#Login Register


  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Home 


Pyramids are way old!
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
10-24-2017, 05:00 PM #1
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 


10-24-2017, 05:36 PM #2
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
I have a lot of time on my hands today because hubby had to use my car and I'm puttering and I skipped through that 3 hour video in a few minutes.

Anyway, I get the gist, and as for the pyramids being way old and there being an advanced civilization way back, I kinda think 'no'. Because look how far we have come technologically within a few decades and if our civilizations around the world were to be extinguished all this technology would become archaeological evidence in the future if and when man reaches another higher level to where we are now.

Quote:Carbon dating was performed in 1984 as well as 1995 and they clarified that as you go into the pyramids you start getting abnormal dates, centuries earlier before the outer layer... never discussed. This proves the pyramids were not built all at once but reworked. the dating merely dates the FINAL time of rework which was about 2500 BC. Underneath the Khufu pyramid especially we see a strange layer of bedrock. Guess what, the Great Sphinx and also tomb of Khentkawes would ALSO be described as 'bedrock' since that is basically what it is, carved out of the Giza plateau. This is where I get the 10k year old date, for the structure under the Giza pyramid if we take into consideration geological erosion.

Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
10-24-2017, 08:06 PM #3
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
Carbon dating is unreliable. But what we do know is the sphinx and other EARLY features around Egypt show WATER EROSION. We also know that area has been a desert for at least 5 thousand years.

We also know that the OLDEST structures in Egypt are the most advanced and contruction got more crude as time when on. The Egyptians themselves document pharaohs going back 25,000 years.

You shouldn't skim around to get 'the gist' but listen to this in its entirety from the half hour mark on when the guest comes on the show. You might learn something




(10-24-2017, 05:36 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I have a lot of time on my hands today because hubby had to use my car and I'm puttering and I skipped through that 3 hour video in a few minutes.

Anyway, I get the gist, and as for the pyramids being way old and there being an advanced civilization way back, I kinda think 'no'. Because look how far we have come technologically within a few decades and if our civilizations around the world were to be extinguished all this technology would become archaeological evidence in the future if and when man reaches another higher level to where we are now.

Quote:Carbon dating was performed in 1984 as well as 1995 and they clarified that as you go into the pyramids you start getting abnormal dates, centuries earlier before the outer layer... never discussed. This proves the pyramids were not built all at once but reworked. the dating merely dates the FINAL time of rework which was about 2500 BC. Underneath the Khufu pyramid especially we see a strange layer of bedrock. Guess what, the Great Sphinx and also tomb of Khentkawes would ALSO be described as 'bedrock' since that is basically what it is, carved out of the Giza plateau. This is where I get the 10k year old date, for the structure under the Giza pyramid if we take into consideration geological erosion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4YKGssX0A
10-24-2017, 08:15 PM #4
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
(10-24-2017, 08:06 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Carbon dating is unreliable.   But what we do know is the sphinx and other EARLY features around Egypt show WATER EROSION.   We also know that area has been a desert for at least 5 thousand years.  

We also know that the OLDEST structures in Egypt are the most advanced and contruction got more crude as time when on. The Egyptians themselves document pharaohs going back 25,000 years.  

You shouldn't skim around to get 'the gist' but listen to this in its entirety from the half hour mark on when the guest comes on the show.  You might learn something



(10-24-2017, 05:36 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I have a lot of time on my hands today because hubby had to use my car and I'm puttering and I skipped through that 3 hour video in a few minutes.

Anyway, I get the gist, and as for the pyramids being way old and there being an advanced civilization way back, I kinda think 'no'. Because look how far we have come technologically within a few decades and if our civilizations around the world were to be extinguished all this technology would become archaeological evidence in the future if and when man reaches another higher level to where we are now.

Quote:Carbon dating was performed in 1984 as well as 1995 and they clarified that as you go into the pyramids you start getting abnormal dates, centuries earlier before the outer layer... never discussed. This proves the pyramids were not built all at once but reworked. the dating merely dates the FINAL time of rework which was about 2500 BC. Underneath the Khufu pyramid especially we see a strange layer of bedrock. Guess what, the Great Sphinx and also tomb of Khentkawes would ALSO be described as 'bedrock' since that is basically what it is, carved out of the Giza plateau. This is where I get the 10k year old date, for the structure under the Giza pyramid if we take into consideration geological erosion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4YKGssX0A

Thanks for the advice, but I don't watch one vid or read one person's hypothesis and go with it, rather I like to delve into peer reviews and others' research too. You should too, you may also learn something.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-p...ypt-008973
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
10-24-2017, 10:00 PM #5
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(10-24-2017, 08:15 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(10-24-2017, 08:06 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Carbon dating is unreliable.   But what we do know is the sphinx and other EARLY features around Egypt show WATER EROSION.   We also know that area has been a desert for at least 5 thousand years.  

We also know that the OLDEST structures in Egypt are the most advanced and contruction got more crude as time when on. The Egyptians themselves document pharaohs going back 25,000 years.  

You shouldn't skim around to get 'the gist' but listen to this in its entirety from the half hour mark on when the guest comes on the show.  You might learn something



(10-24-2017, 05:36 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I have a lot of time on my hands today because hubby had to use my car and I'm puttering and I skipped through that 3 hour video in a few minutes.

Anyway, I get the gist, and as for the pyramids being way old and there being an advanced civilization way back, I kinda think 'no'. Because look how far we have come technologically within a few decades and if our civilizations around the world were to be extinguished all this technology would become archaeological evidence in the future if and when man reaches another higher level to where we are now.

Quote:Carbon dating was performed in 1984 as well as 1995 and they clarified that as you go into the pyramids you start getting abnormal dates, centuries earlier before the outer layer... never discussed. This proves the pyramids were not built all at once but reworked. the dating merely dates the FINAL time of rework which was about 2500 BC. Underneath the Khufu pyramid especially we see a strange layer of bedrock. Guess what, the Great Sphinx and also tomb of Khentkawes would ALSO be described as 'bedrock' since that is basically what it is, carved out of the Giza plateau. This is where I get the 10k year old date, for the structure under the Giza pyramid if we take into consideration geological erosion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4YKGssX0A

Thanks for the advice, but I don't watch one vid or read one person's hypothesis and go with it, rather I like to delve into peer reviews and others' research too. You should too, you may also learn something.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-p...ypt-008973

me either. you must use common sense and corroborate material from several sources. One of the experts referenced in the article you just sent is the person who is interviewed in the OP. lol Robert Schoch

http://www.robertschoch.com/
10-24-2017, 10:28 PM #6
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,354 Threads:435 Joined:Jun 2012
(10-24-2017, 10:00 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(10-24-2017, 08:15 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(10-24-2017, 08:06 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Carbon dating is unreliable.   But what we do know is the sphinx and other EARLY features around Egypt show WATER EROSION.   We also know that area has been a desert for at least 5 thousand years.  

We also know that the OLDEST structures in Egypt are the most advanced and contruction got more crude as time when on. The Egyptians themselves document pharaohs going back 25,000 years.  

You shouldn't skim around to get 'the gist' but listen to this in its entirety from the half hour mark on when the guest comes on the show.  You might learn something



(10-24-2017, 05:36 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I have a lot of time on my hands today because hubby had to use my car and I'm puttering and I skipped through that 3 hour video in a few minutes.

Anyway, I get the gist, and as for the pyramids being way old and there being an advanced civilization way back, I kinda think 'no'. Because look how far we have come technologically within a few decades and if our civilizations around the world were to be extinguished all this technology would become archaeological evidence in the future if and when man reaches another higher level to where we are now.

Quote:Carbon dating was performed in 1984 as well as 1995 and they clarified that as you go into the pyramids you start getting abnormal dates, centuries earlier before the outer layer... never discussed. This proves the pyramids were not built all at once but reworked. the dating merely dates the FINAL time of rework which was about 2500 BC. Underneath the Khufu pyramid especially we see a strange layer of bedrock. Guess what, the Great Sphinx and also tomb of Khentkawes would ALSO be described as 'bedrock' since that is basically what it is, carved out of the Giza plateau. This is where I get the 10k year old date, for the structure under the Giza pyramid if we take into consideration geological erosion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4YKGssX0A

Thanks for the advice, but I don't watch one vid or read one person's hypothesis and go with it, rather I like to delve into peer reviews and others' research too. You should too, you may also learn something.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-p...ypt-008973

me either.  you must use common sense and corroborate material from several sources.   One of the experts referenced in the article you just sent is the person who is interviewed in the OP. lol Robert Schoch

http://www.robertschoch.com/

Yes, I know and his peers in the article I posted are pish poshing his hypothesis.
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
10-24-2017, 11:01 PM #7
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
(10-24-2017, 10:28 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(10-24-2017, 10:00 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  
(10-24-2017, 08:15 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  
(10-24-2017, 08:06 PM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  Carbon dating is unreliable.   But what we do know is the sphinx and other EARLY features around Egypt show WATER EROSION.   We also know that area has been a desert for at least 5 thousand years.  

We also know that the OLDEST structures in Egypt are the most advanced and contruction got more crude as time when on. The Egyptians themselves document pharaohs going back 25,000 years.  

You shouldn't skim around to get 'the gist' but listen to this in its entirety from the half hour mark on when the guest comes on the show.  You might learn something



(10-24-2017, 05:36 PM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  I have a lot of time on my hands today because hubby had to use my car and I'm puttering and I skipped through that 3 hour video in a few minutes.

Anyway, I get the gist, and as for the pyramids being way old and there being an advanced civilization way back, I kinda think 'no'. Because look how far we have come technologically within a few decades and if our civilizations around the world were to be extinguished all this technology would become archaeological evidence in the future if and when man reaches another higher level to where we are now.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x4YKGssX0A

Thanks for the advice, but I don't watch one vid or read one person's hypothesis and go with it, rather I like to delve into peer reviews and others' research too. You should too, you may also learn something.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-p...ypt-008973

me either.  you must use common sense and corroborate material from several sources.   One of the experts referenced in the article you just sent is the person who is interviewed in the OP. lol Robert Schoch

http://www.robertschoch.com/

Yes, I know and his peers in the article I posted are pish poshing his hypothesis.

pish poshing? dunno.gif
10-25-2017, 12:04 AM #8
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:9,876 Threads:223 Joined:Feb 2011
I have been beneath your feet , wherein lay the remnants of a Civilization , That Conclusively was far advanced
in the Natural Science Venue .

an Anti Gravitational device hovered there , a Ball shaped Object about the size of a Basketball ,
I spun it , it generated light which Illuminated the entire Cavern .

walking up a low set of Steps crafted of hand laid flat stones , and through a hand carved door way ,
I entered another section of the Cave system , another Door way at the far end of that " Room " led into a Tunnel
which traversed the entire Mountain Range .

Just to the Left of the Tunnel Entrance , in situ , stood a dark triangular shaped Air Craft .

In examination of the Artifacts which the dating of , as well as the various Civilizations , wide spread in distance and time ,
were collected and deposited in this Repository ,
I determined That this Planet had for many centuries prior to our KNOWN to us History , had gone through many
layers of rise and fall advancements in various cultures , various Technologies , various attributes .


The most dire question facing us at this exact moment , is whether we join those Dead Civilizations , by
Maintaining the same level of Conscious Perception they had , which caused their demise .

We are at a Pivotal Transition .

I have no Faith that we shall escape ourselves .
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
10-25-2017, 02:38 PM #9
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
spock.gif
10-25-2017, 03:47 PM #10
Ninelives Singing In The Rain
Posts:2,803 Threads:42 Joined:Feb 2016
(10-25-2017, 12:04 AM)Cynicalabsurdance Wrote:  I have been beneath your feet , wherein lay the remnants of a Civilization , That Conclusively was far advanced
in the Natural Science Venue .

an Anti Gravitational device hovered there , a Ball shaped Object about the size of a Basketball ,
I spun it , it generated light which Illuminated the entire Cavern .

walking up a low set of Steps crafted of hand laid flat stones , and through a hand carved door way ,
I entered another section of the Cave system , another Door way at the far end of that " Room " led into a Tunnel
which traversed the entire Mountain Range .

Just to the Left of the Tunnel Entrance , in situ , stood a dark triangular shaped Air Craft .

In examination of the Artifacts which the dating of , as well as the various Civilizations , wide spread in distance and time ,
were collected and deposited in this Repository ,
I determined That this Planet had for many centuries prior to our KNOWN to us History , had gone through many
layers of rise and fall advancements in various cultures , various Technologies , various attributes .


The most dire question facing us at this exact moment , is whether we join those Dead Civilizations , by
Maintaining the same level of Conscious Perception they had , which caused their demise .

We are at a Pivotal Transition .

I have no Faith that we shall escape ourselves .

So your the one that turned on the light, Thanks I was having a hard time seeing.

Look Up
10-25-2017, 09:45 PM #11
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:9,876 Threads:223 Joined:Feb 2011
Seems I've turned on a mass of lights .
ever wonder why it is , That I have such an extraordinary amount of first hand experiential Knowledge ?

I've Wondered .

plus the amount of my writings that have been removed from the Forums ?

check out what was just recently done to the webpage

rogersnow.atspace.com

Zap gone , every page but the Home Page , and even it was stripped clean .

Odd ?

Not to me .
10-25-2017, 09:46 PM #12
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:9,876 Threads:223 Joined:Feb 2011
shït , not even the link will stick

http://rogersnow.atspace.com/
10-26-2017, 03:06 AM #13
Fatima Incognito Anonymous
 
I don't understand why???
If they say life evolution all start from one single atom molecule cell and then slowly slowly evolve into millions of different species and human evolve from fish and fish become evolve into chicken and chicken become monkey and monkey become man and to evolve all this from one single cell atom....????....and it takes mlions and billions of years.... Then why is it possible after we human civilisation totally destroys itself and all life in the world...then how come we have new humans life and new animals in only 40000years and not billions of years??? I go crazy to think how this happen?? I mean 40000year ago dinosaurs only life in animals on planet... No chi hen no dogs no cow no sheep no humans... Then big disaster all life totally die in one moment.. Ok.. Very well no problem shït happens to everyone .. So if before dinosaurs take billions of years for life to evolve why after dinosaurs it takes only few thousand years for totally new species than ever before to evolve from nothing in only very few thousand years and not millions?? I very stressed confusion in my head from science no answer
10-26-2017, 01:35 PM #14
Strigoi Member
Posts:1,049 Threads:60 Joined:Mar 2011
blink.gif

Un Strigoi printre noi
10-27-2017, 06:17 PM #15
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:9,876 Threads:223 Joined:Feb 2011
well

ever think that maybe when the old Civilizations wiped their slate clean

new batches of people were brought here and dropped off .

Like a Planetary Open Air Prison .

like a Group of Planets decided to each dump their unsavory citizens here and let them
fight it out .

good idea actually , we should relocate a shitload of Earths assholes to Mars .

think of it that way , and you'd probably get the true answer on where Earthlings came from .



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com