#Login Register

  • 15 Vote(s) - 1.53 Average

Sex Robots - Good or bad?
07-08-2017, 03:27 PM #1
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,450 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
I've been reading the two sides of the argument. So it may boil down to this...

Sex robots that resemble children are to be banned. Of course, there will be a black market for them and it appears if one is in possession of one, that person may go to prison. Will a pedophile be satisfied with a child sex robot or want the real thing?

Frigid Farrah - resists all sexual advances, so this really is intended as a sexual game of rape (but it simply is masturbation). Will the rapist be satisfied with this way of gratifying himself/herself?

Female sex robots are more along the lines of a pornographic appearance, will this be akin to more of the same objectification of women as we now see in video games?

Then again, we have disabled, anxiety-ridden, early ejaculators, heartbroken, recovering from trauma souls who may find a sex robot to help ease them into exploring and/or gratifying themselves. Can these robots be therapeutic as well?

What say you kritters?

A sex doll with a switch to change to Frigid Farrah (rape doll) if desired:

Quote:The above can be understood better as rape – here the penetrated ‘object’ does have a consciousness (is a living human being), needs, desires and so forth, but they are not acknowledged and are used as a means to an end-sexual gratification. Objectification is a way of treating and relating to a human like they were an object. Objectification is integral to the commercial ‘sex’ (rape) trade where human bodies are bought, rented and exchanged for sex. By contrast, the penetration of an object, in this case a sex robot is masturbation, not sex, because the object is not a subjective being, with thoughts and feelings to be taken into account. This is the case no matter what fantasies the user projects onto the sex robot, and no matter how well the sex robot imitates some humanlike behaviours. There is flawed thinking behind the use of the terms ‘sex robot’ or ‘sex doll’.

Sex dolls or sex robots are not participating in any sex. Dolls and robots do not have sexed bodies which include reproductive organs, hormones and are not part of a living species. Dolls and robots are humanmade artefacts; commercial products (commodities) that are assembled together as property that can be bought and sold.

Sex dolls for therapy or further isolation?

Quote:But the authors warned that the march of sex robots raised serious moral and ethical questions which needed to be addressed. They warned that users could become socially isolated or even addicted to the machines which could never replace real human contact.

“It’s very sad because it’s going to be a one way relationship,” said Prof Sharkey.

“If people bond with robots it’s very worrying. You are loving an artefact that can’t love you back, and the best they can do is fake it.”

The report also warned of a ‘darker’ side to the industry in which companies were programming ‘shy’ or ‘reluctant’ personalities into their dolls so that users could feel they were forcing the robots to have sex. TrueCompanion’s robot Roxxxy Gold, for example, can be set to ‘Frigid Farah.’


For me, this technology (and other tech) seems to just further isolate people, but if these dolls can be used for therapeutic purposes, perhaps with supervision (or a doctor's monitoring), then I am all for it.
07-08-2017, 03:47 PM #2
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:30,201 Threads:1,487 Joined:Feb 2011
To each his own remarked the maiden as she kissed her cow.
I don't find it healthy to be turned on by inanimate objects, or anime as is the big thang in Japan.


07-08-2017, 03:54 PM #3
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,450 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
I suppose I am more for something that helps people get the sexual gratification we all need from time to time, such as the Orgasmatron booth in the Woody Allen movie "Sleepers".

By relieving the sexual urge at will, would it not stand to reason that one could then focus on other pursuits?
Random German Guy Show this Post
07-08-2017, 05:15 PM #4
Random German Guy Incognito Anonymous
Most countries won't let you marry anything made of plastic.
07-08-2017, 05:37 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:41,391 Threads:1,584 Joined:Feb 2011
I don't think it's a very healthy approach. Don't the lonely, disabled and older people long for human touch, to be close to another human, the intimacy? I'd think a hooker would be a better option than a robot

07-08-2017, 06:37 PM #6
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,450 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
Some feel by using a hooker, the human element, that they are contributing to their precarious life in that choice of work and perhaps abuse. I would think that some people that have had traumatic sexual experiences, they would not want the human element, perhaps AI could be a bridge of sorts (therapy)? Just throwing out ideas here.
07-08-2017, 06:37 PM #7
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,450 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
(07-08-2017, 05:15 PM)Random German Guy Wrote:  Most countries won't let you marry anything made of plastic.

Who said anything about marriage? We are talking sexual gratification and/or therapy.
07-09-2017, 04:06 AM #8
UniqueStranger Art in my heart
Posts:15,450 Threads:464 Joined:Jun 2012
07-09-2017, 08:15 AM #9
Fatima Incognito Anonymous
(07-09-2017, 04:06 AM)UniqueStranger Wrote:  Confused?

In my village in the old days especially under communism sex was very strict and totally tabooed
It was very hard and frustrating for young men in a village with few women they can't touch until wedding night
They spend all day in the Forrest tending to goats tied by their horns to stop them running off on the other side of the torrent
If the young me n ever get caught in the Forrest doing impure actions of any kind the elders would bash them up with sticks to get their libido back under control
Much the same alike to how the aboriginals used the spearing method of punishment when the elders would throw spears to the young men thru their legs
07-09-2017, 01:09 PM #10
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:41,391 Threads:1,584 Joined:Feb 2011
Are you like 500 years old or something? damned.gif
07-09-2017, 01:43 PM #11
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,599 Threads:80 Joined:Feb 2011
07-09-2017, 01:57 PM #12
Strigoi Diavolul
Posts:1,765 Threads:92 Joined:Mar 2011
Sounds like BS to me. bunker.gif

Un Strigoi printre noi
07-09-2017, 02:07 PM #13
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,599 Threads:80 Joined:Feb 2011
Well, hate me if you want to,
but where I am in life right now,
I wouldn't mind at all,

paying a hunnerd bucks to some
agreeable, soft spoken or silent
lady for a monthly visit or so
with 0 strings nor drama attached.

What is so bloody horrible about
that idea..?

She should most def control her
own business, though...no pimps,
no Mamas, no middle hands.
07-09-2017, 02:09 PM #14
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,599 Threads:80 Joined:Feb 2011
Or at least 6 times a year.

Or... 13.gif


You catch my drift anyway, I'm sure.
07-09-2017, 06:55 PM #15
Adde All in Moderation
Posts:837 Threads:55 Joined:Apr 2012
I'm uncertain how people get turned on by those rubber mannequins, it's not something that would interest me.



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com