#Login Register


  • 11 Vote(s) - 3.18 Average
Home 


Snowflake Fires a Gun! PTSD Ensues! LMAO!
06-21-2016, 05:39 PM #1
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,350 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
Certainly, the ban all assault weapons agenda is a pretty predictable outcome to the Orlando tragedy.

As we all know, guns are responsible for deaths in the same way shovels are responsible for digging ditches.

A snowflake reporter by the name of Gersh Kuntzman (you can't make this up) wanted to see what the AR-15 was all about, so he drove to a Philadelphia to in his own words "better understand the firepower of military-style weapons and, hopefully, explain their appeal to gun lovers."
It ended with predictable results.

"The recoil bruised my shoulder, which can happen if you don’t know what you’re doing. The brass shell casings disoriented me as they flew past my face. The smell of sulfur and destruction made me sick. The explosions — loud like a bomb — gave me a temporary form of PTSD. For at least an hour after firing the gun just a few times, I was anxious and irritable."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fi...-1.2673201

15.gif

İmage

İmage

wonder.gif
06-21-2016, 05:41 PM #2
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,813 Threads:1,472 Joined:Feb 2011
I bet it was the smell of destruction more than anything

yup.gif
06-21-2016, 06:04 PM #3
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
Never been a kuntzman myself.

blink.gif
06-21-2016, 06:10 PM #4
JayRodney ⓐⓛⓘⓔⓝ
Posts:31,350 Threads:1,438 Joined:Feb 2011
İmage
The AR-15 is big, black and scary.
I think that may have had something to do with it.

wonder.gif
06-21-2016, 06:13 PM #5
Octo Mother Superior
Posts:42,813 Threads:1,472 Joined:Feb 2011
Oh he does look like a kuntzman!

blonde.gif
06-21-2016, 06:38 PM #6
White Ribbon call me
Posts:9,779 Threads:371 Joined:Apr 2013
(06-21-2016, 06:13 PM)Octo Wrote:  Oh he does look like a kuntzman!

blonde.gif

orgazmo3.gif Thank god..
06-21-2016, 07:20 PM #7
Coolchick Member
Posts:5,205 Threads:118 Joined:Mar 2013
'As we all know, guns are responsible for deaths in the same way shovels are responsible for digging ditches.'

lol..ffs.

Just Plain Nuts.
06-21-2016, 07:37 PM #8
US nli Incognito Anonymous
 
I am on the fence with this one. If the crazies and extreme crazies were not able to buy assault-type weapons, then of course that would not stop them from using non-automatic type weapons. It is just that less people would be killed as the authorities seem to take forever to show up and/or stop the shootings.
06-21-2016, 07:38 PM #9
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,733 Threads:641 Joined:Feb 2011
ğck him. If an AR-15 bruised his shoulder he is completely worthless and should just throw himself off a tall building.



An honest convert and three poor souls hiding in their dogmatic, crybully denial.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
06-21-2016, 07:51 PM #10
Coolchick Member
Posts:5,205 Threads:118 Joined:Mar 2013
(06-21-2016, 07:37 PM)US nli Wrote:  I am on the fence with this one. If the crazies and extreme crazies were not able to buy assault-type weapons, then of course that would not stop them from using non-automatic type weapons. It is just that less people would be killed as the authorities seem to take forever to show up and/or stop the shootings.

all the guns of every kind and size and shape should be thrown in a huge melting pot
to be melted down and made into something useful.

if that was done then NO ONE would have one..
then we would see the truth from ppl who love them 'for defense only' lol right.

no, they would finally have to say 'cause we think they are cool!' which is the truth for most.

Just Plain Nuts.
06-21-2016, 08:38 PM #11
Kreeper Griobhtha
Posts:10,733 Threads:641 Joined:Feb 2011
(06-21-2016, 07:51 PM)Coolchick Wrote:  
(06-21-2016, 07:37 PM)US nli Wrote:  I am on the fence with this one. If the crazies and extreme crazies were not able to buy assault-type weapons, then of course that would not stop them from using non-automatic type weapons. It is just that less people would be killed as the authorities seem to take forever to show up and/or stop the shootings.

all the guns of every kind and size and shape should be thrown in a huge melting pot
to be melted down and made into something useful.

if that was done then NO ONE would have one..
then we would see the truth from ppl who love them 'for defense only' lol right.

no, they would finally have to say 'cause we think they are cool!' which is the truth for most.

What would that solve? Absolutely nothing. People were murdering each other eons before guns were invented. People are the problem, not guns. If all guns were collected and melted down we would just go back to older ways of killing each other. It's just another one of those situations where we are looking for a scapegoat instead of trying to fix the actual problem.

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to poor
06-21-2016, 08:43 PM #12
Coolchick Member
Posts:5,205 Threads:118 Joined:Mar 2013
well it would get rid of the mass shootings that ppl can now just walk in and do, for one thing. how is that a bad thing?

if there were no gun laws, ppl would not just suddenly 'behave'. no way. ppl would be using guns for immediate solutions to road rage and jealousy and everything else.

lol if ppl could, they would be blowing away anyone who pissed them off!

and sure ppl have always been killing each other but a gun is an immediate threat as opposed to say a spear or something.. you dont have to engage anyone up close or anything with a gun.

Just Plain Nuts.
Dr. Evil Show this Post
06-21-2016, 08:50 PM #13
Dr. Evil Incognito Anonymous
 
► An amendment by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., would allow the attorney general to deny a gun sale to anyone if she has a "reasonable belief" — a lesser standard than "probable cause" — that the buyer was likely to engage in terrorism. The proposal is popularly known as the "no-fly, no-buy" amendment, but wouldn't just apply to people on the "no fly" terrorist watch list.

► An Republican alternative by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, which would require that law enforcement be alerted when anyone on the terror watch list attempts to buy a weapon from a licensed dealer. If the buyer has been investigated for terrorism within the past five years, the attorney general could block a sale for up to three days while a court reviews the sale.

► An amendment by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, would make it more difficult to add mentally ill people to the background check database, giving people suspected of serious mental illness a process to challenge that determination.

► An amendment by Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., that would close the "gun show loophole" by requiring every gun purchaser to undergo a background check, and to expand the background check database.

The GUN LEGISLATION BILLS are NOT Passing because they are far to general.
They cover in vague references general subjects that are easily open to interpretation and mistranslation!

The Gun Legislation bills do not DIRECTLY ADDRESS and Target single legal issues with gun sales! They are hog pog legal constructions left open to misuse!

ITS almost as if they were intentionally written to NOT PASS EVER!
Dr. Evil Show this Post
06-21-2016, 08:52 PM #14
Dr. Evil Incognito Anonymous
 
Yes I actually went to the senates website looked up the proposed bills and read each on of them! And my conclusion is that they are not properly written and will never pass in any country on the grounds of vague representation.
06-21-2016, 09:03 PM #15
Coolchick Member
Posts:5,205 Threads:118 Joined:Mar 2013
anyway.

it doesnt seem to matter one way or the other what is written or how it is written.

ppl who really want to get a gun, will.
simple as that.

lol.

Just Plain Nuts.



Home 




 



DISCLAIMER / Terms of Service (TOS):
Kritterbox.com - Socialize anonymously, commentary, discussion, oddities, technology, music and more!  This website is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. kritterbox.com shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
This website exists solely for the purposes of exchange of information, communication and general entertainment. Opinions from posters are in no way endorsed by kritterbox.com. All posts on this website are the opinion of the authors and are not to be taken as statements of fact on behalf of kritterbox.com. This site may contain coarse language or other material that kritterbox.com is in no way responsible for. Material deemed to be offensive or pornographic at the discretion of kritterbox.com shall be removed. kritterbox.com reserves the right to modify, or remove posts and user accounts on this website at our discretion. kritterbox.com disclaims all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of any material on this website. Fictitious posts and any similarity to any person living or dead is coincidental.
All users shall limit the insertion of any and all copyrighted material to portions of the article that are relevant to the point being made, with no more than 50%, and preferably less of the original source material. A link shall be visible in text format, embedded directly to the original source material without exception.
No third party links, i.e. blogs or forums will be accepted under any circumstances, and will be edited by staff in order to reflect the original source of copyrighted material, or be removed at the sole discretion of kritterbox.com.
Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science, and technology. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for educational and/or research purposes.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at any time at our discretion.
Copyright © 2011 - 2017 kritterbox.com