#Login Register


  • 14 Vote(s) - 2.93 Average
Home 


NASA mulls plan to drag asteroid into moon’s orbit
01-04-2013, 04:27 PM #1
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
January 4, 2013 – SPACE - Who says NASA has lost interest in the moon? Along with rumors of a hovering lunar base, there are reports that the agency is considering a proposal to capture an asteroid and drag it into the moon’s orbit. Researchers with the Keck Institute for Space Studies in California have confirmed that NASA is mulling over their plan to build a robotic spacecraft to grab a small asteroid and place it in high lunar orbit. The mission would cost about $2.6 billion – slightly more than NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover – and could be completed by the 2020s. For now, NASA’s only official plans for human spaceflight involve sending a crewed capsule, called Orion, around the moon. The Obama administration has said it also wants to send astronauts to a near-Earth asteroid. One proposed target, chosen because of its scientific value and favorable launch windows for a rendezvous, is a space rock called 1999 AO10. The mission would take about half a year, exposing astronauts to long-term radiation beyond Earth’s protective magnetic field and taking them beyond the reach of any possible rescue. Robotically bringing an asteroid to the moon instead would be a more attractive first step, the Keck researchers conclude, because an object orbiting the moon would be in easier reach of robotic probes and maybe even humans.

read more: http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.c...ons-orbit/

01-04-2013, 04:33 PM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,572 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
What could possibly go wrong? damned.gif
01-04-2013, 04:45 PM #3
KILLUMINATI Made Ya Look!!
Posts:4,764 Threads:1,046 Joined:Jun 2012
(01-04-2013, 04:33 PM)Octo Wrote:  What could possibly go wrong? damned.gif


nothing its fine.....................only death
01-04-2013, 04:56 PM #4
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,262 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Excellent Idea. Hats off to NASA lets drag another object into earth orbit they "pretend" to visit. chuckle.gif
They can't leave earths lower orbit. The radiation would fry them, don't care what anyone says we never went to the moon.

wonder.gif
01-05-2013, 12:32 AM #5
smart-ass Member
Posts:281 Threads:26 Joined:Jul 2012
(01-04-2013, 04:33 PM)Octo Wrote:  What could possibly go wrong? damned.gif
2 male asternauts go up in space straight come back to earth flaming queens with assteroids

Beware of the booger eater he'snot full uhoh.gif
01-05-2013, 12:42 AM #6
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,262 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
scream.gif

lmao2.gif

wonder.gif
01-05-2013, 12:44 AM #7
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,572 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
If they'd do a Felix Baumgartner on the way down they'd immediately grow a new set of man balls.

İmage
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
01-05-2013, 01:01 AM #8
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(01-04-2013, 04:56 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  Excellent Idea. Hats off to NASA lets drag another object into earth orbit they "pretend" to visit. chuckle.gif
They can't leave earths lower orbit. The radiation would fry them, don't care what anyone says we never went to the moon.


To say we never went would be erroneous. Perhaps all official trips to the moon were false productions but that does not mean we have not been and cannot go there.

There are several approaches to shielding a craft from that radiation and there are large holes at the poles where you could get around the radiation belt.

They say so much lead shielding would do the trick but it is too heavy... well there are certain super dense "alien" elements that also provide this kind of protection in a thin layer and ways of artificially reducing the weight of a craft. Supposedly some of our more advanced stealth craft use these coatings.

So don't go thinking we never went to the moon just because it can't be accomplished with officially accepted conventional technological means ...the Nazi's were supposedly able to accomplish it back in the 40's with rocket assisted vril craft. Which I have no doubt the fields of which would repel the radiation ...but then again it is all just quaky conspiracy stuff to the common minded people.
01-05-2013, 01:40 AM #9
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,262 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
That's a totally different line of technology, and I agree 100%. Certainly didn't happen in the manner which was İmage

wonder.gif
JollyRoger Show this Post
01-05-2013, 02:58 AM #10
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
(01-04-2013, 04:33 PM)Octo Wrote:  What could possibly go wrong? damned.gif


01-05-2013, 03:02 AM #11
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,572 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
Actually everything besides the stuff nobody thought of.
JollyRoger Show this Post
01-05-2013, 03:48 AM #12
JollyRoger Incognito Anonymous
 
But my question is "WHY"?

What purpose is there in creating a Moon for the Moon?

What?.... Are they gonna start exporting ocean water to the
moon?




Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com