#Login Register


  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Home 


Sheen matches Macondo well and could be from wreckage, Coast Guard says
10-11-2012, 03:53 PM #1
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
I don't see how this could happen from the well itself as cement was pumped into the well bore and intersecting well into the annulus then that pumped full of cement. Unless the process somehow fractured the formation (frack) accidentally and oil coming through the fractures or the cement job failed which is highly unlikely.

Guess there could be enough oil residual in the drilling riser to cause a sheen however I don't know why it would show up at this late date. Oil in that riser would not be effected by the corexit.

I'm wondering if all that oil at the bottom in those underwater canyons once effected by the Corexit is allowing the crude crud to reverse back to it's natural state allowing the release of a "sheen". I dunno, any Geo chemists or physicists here?

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/10/10/sheen...uard-says/

"Samples from a sheen in the area of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which exploded and sank more than two years ago, “correlates to oil that originated from BP’s Macondo well,” the Coast Guard said a statement Wednesday night.

The statement gave no indication of any active leak, but said: “The exact source of the sheen is uncertain at this time but could be residual oil associated with wreckage and/or debris left on the seabed from the Deepwater Horizon incident in 2010.”

The statement, from the office of the Federal On-Scene Coordinator, said the sheen – which was first reported to the National Response Center on Sept. 16 by BP and has varied in size, poses no risk to the shore and isn’t feasible to recover. It was approximately 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana.

The Coast Guard, in concert with BP and NOAA, has made assessments of the sheen by aircraft and boat since its discovery. Samples, the statement says, were taken by a Coast Guard unit on Sept. 26 and sent to the Coast Guard Marine Safety Lab in New London, Conn.

One or both of BP, which owned the well, and Transocean, which owned the Deepwater Horizon, may be sent a bill any costs associated with further assessments or operations related to the sheen, the statement said."
10-11-2012, 03:56 PM #2
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
Edit won't let me fix my error. Not tiny Chemists but Geo Chemists LoL
10-11-2012, 03:57 PM #3
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
Geo, wtf?
10-11-2012, 03:58 PM #4
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
What is wrong. G. e. o.
10-11-2012, 04:01 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,577 Threads:1,469 Joined:Feb 2011
lmao.gif I'm sorry Taco. We have a word filter in place. chuckle.gif

t-dancing.gifwhip.gif
10-11-2012, 04:06 PM #6
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
(10-11-2012, 04:01 PM)Octo Wrote:  lmao.gif I'm sorry Taco. We have a word filter in place. chuckle.gif

t-dancing.gifwhip.gif


rofl.gif why in the world would you filter G.e.o. into tiny? But whatever floats your boat....t-dancing.gif
10-11-2012, 04:07 PM #7
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,265 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
lmao.gif Sorry man, we have a nutty as squirrel turd spam tard with an obsessive compulsive disorder.
The very definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expect different results. He is the case in point. He's either an angry pissy individual with no life raging_midget.gif
Or working for some alphabet agency. Either way is a total idiot in addition to failure.

wonder.gif
10-11-2012, 09:14 PM #8
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
and

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/10/11/sheen...oversight/



Now what did I say

“The size of the sheen, its persistent point of origin and other factors indicate the most likely source is the bent riser pipe that once connected the rig to the well head, where a mix of oil, drilling mud and seawater were trapped after the top kill operation,”

That riser about 1-mile long and 38-inch OD (typical) can hold a lot of oil

Thank you very much.... coffeetime.gif
10-11-2012, 09:19 PM #9
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011
Pfffffft, they cut that riser off before the top kill, regardless would be full of oil and seawter. The mud would be long gone by that time.... bleh.gif



Geo


chuckle.gif
10-13-2012, 11:28 AM #10
Tacolover II Member
Posts:427 Threads:59 Joined:Feb 2011

"BP and Transocean will use satellite images and remotely operated vehicles to determine the origin of an oil sheen discovered last month and linked this week to the 2010 Gulf oil spill, the Coast Guard said Friday night."

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/10/12/bp-tr...lated-oil/


If BP and the US Coastguard ƒükkêd up that cement job then their Goose is really going to be cooked.

I figured the riser could contain over 60,000 gallons of oil in it...
Perhaps a better qualified Geo Physicist could give a better explanation.

I'm sorry y'all. It's like a sickness. I've already been humiliated enough by having my posts removed for saying geo.....g.e.o.


lol.gif



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com