#Login Register


  • 7 Vote(s) - 2.86 Average
Home 


Morality of the A-bomb
02-22-2014, 10:40 PM #16
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-22-2014, 03:54 PM)Beyond Smolensk Wrote:  Theres literally thousands of these sinister terrifying hydrogen bombs all over the world...

Any one of them could and would instantly destroy a city and kill millions of people...

Crush kill destroy by demons be driven thats what the powers that be do best...

Watch and listen to this horrifying diabolical pure evil being unleashed...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5_9Gi7w19Y

Thats the modern a-bomb much much more destructive than the ones used in 1945. In 1945 they were destroying whole cities with napalm firebombs and in 24hours they killed 100k people in Tokyo.

I believe that using it was the only way to end the war quickly.
02-22-2014, 10:59 PM #17
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,606 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(02-22-2014, 05:11 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  People say that there is never a reason to use those a-bombs. But what if you could end a major war that will kill millions by using it to take out say Germany before they could even start, would that be morally acceptable?

A preemptive strike with an atomic bomb? damned.gif Hell no. How could it be morally acceptable to kill millions of people to save millions of people? Besides, the majority of people in any country doesn't want war, the warmongers and their financiers do. And they're not bound by national borders.
02-22-2014, 11:07 PM #18
Below Average Genius Member
Posts:1,786 Threads:137 Joined:Apr 2013
Long after WWII in the 50's and early '60's the estimates are that between 40 and 70 million Chinese were murdered by the the Chinese government in furtherance of Mao's Five Year Plans either at the end of a gun or through starvation.

Since then students in college could be seen wearing Mao tee shirts probably clueless as to what an evil narcissistic monster he was.

Pray for me. hug.gif
02-23-2014, 12:52 AM #19
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-22-2014, 10:59 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(02-22-2014, 05:11 AM)KILLUMINATI Wrote:  People say that there is never a reason to use those a-bombs. But what if you could end a major war that will kill millions by using it to take out say Germany before they could even start, would that be morally acceptable?

A preemptive strike with an atomic bomb? damned.gif Hell no. How could it be morally acceptable to kill millions of people to save millions of people? Besides, the majority of people in any country doesn't want war, the warmongers and their financiers do. And they're not bound by national borders.

You wouldn't be able to bomb 100k to save tens of millions

The one thing that Stalin said that was true about man was that "1 death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic"
02-23-2014, 12:54 AM #20
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
Interesting listen........

Show 42 - (BLITZ) Logical Insanity
After many listener requests, Dan examines the issue of the morality of dropping the Atomic Bombs in the Second World War. As usual, he does so in his own unique, unexpected way.

http://podbay.fm/show/173001861/e/133325...utostart=1
02-23-2014, 01:06 AM #21
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,279 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
In the end, I do believe the bomb hastened the end of the war, but that only worked then, and will never work again.
Most of the major players have similar weapons.
If in the present era, any nuke that goes off could subsequently lead to an extinction level event, as if Fukushima isn't enough to have on our collective plates.

wonder.gif
02-23-2014, 01:16 AM #22
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-23-2014, 01:06 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  In the end, I do believe the bomb hastened the end of the war, but that only worked then, and will never work again.
Most of the major players have similar weapons.
If in the present era, any nuke that goes off could subsequently lead to an extinction level event, as if Fukushima isn't enough to have on our collective plates.

Yep the question I asked you have to think of it from the 1945 POV not today's. Today the idea is insane back then though it was logical to end the war.

The only way to objectively look at history is to put yourself in their shoes for example the "red scare" had fathers building bomb shelters in their backyard which sounds insane but at the time to the man building it the idea was totally logical.
02-23-2014, 01:19 AM #23
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
These podcasts are fascinating definitely shït they didnt teach me in school

http://podbay.fm/show/173001861
02-23-2014, 01:24 AM #24
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,279 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
On some things it's impossible to put yourself in others shoes without a full lobotomy.

Quote:Imagine you are a scientist. In 1958 there is a big discovery – some of the very first satellites launched by the United States discover the Van Allen radiation belts. Over the next couple of years they are further studied and characterized by more satellites.
So imagine that you are a scientist, and there are no nuclear proliferation or testing bans in place yet. What’s the next thing you would do? Perhaps you would launch a nuclear bomb into space and try blowing up the belts, just to see what would happen. 13.gif wtf2.gif That, in essence, was the Starfish Prime project, which is described in vivid detail in the following video:



More here: http://blogs.howstuffworks.com/brainstuf...r-science/

wonder.gif
02-23-2014, 01:31 AM #25
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(02-23-2014, 01:24 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  On some things it's impossible to put yourself in others shoes without a full lobotomy.

Quote:Imagine you are a scientist. In 1958 there is a big discovery – some of the very first satellites launched by the United States discover the Van Allen radiation belts. Over the next couple of years they are further studied and characterized by more satellites.
So imagine that you are a scientist, and there are no nuclear proliferation or testing bans in place yet. What’s the next thing you would do? Perhaps you would launch a nuclear bomb into space and try blowing up the belts, just to see what would happen. 13.gif wtf2.gif That, in essence, was the Starfish Prime project, which is described in vivid detail in the following video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZoic9vg1fw

More here: http://blogs.howstuffworks.com/brainstuf...r-science/

That seems like a bad idea kinda like the corvair 13.gif
02-24-2014, 02:14 AM #26
Wicked Oblivion Member
Posts:10,776 Threads:720 Joined:Oct 2012
(02-22-2014, 11:07 PM)Below Average Genius Wrote:  Long after WWII in the 50's and early '60's the estimates are that between 40 and 70 million Chinese were murdered by the the Chinese government in furtherance of Mao's Five Year Plans either at the end of a gun or through starvation.

Since then students in college could be seen wearing Mao tee shirts probably clueless as to what an evil narcissistic monster he was.
And the Chinese people were so brainwashed and enslaved they use to praise and idolize that evil bastard Mao and his equally sicko and influential wife Jiang Qing when they were still alive and in power despite their paranoid genocidal policies just like Mao and Stalin are still highly praised by millions upon millions of people because the demented cult of personality lives on and on and on...




Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com