#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Reknowned Artist Avoids Prison, For Abusing Children.
07-04-2013, 03:19 AM #1
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
Quote:An internationally renowned artist who avoided prison after being found guilty of a string of sex charges against children will see his sentence referred to the Court of Appeal for being unduly lenient, the Attorney General’s Office has said.

Graham Ovenden, from Cornwall, received 12 months’ imprisonment suspended for two years after he was convicted of six charges of indecency with a child and one allegation of indecent assault relating to three girls.

The Attorney General, Dominic Grieve QC MP, has decided to refer the 70-year-old’s case to the Court of Appeal where judges will decide whether or not to increase the sentence handed down by Judge Graham Cottle at Plymouth Crown Court in June.

A spokeswoman for the Attorney General’s Office said: 'Having carefully reviewed this case, the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve QC MP, has decided to refer the sentence of Graham Ovenden to the Court of Appeal for review.

'The case will in due course be heard by three Court of Appeal judges who will decide whether or not the sentence is unduly lenient and whether they should increase the sentence.'

Meanwhile it has emerged the Met Police are investigating claims that victims of Ovenden have been identified.

'Enquiries are underway and no arrests have been made,' a spokesman for the force said.
Victims and complainants of sexual offences are entitled to lifelong anonymity.

Ovenden, who studied under the so-called 'Godfather of Pop-Art' Sir Peter Blake, abused children as young as six who posed for his paintings in the 1970s and '80s.

The artwork - much celebrated in galleries across the world at the height of his commercial popularity - formed part of a ruse for abusing girls at his studio in Cornwall and former home in Hounslow, west London, where he would make them dress in Victorian clothing before removing it and committing indecent acts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ppeal.html

Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
07-04-2013, 04:42 AM #2
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
And where were these kids' parents?? What parent with half a brain in their head would allow a six year old alone with some man?
07-04-2013, 05:20 AM #3
Ruby Wolf Member
Posts:10,786 Threads:721 Joined:Oct 2012
So i'm assuming his talent and popularity brought him the fame and the fortune that he was able to avoid a prison sentence with by paying off crooked lawyers and two faced judges and its sure nice to live knowing that most people get railroaded into prison because they're too damn poor to buy their way out as prisons are places tptb dump and hurl out of sight and out of mind the undesirable elements of our sick society...
07-04-2013, 05:23 AM #4
Ruby Wolf Member
Posts:10,786 Threads:721 Joined:Oct 2012
(07-04-2013, 04:42 AM)Anonymous Kritter Wrote:  And where were these kids' parents?? What parent with half a brain in their head would allow a six year old alone with some man?

Just like the parents who allowed their children to be with michael jackson...

Gold diggers who intentionally place their children in harms way because they're warped and possessed by greed...



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com