AM #2
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
If they had solid evidence they would've filed criminal charges.
01-04-2014, 09:20 AM #3
Softy Incognito Anonymous
 
They got nothing...

(:X
01-04-2014, 10:11 AM #4
Not Sure Member
Posts:28 Threads:4 Joined:Dec 2012
(01-04-2014, 07:37 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  If they had solid evidence they would've filed criminal charges.

That does not mean they are not guilty,

This kind of shït goes on all the time... it is rare that it ever reaches this level of attention at all.
01-04-2014, 10:15 AM #5
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(01-04-2014, 10:11 AM)Not Sure Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 07:37 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  If they had solid evidence they would've filed criminal charges.

That does not mean they are not guilty,

This kind of shït goes on all the time... it is rare that it ever reaches this level of attention at all.

I am not defending him in anyway I am just saying if he committed a crime they should charge hm but if they dont that means they dont have much on him.

I could say you did something then sue but that dont make you guilty. OJ was found not guilty by law(regardless of whether he did it or not just an example) and they sued him.
01-04-2014, 10:23 AM #6
Not Sure Member
Posts:28 Threads:4 Joined:Dec 2012
(01-04-2014, 10:15 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 10:11 AM)Not Sure Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 07:37 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  If they had solid evidence they would've filed criminal charges.

That does not mean they are not guilty,

This kind of shït goes on all the time... it is rare that it ever reaches this level of attention at all.

I am not defending him in anyway I am just saying if he committed a crime they should charge hm but if they dont that means they dont have much on him.

I could say you did something then sue but that dont make you guilty. OJ was found not guilty by law(regardless of whether he did it or not just an example) and they sued him.

Maybe they realize the fight would be too hard in criminal court? ...even with good evidence whole teams of lawyers can be quite formidable and they would be more amiable to settling this way and it still gets public attention ...and taints the public record of these pieces shït.
01-04-2014, 10:37 AM #7
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(01-04-2014, 10:23 AM)Not Sure Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 10:15 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 10:11 AM)Not Sure Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 07:37 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  If they had solid evidence they would've filed criminal charges.

That does not mean they are not guilty,

This kind of shït goes on all the time... it is rare that it ever reaches this level of attention at all.

I am not defending him in anyway I am just saying if he committed a crime they should charge hm but if they dont that means they dont have much on him.

I could say you did something then sue but that dont make you guilty. OJ was found not guilty by law(regardless of whether he did it or not just an example) and they sued him.

Maybe they realize the fight would be too hard in criminal court? ...even with good evidence whole teams of lawyers can be quite formidable and they would be more amiable to settling this way and it still gets public attention ...and taints the public record of these pieces shït.

He doesn't pay taxes thanks to the Mormon church and that can be proven but its legal thanks to loopholes. The problem is that the people that make the laws know exactly how to break them without getting caught.
van down by the river Show this Post
01-08-2014, 06:36 AM #8
van down by the river Incognito Anonymous
 
(01-04-2014, 10:23 AM)Not Sure Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 10:15 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 10:11 AM)Not Sure Wrote:  
(01-04-2014, 07:37 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  If they had solid evidence they would've filed criminal charges.

That does not mean they are not guilty,

This kind of shït goes on all the time... it is rare that it ever reaches this level of attention at all.

I am not defending him in anyway I am just saying if he committed a crime they should charge hm but if they dont that means they dont have much on him.

I could say you did something then sue but that dont make you guilty. OJ was found not guilty by law(regardless of whether he did it or not just an example) and they sued him.

Maybe they realize the fight would be too hard in criminal court? ...even with good evidence whole teams of lawyers can be quite formidable and they would be more amiable to settling this way and it still gets public attention ...and taints the public record of these pieces shït.

Sometimes we're to young to know any better and when we here news like this we think it's finally the straw that broke the camels back. Sorry to let you know that the buffoonery of these types of people have went on for years AND if tainting their public record worked to get rid of them we wouldn't have the problems with "elected" officials that we have now. We the people are responsible for letting, allowing AND keeping all of them in power. Let us knows if this goes anywhere...but I'm guessing that we won't hear much of anything out of you or it when it's over. That being...because nothing will happen except a lot of lawyers, judges and other public officials made great coin off of it.

EUhaha.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
01-08-2014, 12:53 PM #9
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
like babies crying over milkbottle!



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com