#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
Home 


No post-birth abortion
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 03:33 PM #46
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 03:27 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  because some places have legalised gay marriage has no connection to your concept that there is such a thing as post abortion going on.. nor has it anything to do with 18 being the normal adult age internationally..

who has said that they are proposing infantcide??


1. Adulthood in the USA is 21 for drinking, but it used to be 21 for everything.

2. Same Sex marriage, government regulation of businesses, and social security and pre-birth abortion, and healthcare, in the USA, comes from the same source, that also provides dangerous criminals free to roam the streets, street drugs being made legal, and now, "jokes" about infantcide.

There are two australian philosophers who made the reference to infantcide, now some on the extreme left, are pushing for eugenics, including infantcide.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 03:37 PM #47
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 03:27 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  because some places have legalised gay marriage has no connection to your concept that there is such a thing as post abortion going on.. nor has it anything to do with 18 being the normal adult age internationally..

who has said that they are proposing infantcide??

In the USA, we have a two party system, Democrats and Republicans, we are a republic, you get to choose which politicians you want to vote for, from each party...

You dont get to choose the law....

Only the politicians get to choose the law...


so when you vote for somebody on healthcare, in the USA, you're voting democrat...

which means that you're also welcoming their garbage too.

I can't say, I'll take healthcare, and I'll have the criminals locked up, and I think I'll stop the legalization of murder...

You can only vote for the politician, which means you vote for EVERYTHING the politician does, without your consent.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 03:40 PM #48
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
and under a narrow system, like a two party system... within a republic form of government, there is no room, for jokes.
06-27-2013, 03:40 PM #49
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(06-27-2013, 03:33 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 03:27 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  because some places have legalised gay marriage has no connection to your concept that there is such a thing as post abortion going on.. nor has it anything to do with 18 being the normal adult age internationally..

who has said that they are proposing infantcide??


1. Adulthood in the USA is 21 for drinking, but it used to be 21 for everything.

2. Same Sex marriage, government regulation of businesses, and social security and pre-birth abortion, and healthcare, in the USA, comes from the same source, that also provides dangerous criminals free to roam the streets, street drugs being made legal, and now, "jokes" about infantcide.

There are two australian philosophers who made the reference to infantcide, now some on the extreme left, are pushing for eugenics, including infantcide.


but they will send 18 yearolds to die in a war?

they should legalise street drugs, they should create a decent, free healthcare for everyone in the USA..

we are all being poisoned by our environment, food, vaccines etc etc.. i just dont think they are doing this post abortion thing you are going on about..
06-27-2013, 03:42 PM #50
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(06-27-2013, 03:40 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  and under a narrow system, like a two party system... within a republic form of government, there is no room, for jokes.


well people on this site have a sense of humour, so expect jokes..
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:04 PM #51
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 03:42 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 03:40 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  and under a narrow system, like a two party system... within a republic form of government, there is no room, for jokes.


well people on this site have a sense of humour, so expect jokes..



In America, Both Liberals and Conservatives have a monopoly market for a political party in the usa..

There is only one liberal party, and one Conservative party, and they are entrenched in war, there is no middle ground,

the middle ground is the "No Man's Land"...

Todays jokes, end up as tommorow's disasters.

unfortunately.

Im sorry, but thats the way things are here.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:13 PM #52
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 03:42 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 03:40 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  and under a narrow system, like a two party system... within a republic form of government, there is no room, for jokes.


well people on this site have a sense of humour, so expect jokes..


what country are you from ?
06-27-2013, 06:25 PM #53
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
(06-27-2013, 01:25 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:23 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:18 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  The term infant is typically applied to young children between the ages of 1 month and 12 months, I don't see it happening either.

Besides, why would that be such a moral issue when there doesn't seem to be a problem with bombing infants in other countries into oblivion...


by your avatar, you look like a drunken wh0re to me


winslow she wasnt being mean in her reply.. so your calling her a whore is really unnecessary.. grow the fu*k up.. post shite and we will respond with wtf comments..


yes she is, she's advocating killing infants after birth


Oh FFS! This thread lmao.giflmao.giflmao.gif

Where the hell did you get the idea I was advocating killing infants after birth you dumb extremist fucktard bigot.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:32 PM #54
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 06:25 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:25 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:23 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:18 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  The term infant is typically applied to young children between the ages of 1 month and 12 months, I don't see it happening either.

Besides, why would that be such a moral issue when there doesn't seem to be a problem with bombing infants in other countries into oblivion...


by your avatar, you look like a drunken wh0re to me


winslow she wasnt being mean in her reply.. so your calling her a whore is really unnecessary.. grow the fu*k up.. post shite and we will respond with wtf comments..


yes she is, she's advocating killing infants after birth


Oh FFS! This thread lmao.giflmao.giflmao.gif

Where the hell did you get the idea I was advocating killing infants after birth you dumb extremist fucktard bigot.


and how am I an extremist, or a bigot, for trying to protect kids against being murdered after birth ?
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:39 PM #55
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 06:25 PM)Octo Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:25 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:23 PM)the white ribbon Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:18 PM)Winslow22 Wrote:  
(06-27-2013, 01:06 PM)Octo Wrote:  The term infant is typically applied to young children between the ages of 1 month and 12 months, I don't see it happening either.

Besides, why would that be such a moral issue when there doesn't seem to be a problem with bombing infants in other countries into oblivion...


by your avatar, you look like a drunken wh0re to me


winslow she wasnt being mean in her reply.. so your calling her a whore is really unnecessary.. grow the fu*k up.. post shite and we will respond with wtf comments..


yes she is, she's advocating killing infants after birth


Oh FFS! This thread lmao.giflmao.giflmao.gif

Where the hell did you get the idea I was advocating killing infants after birth you dumb extremist fucktard bigot.


Killing is not the answer to a problem of inconvenience of being a mom, after the kid no longer relies on your body to keep HIM OR HER alive.

Its not your body, and there is no "womans right to choose" after birth, because its no longer inside YOU.

There is no self defense, what threat does a baby pose ? none, whatsoever.

its a human being, and executing minors, (a newborn baby is a minor), executing minors, is illegal, and so is executing the innocent...

and it damn sure is against the law, to execute people without due process of the law, the signature of one person, YOU, is without due process of the law.
06-27-2013, 06:41 PM #56
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,612 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
For accepting deaths of infants as "things that happen in war" and "not allowing" your country to be judged by that.

Ok then. lmao.gif

I have absolutely no idea what you're ranting about, we have pretty clear laws regarding abortions in my country and there's no such thing as killing infants in the abortion debate. In fact there is no debate on the matter over here.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:48 PM #57
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 06:41 PM)Octo Wrote:  For accepting deaths of infants as "things that happen in war" and "not allowing" your country to be judged by that.

Ok then. lmao.gif

I have absolutely no idea what you're ranting about, we have pretty clear laws regarding abortions in my country and there's no such thing as killing infants in the abortion debate. In fact there is no debate on the matter over here.


in the USA, there is this notion, that this is some kind of a free ğkkin' country where people can do whatever they please, and serve themselves, whatever the cost is to somebody else.


and its not an Americanism to kill babies, its two Australian Philosophers, who have no medical backrgound, who have been debunked here in America...

that came up with the idea that killing newborns, is no different than killing fetuses.

no medical expertise agrees with it.


babies have no voice, somebody has to stand up for them.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:51 PM #58
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 06:41 PM)Octo Wrote:  For accepting deaths of infants as "things that happen in war" and "not allowing" your country to be judged by that.

Ok then. lmao.gif

I have absolutely no idea what you're ranting about, we have pretty clear laws regarding abortions in my country and there's no such thing as killing infants in the abortion debate. In fact there is no debate on the matter over here.



and no, I will not answer charges, of killing my enemy, who happened to be a child armed with an AK-47 machine gun..

no I will not answer the charges of killing people who refused to evacuate, knowing they have no chance in HELL, of winning the war.

My job is to defend the United States, and thats it... not to protect foreign people.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 06:59 PM #59
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 06:41 PM)Octo Wrote:  For accepting deaths of infants as "things that happen in war" and "not allowing" your country to be judged by that.

Ok then. lmao.gif

I have absolutely no idea what you're ranting about, we have pretty clear laws regarding abortions in my country and there's no such thing as killing infants in the abortion debate. In fact there is no debate on the matter over here.


My kids need me,

if their country needed their kids so bad, they wouldnt send their teenagers, and children and old men, and women to fight the United States' Abrams tanks and British Challenger 2s, and Bradley IFVs, and 50 caliber machine guns.

and blackhawks and apaches.

and god knows what else, like the leopard 2 A4, A5, A6, and the PzH2000 howitzers.
Winslow22 Show this Post
06-27-2013, 07:22 PM #60
Winslow22 Incognito Anonymous
 
(06-27-2013, 06:41 PM)Octo Wrote:  For accepting deaths of infants as "things that happen in war" and "not allowing" your country to be judged by that.

Ok then. lmao.gif

I have absolutely no idea what you're ranting about, we have pretty clear laws regarding abortions in my country and there's no such thing as killing infants in the abortion debate. In fact there is no debate on the matter over here.


here in America, the abortion debate is raging, and its getting worse and worse and worse, thats thr problem



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com