#Login Register


  • 11 Vote(s) - 3.27 Average
Home 


Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900
12-10-2014, 09:40 PM #16
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,217 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
So damn much is hidden from us. It's a shame sad2.gif
12-10-2014, 09:43 PM #17
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,462 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
I have a strange theory about those blocks used in the pyramids. Ever wonder why the dung beetle was so revered in ancient Egypt?
Ever watch with the how it's able to roll these balls with ease?
Is it possible that the cut blocks were encased in giant mud balls and rolled up ramps? Then sprayed with water, removing the mud and then they were settled in place.
When they were constructed there was plenty of mud as sediment from yearly Nile floods.
Plenty of water under the pyramid.
Just a possibility using Occam's Razor.

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
12-10-2014, 11:08 PM #18
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
spock.gif
12-10-2014, 11:23 PM #19
misterbumps Member
Posts:1,051 Threads:38 Joined:Apr 2012
(12-10-2014, 09:43 PM)JayRodney Wrote:  I have a strange theory about those blocks used in the pyramids. Ever wonder why the dung beetle was so revered in ancient Egypt?
Ever watch with the how it's able to roll these balls with ease?
Is it possible that the cut blocks were encased in giant mud balls and rolled up ramps? Then sprayed with water, removing the mud and then they were settled in place.
When they were constructed there was plenty of mud as sediment from yearly Nile floods.
Plenty of water under the pyramid.
Just a possibility using Occam's Razor.

Very interesting. These ancient old structures continually fascinate me. I wonder what skills and knowledge was lost/taken away?

I can see by your coat my friend you're from the other side. Just one thing I got to know. Who won?
12-11-2014, 12:12 AM #20
Accidental Stoner Member
Posts:8,971 Threads:71 Joined:Feb 2011
yup.gif

The cannabis case is a frighteningly good example
of how easy it is for the elite to rewrite history.

Good reason to keep an open mind about other
stuff, too 13.gif
12-11-2014, 12:17 AM #21
Cynicalabsurdance Member
Posts:8,937 Threads:209 Joined:Feb 2011
here's a question

why are the stones at the top of the Pyramids ,,,,,,,,,,,

Older then the stones at the bottom of the Pyramids ?

MUCH Older .
12-11-2014, 12:20 AM #22
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,462 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
damned.gif I did not know that Rog', and... off the top of my head, I can't fathom why.
Any speculation?

wonder.gif
Anonymous Kritter Show this Post
12-11-2014, 12:31 AM #23
Anonymous Kritter Incognito Anonymous
 
this is the first time I've heard of this.
12-11-2014, 12:36 AM #24
misterbumps Member
Posts:1,051 Threads:38 Joined:Apr 2012
me too. Any links?

I can see by your coat my friend you're from the other side. Just one thing I got to know. Who won?
12-11-2014, 12:47 AM #25
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,217 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
That would be some extreme reverse engineering hmm.gif
12-11-2014, 12:56 AM #26
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,462 Threads:1,441 Joined:Feb 2011
I was just researching that, and stumbled on this:

Quote:Even more anomalous, the dates obtained from mortar used near the top of the Pyramid were a thousand years older than those obtained from mortar nearer the Pyramid base. The researchers, if they were to fully believe these findings, would have to propose that the Pyramid had somehow been built from the top down.
More here - http://www.world-mysteries.com/mpl_2_4.htm

Building from the top down on sand would be too unstable to support it's weight the larger it got.
It would have shifted in height if a small amount of the sand settled differently from the rest.
Anyone who's done any construction and has worked with compacting sand can tell you how difficult, if not impossible that would be.
Unless, they had some other method of stabilization that... for the life of me, I can't fathom.

wonder.gif
12-11-2014, 01:02 AM #27
misterbumps Member
Posts:1,051 Threads:38 Joined:Apr 2012
I know it's a dodgy source but it was the best I could find during a quick search before bedtime.

wooden frames and giant sand dunes

I can see by your coat my friend you're from the other side. Just one thing I got to know. Who won?
12-11-2014, 01:04 AM #28
misterbumps Member
Posts:1,051 Threads:38 Joined:Apr 2012
I guess it still does not explain why something would be built from the top down when the reverse is easier.

I can see by your coat my friend you're from the other side. Just one thing I got to know. Who won?
12-11-2014, 01:04 AM #29
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:43,217 Threads:1,478 Joined:Feb 2011
The only theory I have is that at the beginning the top stone was put to float mid-air. As the years passed, people started fearing it would fall down so they added some stones to support the first one. The knowledge was forgotten and the fear grew and more stones was added until it reached the ground.

13.gif
12-11-2014, 01:07 AM #30
misterbumps Member
Posts:1,051 Threads:38 Joined:Apr 2012
Top-down and bottom-up are both strategies of information processing and knowledge ordering, used in a variety of fields including software, humanistic and scientific theories (see systemics), and management and organization. In practice, they can be seen as a style of thinking and teaching.

A top-down approach (also known as stepwise design and in some cases used as a synonym of decomposition) is essentially the breaking down of a system to gain insight into its compositional sub-systems. In a top-down approach an overview of the system is formulated, specifying but not detailing any first-level subsystems. Each subsystem is then refined in yet greater detail, sometimes in many additional subsystem levels, until the entire specification is reduced to base elements. A top-down model is often specified with the assistance of "black boxes", these make it easier to manipulate. However, black boxes may fail to elucidate elementary mechanisms or be detailed enough to realistically validate the model. Top down approach starts with the big picture. It breaks down from there into smaller segments.[1]

A bottom-up approach is the piecing together of systems to give rise to more complex systems, thus making the original systems sub-systems of the emergent system. Bottom-up processing is a type of information processing based on incoming data from the environment to form a perception. From a Cognitive Psychology perspective, information enters the eyes in one direction (sensory input, or the "bottom"), and is then turned into an image by the brain that can be interpreted and recognized as a perception (output that is "built up" from processing to final cognition). In a bottom-up approach the individual base elements of the system are first specified in great detail. These elements are then linked together to form larger subsystems, which then in turn are linked, sometimes in many levels, until a complete top-level system is formed. This strategy often resembles a "seed" model, whereby the beginnings are small but eventually grow in complexity and completeness. However, "organic strategies" may result in a tangle of elements and subsystems, developed in isolation and subject to local optimization as opposed to meeting a global purpose.

You got to love wikipedia!

I can see by your coat my friend you're from the other side. Just one thing I got to know. Who won?



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com