#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


OOPS: Rebels Were Storing Chemical Weapons and Syrian Jets Hit Warehouse!
04-09-2017, 11:47 AM #1
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,279 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Why else would victims show evidence of exposure to multiple poison gases?
Call us crazy but that would be perfectly consistent with the explanation the Russians provided initially (and US dismissed out of hand): that Khan Shaikhun was a storehouse for rebel chemical weapons that was hit by conventional explosive bombs by the Syrian army.

Read more: russia-insider.com

This is the first explanation I've heard that makes any damn sense whatsoever.
I can't get my head around Assad being a monster.

wonder.gif
04-09-2017, 11:49 AM #2
Strigoi Member
Posts:684 Threads:44 Joined:Mar 2011
damned.gif uh oh, if true that's really poor, and yes that does make sense JR.

Un Strigoi printre noi
04-09-2017, 12:07 PM #3
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,606 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
It has been done before damned.gif

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/16/wa...-attack-2/
Quote:In late August 2013, the Obama administration lurched to the brink of invading Syria after blaming a Sarin gas attack outside Damascus on President Bashar al-Assad’s government, but evidence reported by investigative journalist Seymour M. Hersh implicates Turkish intelligence and extremist Syrian rebels instead.
04-09-2017, 12:33 PM #4
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,279 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
yup.gif In leiu of past intel debacles, this leaves me wondering if any of this is right.

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-09-2017, 12:55 PM #5
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
damned.gif
04-09-2017, 01:06 PM #6
DaJavoo If looks could kilt
Posts:1,850 Threads:45 Joined:Mar 2011
I saw the same story yesterday by a Brit reporter.

It does make sense.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why Assad, who was beginning to reap a bit of approval not a week before the gas debacle ~ wtf would he jeopardize that hard-won commodity and the backing of Russia? It makes no sense.

What ever intelligence the U.S. had at its disposal must have been damn convincing. But, if this report has hard backing and decent evidence it will make Trump look worse than Obama.

Hard to say if more obfuscation is in order or if the 'warehouse' proven true, if the Donald ponies up reparations to salvage credibility. If he does, it would be the 1st time in human history.
04-09-2017, 02:00 PM #7
Sandy Incognito Anonymous
 
(04-09-2017, 01:06 PM)DaJavoo Wrote:  I saw the same story yesterday by a Brit reporter.

It does make sense.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why Assad, who was beginning to reap a bit of approval not a week before the gas debacle ~ wtf would he jeopardize that hard-won commodity and the backing of Russia?  It makes no sense.

İmage
04-09-2017, 02:03 PM #8
Sandy Incognito Anonymous
 
Dang images chuckle.gif

İmage

Is what I meant to post.
04-09-2017, 03:07 PM #9
Stiggy Member
Posts:279 Threads:25 Joined:Apr 2016
The former Ambassador to Syria said this is a FF.



I'm afraid this is is going to get really bad and Trump is threatening to hit them again.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-09-2017, 03:35 PM #10
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
This looks awfully bad. How many times has the intelligence community done this? At least Obama backed off the last time Assad was accused of chem weapons. This is very uncomfortable.
04-09-2017, 03:57 PM #11
Gumby AKA Chtumby
Posts:1,595 Threads:207 Joined:Mar 2013
Regardless of what the FACTS are, we are hearing 'Regime Change" from all the Key Players in the Administration.

This is going to get Interesting.


Don’t waste your time online, invest it with steemit.com
04-09-2017, 04:00 PM #12
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,279 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
(04-09-2017, 03:07 PM)Stiggy Wrote:  The former Ambassador to Syria said this is a FF.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU5taO5vRDo

I'm afraid this is is going to get really bad and Trump is threatening to hit them again.

Great find. Scary that troops may end up in that quagmire over a FF. 13.gif

wonder.gif
04-09-2017, 06:19 PM #13
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:8,256 Threads:191 Joined:Feb 2011
Situation arises ,,, serious
Talk doesn't add up
leaving all of us ,,,
very curious ,,,

Scene of the Crime
poisoned , is dumped in the Sea

Happens alot
Happens all the time
But don't rely on me

I'm just a Boy , not to smart

But I can tell the difference
between poison gas

and a Fart .
04-09-2017, 10:24 PM #14
Adde Member
Posts:535 Threads:44 Joined:Apr 2012
This is the only thing that puts the pieces together. No wonder the media suddenly loves him.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
04-11-2017, 07:53 AM #15
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(04-09-2017, 11:47 AM)JayRodney Wrote:  Why else would victims show evidence of exposure to multiple poison gases?
Call us crazy but that would be perfectly consistent with the explanation the Russians provided initially (and US dismissed out of hand): that Khan Shaikhun was a storehouse for rebel chemical weapons that was hit by conventional explosive bombs by the Syrian army.

Read more: russia-insider.com

This is the first explanation I've heard that makes any damn sense whatsoever.
I can't get my head around Assad being a monster.

"That's what they want you to think."

It takes a special kind of dumb to believe that when a side is winning they'd resort to outrageous tactics...but after all this is the matrix duality where there is no good or evil it just is.

I'm obligated to say there is no good or evil in the matrix but I'm also obligated to say that it is not of GOD, GOD doesn't make corrupt environments so...demiurge.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com