#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Napolitano Grilled Over Fast and Furious: Never spoke with Holder about it
10-27-2011, 01:20 PM #1
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,343 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Quote:House Republicans on Wednesday turned their sharp questioning over "Operation Fast and Furious" toward Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who acknowledged her agents were twice told to "stand down" in deference to what she called a "very troublesome" operation.

Napolitano, at one point likening the questioning to a cross-examination, said repeatedly she only learned of "Fast and Furious" after Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed in December. She emphasized the operation, conceived and run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, "was an ATF operation," under the auspices of the Justice Department, not her department.

Napolitano said she has never spoken with Attorney General Eric Holder about "Fast and Furious," a revelation Republicans strongly criticized.

"There needs to be better communication, so somebody can say, 'Whoa! This is a crazy idea, you're giving guns to drug smugglers that are going to come back and be used?" said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/...z1byWUMYoO

Okay now lets get this straight, all these post 911 billions spent on getting agency's to share "intelligence" information has been obviously pissed away according to Napolitano's testimony. They are according to her at least not talking to each other.

Business as usual, one could come to the conclusion they are not really worried about any terrorists, so other than spying on innocent citizens with no warrant and creating a giant police state what ARE they doing with all that cash? Big sis and Holder don't even talk on the phone?

To compound matters, low level ATF agents supposedly concocted this gun running scheme with no knowledge from their superiors?

Right, and pigs fly. vic.gif Sorry, I don NOT believe they are being honest, and in fact are behaving like the very definition of domestic terrorists they want to put away and assassinate. I guess there are two sets of laws at work here and government officials are exempt from the rules of conduct average citizens are expected to adhere to.

Do as we say not as we do, you have the right to do exactly as you are told.

wonder.gif
10-27-2011, 03:35 PM #2
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,733 Threads:641 Joined:Feb 2011
(10-27-2011, 01:20 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  
Quote:House Republicans on Wednesday turned their sharp questioning over "Operation Fast and Furious" toward Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who acknowledged her agents were twice told to "stand down" in deference to what she called a "very troublesome" operation.

Napolitano, at one point likening the questioning to a cross-examination, said repeatedly she only learned of "Fast and Furious" after Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed in December. She emphasized the operation, conceived and run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, "was an ATF operation," under the auspices of the Justice Department, not her department.

Napolitano said she has never spoken with Attorney General Eric Holder about "Fast and Furious," a revelation Republicans strongly criticized.

"There needs to be better communication, so somebody can say, 'Whoa! This is a crazy idea, you're giving guns to drug smugglers that are going to come back and be used?" said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/...z1byWUMYoO

Okay now lets get this straight, all these post 911 billions spent on getting agency's to share "intelligence" information has been obviously pissed away according to Napolitano's testimony. They are according to her at least not talking to each other.

Business as usual, one could come to the conclusion they are not really worried about any terrorists, so other than spying on innocent citizens with no warrant and creating a giant police state what ARE they doing with all that cash? Big sis and Holder don't even talk on the phone?

To compound matters, low level ATF agents supposedly concocted this gun running scheme with no knowledge from their superiors?

Right, and pigs fly. vic.gif Sorry, I don NOT believe they are being honest, and in fact are behaving like the very definition of domestic terrorists they want to put away and assassinate. I guess there are two sets of laws at work here and government officials are exempt from the rules of conduct average citizens are expected to adhere to.

Do as we say not as we do, you have the right to do exactly as you are told.

It wouldn't surprise me if they were not communicating. Different bureaus and even different departments of each bureau are notorious for not communicating. They simply don't trust each other to keep quiet and no amount of money can buy trust.

.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
10-27-2011, 03:46 PM #3
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,343 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Just proves the Bush plan for inter agency communications and intelligence sharing was a fail. Obama stuck with the program against all election promises & everything he's touched has turned to fail as well.

wonder.gif
10-27-2011, 03:56 PM #4
Shadow Mrs. Buckwheat
Posts:12,782 Threads:1,182 Joined:Feb 2011
Check out this little gem...

A Mexican drug suspect awaiting trial in Chicago is making a startling claim. He insists he can't be prosecuted because he worked as an informant and had a secret immunity deal with the U.S. government.

Prosecutors say Vicente Zambada-Niebla oversaw drug running on a massive scale into the U.S. But now, from behind bars at a maximum security prison in Chicago, he's making his own explosive accusations -- that U.S. government agents have been aiding Mexico's infamous Sinaloa cartel -- even tipping off leaders on how to avoid capture.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500202_162-2...-immunity/

coffeetime.gif

10-27-2011, 08:32 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,803 Threads:1,471 Joined:Feb 2011
Nice little biscuit you whipped out for the afternoon tea there Shadow coffeetime.gif

Quote:Jordan told CBS News, "We do not have the power to offer immunity."

But in court documents, prosecutors do admit the U.S. had a signed cooperation agreement with a different Sinaloa cartel leader.
10-28-2011, 12:11 AM #6
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,343 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Man Shadow, this shït is getting juicy. I've notice most discussion forums have been oddly silent on this.

wonder.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com